Cover not available

Article published In: Constructions in Applied Linguistics
Edited by Susan Hunston and Florent Perek
[International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3] 2019
► pp. 291–323

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Construction Grammar and the corpus-based analysis of discourses

The case of the WAY IN WHICH construction

 | University of Birmingham
Published online: 27 August 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.00014.gro
Abstract
Construction grammar (CxG) initially arose as a usage-based alternative to nativist theoretical accounts of language, and remains to this day strongly associated with cognitive linguistic theory and research. In this paper, however, I argue that CxG can be seen as offering an equally viable general framework for socially-oriented linguists whose work focuses on the corpus-based analysis of discourses (CBADs). The paper begins with brief reviews of CxG and CBADs as distinctive research traditions, before going on to identify synergies (both potential and actual) between them. I then offer a more detailed case study example, focusing on a usage-based analysis of a newly identified construction, the WAY IN WHICH construction, as it occurs in corpora representing six different academic discourses. The paper concludes by rebutting some anticipated objections to the approach advocated here, and by proposing a new conceptual model for constructionist approaches to CBADs.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Construction Grammar
  • 3.The corpus-based analysis of discourses
  • 4.Previous applications of CxG to CBADs
  • 5.Case study: Epistemological variation and the WAY IN WHICH construction
    • 5.1A closer look at the WAY IN WHICH construction
    • 5.2Data and methods
    • 5.3Quantitative analysis
    • 5.4Qualitative analysis
  • 6.Remaining issues and objections
    • 6.1Terminological issues
    • 6.2Objections to CxG’s ‘cognitive commitment’
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (102)
References
Aijmer, K. (2015). General extenders in learner language. In N. Groom, M. Charles & S. John (Eds.), Corpora, Grammar and Discourse: In Honour of Susan Hunston (pp. 211–234). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Pragmatic markers as constructions. The case of anyway . In G. Kaltenböck, E. Keizer & A. Lohmann (Eds.), Outside the Clause: Form and Function of Extra-clausal Constituents (pp. 29–58). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Corpus pragmatics: From form to function. In A. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in Pragmatics (pp. 555–586). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anthony, L. (2018). AntConc (Version 3.5.0 for Mac OSX). [Computer software]. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed July 2019).
Antonopoulou, E., & Nikiforidou, K. (2011). Construction grammar and conventional discourse: A construction-based approach to discoursal incongruity. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (10), 2594–2609. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, P. (2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, P., & McEnery, T. (Eds.) (2015). Corpora and Discourse Studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergs, A., & Diewald, G. (Eds.) (2009). Contexts and Constructions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T. A. (2007). Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at … : Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks.’ Applied Linguistics, 25 (3), 371–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biglan, A. (1973a). The characteristics of subject matter in different scientific areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57 (3), 195–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1973b). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57 (3), 204–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, H. C. (2013). Cognitive Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffman & G. Trousdale (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 233–252). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boas, H. C., & Sag, I. (Eds.) (2012). Sign-based Construction Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brookes, G., & Harvey, K. (2016). Examining the discourse of mental illness in a corpus of online advice-seeking messages. In L. Pickering, E. Friginal, & S. Staples (Eds.) Talking at Work: Corpus-based Explorations of Workplace Discourse (pp. 209–234). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cappelle, B. (2006). Particle placement and the case for ‘allostructions’. Constructions. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed April 2019).
