Cover not available

Article published In: Constructions in Applied Linguistics
Edited by Susan Hunston and Florent Perek
[International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:3] 2019
► pp. 268–290

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

A corpus perspective on the development of verb constructions in second language learners

 | Georgia State University
Published online: 27 August 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.00013.roe
Abstract
This article reports initial findings from a study that uses written data from second language (L2) learners of English at different proficiency levels (CEFR A1 to C1) in a large-scale investigation of verb-argument construction (VAC) emergence. The findings provide insights into first VACs in L2 learner production, changes in the learners’ VAC repertoire from low to high proficiency levels, and changes in learners’ dominant verb-VAC associations from low to high proficiency levels. The article also addresses the question what role formulaic sequences play in the L2 acquisition of VACs. Data analyses indicate that, from lowest to highest proficiency levels, the VAC repertoire of L2 English learners shows an increase in VAC types, growth in VAC productivity and complexity, and a development from predominantly fixed sequences to more flexible and productive ones. The findings help to expand our understanding of the processes that underlie construction acquisition in an L2 context.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and methods
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1First VACs in German L2 learners of English
    • 3.2Changes in German L2 learners’ English VAC repertoire across levels
    • 3.3Changes in verb-VAC associations across levels
    • 3.4The role of formulaic sequences in L2 VAC acquisition
  • 4.Conclusion and outlook
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (58)
References
Alexopoulou, T., Geertzen, J., Korhonen, A., & Meurers, D. (2015). Exploring big educational learner corpora for SLA research: Perspectives on relative clauses. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 1 (1), 96–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allan, L. G. (1980). A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15 (3), 147–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altenberg, B., & Granger, S. (2001). The grammatical and lexical patterning of MAKE in native and non-native student writing. Applied Linguistics, 22 (2), 173–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E. (2015). A constructivist account of child language acquisition. In B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Emergence (pp. 478–510). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anthony, L. (2014a). AntConc (Version 3.4.2) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed July 2019).
(2014b). TagAnt (Version 1.1.0) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed July 2019).
Barlow, M. (2015). Collocate (Version 2.0) [Computer Software]. Houston, TX: Athelstan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Behrens, H. (2009). Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics, 47 (2), 383–411. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, D., & Manning, C. D. (2014). A fast and accurate dependency parser using neural networks. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 740–750). Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed April 2019).
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2008–). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 million words, 1990-present. Available online at [URL] (last accessed April 2019).
de Marneffe, M.-C., & Manning, C. D. (2008). Stanford typed dependencies manual (revised for the Stanford Parser v. 3.5.2 in April 2015). Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed April 2019).
Díez-Bedmar, M. B. (2012). The use of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages to evaluate compositions in the English exam section of the university admissions examination. Revista de Educación, 357 1, 55–79.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eeg-Olofsson, M., & Altenberg, B. (1994). Discontinuous recurrent word combinations in the London-Lund Corpus. In U. Fries, G. Tottie, & P. Schneider (Eds.), Creating and Using English Language Corpora: Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (pp. 63–77). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 (2), 143–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 63–103). Malden, MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Cadierno, T. (2009). Constructing a second language. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7 1 (Special section), 111–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009). Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7 1, 188–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics – Introduction to the special issue. Applied Linguistics, 27 (4), 558–589. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2014). Construction learning as category learning: A cognitive analysis. In T. Herbst, H. J. Schmid & S. Faulhaber (Eds.), Constructions Collocations Patterns (pp. 71–97). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., O’Donnell, M. B., & Römer, U. (2013). Usage-based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition. Language Learning, 63 (Supp. 1), 25–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B. (2016). Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. (2009). Constructing another language: Usage-based linguistics in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30 (3), 335–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). L2 negation constructions at work. Language Learning, 62 (2), 335–372. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W., & Cadierno, T. (2007). Are recurring multi-word expressions really syntactic freezes? Second language acquisition from the perspective of usage-based linguistics. In M. Nenonen & Niemi, S. (Eds.). Collocations and Idioms 1. Papers from the First Nordic Conference on Syntactic Freezes (pp. 86–99). Joensuu: Joensuu University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W., Cadierno, T., & Li, P. (2015). On the development of motion constructions in four learners of L2 English. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based Perspectives on Second Language Learning (pp. 207–232). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (Eds.). (1983). Language Transfer in Language Learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geertzen, J., Alexopoulou, T., & A. Korhonen. (2013). Automatic linguistic annotation of large scale L2 databases: The EF-Cambridge Open Language Database (EFCAMDAT). In Selected Proceedings of the 31st Second Language Research Forum (SLRF) (pp. 240–254). Carnegie Mellon University: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7 1, 219–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Constructions at Work. The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15 (3), 289–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. & Ellis, N. C. (2015). Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics. Language Learning, 65 (S1), 228–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on alternations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9 (1), 97–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A., & P. Buttery. (2010). Criterial features in learner corpora: Theory and illustrations. English Profile Journal, 1 (1), 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. (2011). Conceptual transfer: Crosslinguistic effects in categorization and construal. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14 1(Special Issue), 1–8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Crosslinguistic influence and multilingualism. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed April 2019).
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kumar, U., Kumar, V., & Kapur, J. N. (1986). Normalized measures of entropy. International Journal of General Systems, 12 (1), 55–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kyle, K. (2016). Measuring Syntactic Development in L2 Writing: Fine Grained Indices of Syntactic Complexity and Usage-Based Indices of Syntactic Sophistication (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. (2017). Assessing syntactic sophistication in L2 writing: A usage-based approach. Language Testing, 34 (4), 513–535. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, P., Eskildsen, S. W., & Cadierno, T. (2014). Tracing an L2 learner’s motion constructions over time: A usage-based classroom investigation. The Modern Language Journal, 98 (2), 612–628. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieven, E., Pine, J. M., & Baldwin, G. (1997). Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development. Journal of Child Language, 24 (1), 187–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murakami, A. (2013). L1 Influence and Individual Variation in the L2 Accuracy Development of Grammatical Morphemes: Insights from Learner Corpora (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, N. (2005). Collocations in a Learner Corpus. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ninio, A. (1999). Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language, 26 (3), 619–653. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Language and the Learning Curve: A New Theory of Syntactic Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nisioi, S. (2015). Feature analysis for native language identification. In A. Gelbukh (Ed.), Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2015 (pp. 644–657). Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perfors, A., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Wonnacott, E. (2010). Variability, negative evidence, and the acquisition of verb argument constructions. Journal of Child Language, 37 (3), 607–642. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. (2017). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Römer, U., & Garner, J. R. (forthcoming). The development of verb constructions in spoken learner English: Tracing effects of usage and proficiency. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research.
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8 (2), 209–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1992). First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Constructing a Language. A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tono, Y., & Díez-Bedmar, M. B. (2014). Focus on learner writing at the beginning and intermediate stages: The ICCI corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19 (2), 163–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trousdale, G., & Hoffmann, T. (Eds.). (2013). Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyler, A. E., & Ortega, L. (2018). Usage-inspired L2 instruction: An emergent, researched pedagogy. In Tyler, A. E., L. Ortega, M. Uno & H. I. Park (Eds.), Usage-inspired L2 Instruction: Researched Pedagogy (pp. 3–26). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (28)