Charles, M. (2006). Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 25 (3), 310–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23 (4), 397–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowie, A. P. (1998). Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durrant, P. (2017). Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university students’ writing: Mapping the territories. Applied Linguistics, 38 (2), 165–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 63–103). Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2016). Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (2013). Berkeley Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 111–132). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., & Kay, P. (1995). Construction Grammar. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language, 64 (3), 501–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, K. (2015). Conversation, construction grammar, and cognition. Language and Cognition, 7 (4), 563–588. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1970). The Order of Things. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fried, M., & Östman, J.-O. (2005). Construction Grammar and spoken language: The case of pragmatic particles. Journal of Pragmatics, 37 (11), 1752–1778. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gabrielatos, C., & Baker, P. (2008). Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK Press 1996–2005. Journal of English Linguistics, 36 (1), 5–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. (2014). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method (4th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, G. (2015). The use of phrasal verbs by French-speaking EFL learners. A constructional and collostructional corpus-based approach. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11 (1), 51–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gledhill, C. (2000). Collocations in Science Writing. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). The ‘lexicogrammar’ approach to analysing phraseology and collocation in ESP texts. Anglais de Spécialité, 59 1, 5–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S., & Paquot, M. (2008). Disentangling the phraseological web. In S. Granger & F. Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 27–50). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. (2008). Phraseology and linguistic theory: A brief survey. In S. Granger & F. Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (pp. 3–25). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspectives on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9 (1), 97–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groom, N., & Grieve, J. (2019). The evolution of a legal genre: Rhetorical moves in British patent specifications, 1711 to 1860. In T. Fanego & P. Rodríguez-Puente (Eds.), Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse (pp. 201–234). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. (2013). Constructional Change in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Three open questions in diachronic construction grammar. In E. Coussé, P. Andersson & J. Olofsson (Eds.), Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar (pp. 21–39). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hiltunen, T. (2010). Grammar and Disciplinary Culture: A Corpus-based Study. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, M., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2008). Lexicography, grammar, and textual position. International Journal of Lexicography, 21 (3), 293–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Examining associations between lexis and textual position in hard news stories, or according to a study by … In N. Groom, M. Charles & S. John (Eds.), Corpora, Grammar and Discourse: In Honour of Susan Hunston (pp. 117–144). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S., Evert, S., Smith, N., Lee, D. Y. W., & Berglund, Y. (2008). Corpus Linguistics with BNCweb: A Practical Guide. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Hoffmann, T., & Bergs, A. (2018). A construction grammar approach to genre. CogniTextes, 18 1. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed April 2019).
Hoffmann, T., & Trousdale, G. (Eds.), (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27 (1), 4–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaworska, S. (2016). Using a corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS) approach to investigate constructions of identities in media reporting surrounding mega sports events: The case of the London Olympics 2012. In I. R. Lamond & L. Platt (Eds.), Critical Event Studies: Approaches to Research (pp. 149–174). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Z. (2017). What are they good for? A constructionist account of counterfactuals in ordinary Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 113 (1), 30–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jing-Schmidt, Z. & X. Peng. (2016). The emergence of disjunction: A history of constructionalization in Chinese. Cognitive Linguistics, 27 (1), 101–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kay, P. (2002). An informal sketch of a formal architecture for construction grammar. Grammars, 5 (1), 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Pragmatic aspects of grammatical constructions. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 675–700). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerz, E., & Wiechmann, D. (2016). Second language construction learning: Investigating domain-specific adaptation in advanced L2 production. Language and Cognition, 8 (4), 533–565. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koester, A. (2012). Corpora and workplace discourse. In K. Hyland, M. H. Chau & M. Handford (Eds.), Corpus Applications in Applied Linguistics: Current Approaches and Future Directions (pp. 47–64). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kopaczyk, J., & Tyrkkö, J. (Eds.) (2018). Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form: A Theory of Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linell, P. (2009). Grammatical constructions in dialogue. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Contexts and Constructions (pp. 97–110). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaelis, L. (2013). Sign-based construction grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 133–152). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaelis, L., & Lambrecht, K. (1996). Toward a construction-based model of language function: The case of nominal extraposition. Language, 72 (2), 215–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morton, T., Walsh, S., & O’Keeffe, A. (2011). Analyzing university spoken interaction: A corpus linguistics/conversation analysis approach. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16 (3), 326–345.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nikiforidou, K., & Fischer, K. (2016). On the interaction of constructions with register and genre. Constructions and Frames, 7 (2), 137–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oakey, D. (2008). The Form and Function of Fixed Collocational Patterns in Research Articles in Different Academic Disciplines (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Fixed collocational patterns in isolexical and isotextual versions of a corpus. In P. Baker (Ed.), Contemporary Corpus Linguistics (pp. 140–58). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Östman, J.-O. (2005). Construction discourse: A prolegomenon. In J.-O. Östman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions (pp. 121–44). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Östman, J.-O., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Dialects, discourse, and Construction Grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 476–490). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patten, A. (2012). The English It-cleft: A Constructional Account and a Diachronic Investigation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Phraseology (n.d). In the Oxford Online Dictionary. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed July 2019).