Cited by 28 other publications

Casal, J. Elliott, Christopher M. Stewart, Alistair J. Windsor & Andreas Trotzke
2025. “It is important to consult” a linguist: Verb-Argument Constructions in ChatGPT and human experts’ medical and financial advice. PLOS One 20:5 ► pp. e0324611 ff. DOI logo
Guo, Jiaqi Feng & Pascual Pérez-Paredes
2025. The role of statistical learning in the L2 acquisition and use of nonadjacent predicate-argument constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Li, Yuanke & Junlin Wang
2025. EFL Learners’ Development of Multiword Sequences and Constructions in Longitudinal Integrated Narrative Writings and Their Relationships to Essay Scores. International Journal of Applied Linguistics DOI logo
Rubin, Rachel, Bram Bulté, Magali Paquot & Alex Housen
2025. Exploring complexity at the lexis-grammar interface: Diversity and sophistication of verb-argument structures in L2 Dutch writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 67 ► pp. 101183 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Xiaopeng & Xiaofeng Yang
2025. Verbal diversity within constructions as a predictor of L2 writing proficiency. Journal of Second Language Writing 68 ► pp. 101205 ff. DOI logo
Lestari, Febriana
2024. Analysis of verb argument constructions (VACs) in L2 learners across proficiency levels: A corpus-based study in L1 Indonesian. Applied Corpus Linguistics 4:3 ► pp. 100097 ff. DOI logo
Li, Hang & Xin Yu
2024. Verb argument constructions in argumentative essays by college-level Asian learners of English: Exploring the effects of English proficiency, acquisition context, and topic. Journal of Second Language Writing 65 ► pp. 101127 ff. DOI logo
Lim, Joyce Dong Ok, Geraldine Mark, Pascual Pérez-Paredes & Anne O’Keeffe
2024. Exploring part of speech (pos) tag sequences in a large-scale learner corpus of L2 English: a developmental perspective. Corpora 19:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Park, Ji-Hyun & Min-Chang Sung
2024. Expansion of verb-argument construction repertoires in L2 English writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 62:2 ► pp. 903 ff. DOI logo
Römer-Barron, Ute
2024. How do constructions with modal verbs develop in second language learners of English?. Journal of Second Language Studies 7:2 ► pp. 198 ff. DOI logo
Huang, Lingmin & Yuanke Li
2023. Revisiting the relationships of n-gram measures to L2 writing proficiency: Comparisons between genres and connections to vocabulary levels. System 118 ► pp. 103136 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Yingying & Kevin McManus
2023. Investigating the psychological reality of argument structure constructions and N1 of N2 constructions: a comparison between L1 and L2 speakers of English. Cognitive Linguistics 34:3-4 ► pp. 503 ff. DOI logo
Muftah, Muneera
2023. Data-driven learning (DDL) activities: do they truly promote EFL students’ writing skills development?. Education and Information Technologies 28:10 ► pp. 13179 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Xiaofang, Kunxue Xiao, Min Wang & Lifen Yang
2023. A corpus-driven study of lexicalization models of English intransitive verbs. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Casal, J. Elliott, Yasuhiro Shirai & Xiaofei Lu
2022. English verb-argument construction profiles in a specialized academic corpus: Variation by genre and discipline. English for Specific Purposes 66 ► pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Li, Yuan Ke & An Bang Fang
2022. Synergistic effects of multiword sequences structure, function, frequency and association on raters’ evaluations of essay quality. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
O'Keeffe, Anne & Geraldine Mark
2022. Principled pattern curation to guide data-driven learning design. Applied Corpus Linguistics 2:3 ► pp. 100028 ff. DOI logo
Römer, Ute
2022. Applied corpus linguistics for language acquisition, pedagogy, and beyond. Language Teaching 55:2 ► pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
Römer, Ute
2024. Usage‐Based Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Vis‐