(2016). Using distributional semantics to study syntactic productivity in diachrony: A case study. Linguistics, 54 (1), 149–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potts, A., Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2015). How can computer-based methods help researchers to investigate news values in large datasets? A corpus linguistic study of the construction of newsworthiness in the reporting on Hurricane Katrina. Discourse & Communication, 9 (2), 149–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Römer, U., O’Donnell, M. B., & Ellis, N. C. (2015). Using COBUILD grammar patterns for a large-scale analysis of verb-argument constructions: Exploring corpus data and speaker knowledge. In N. Groom, M. Charles & S. John (eds.). Corpora, Grammar and Discourse: In Honour of Susan Hunston (pp. 43–71). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rühlemann, C. (2014). Narrative in English Conversation: A Corpus Analysis of Storytelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Corpus Linguistics for Pragmatics: A Guide for Research. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rühlemann, C., & Clancy, B. (2018). Corpus linguistics and pragmatics. In C. Ilie & N. R. Norrick (Eds.), Pragmatics and its Interfaces (pp. 241–266). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. M. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). The search for units of meaning. Textus, 9 (1), 75–106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8 (2), 209–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. (1997). Whorf’s children: Critical comments on critical discourse analysis (CDA). In A. Ryan & A. Wray (Eds.), Evolving Models of Language (pp. 100–116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tadros, A. (1994). Predictive categories in expository text. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in Written Text Analysis (pp. 69–82). London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, C. & Marchi, A. (Eds.) (2018). Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teubert, W. (2005). My version of corpus linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10 (1), 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Meaning, Discourse and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toolan, M. (1997). What is critical discourse analysis and why are people saying such terrible things about it? Language and Literature, 6 (2), 83–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Upton, T. A., & Cohen, M. A. (2009). An approach to corpus-based discourse analysis: The move analysis as example. Discourse Studies, 11 (5), 585–605. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wulff, S., Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. (2007). Brutal Brits and persuasive Americans: Variety-specific meaning construction in the into-causative. In G. Radden, K. Köpcke, T. Berg & P. Siemund (Eds.), Aspects of Meaning Construction (pp. 265–81). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoon, J. & Gries, S. T. (2016). Corpus-based Approaches to Construction Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Hart, Christopher
2024. Multimodal meaning making in news communication about immigration: using the NewsScape corpus to explore co-verbal images in TV news. Frontiers in Communication 9 DOI logo
Hart, Christopher
2025. Using generative AI to investigate the multimodal representation of refugees and migrants. Discourse & Society DOI logo
Peng, Bingzhuan
2024. Subjectivity of Discourse Constructions in News Discourse by Integrating Construction Grammar and Critical Discourse Analysis. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo
Wu, Changlin & Changan Wu
2024. Complexity Analysis of Chinese Text Based on the Construction Grammar Theory and Deep Learning. ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing DOI logo
Janda, Laura A., Masako Fidler, Václav Cvrček & Anna Obukhova
2023. The case for case in Putin’s speeches. Russian Linguistics 47:1 ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
SUNG, MIN-CHANG
2023. Functional idiosyncrasies of suggesting constructions in British English. English Language and Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 321 ff. DOI logo
Hart, Christopher & Javier Marmol Queralto
2021. What can cognitive linguistics tell us about language-image relations? A multidimensional approach to intersemiotic convergence in multimodal texts. Cognitive Linguistics 32:4 ► pp. 529 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue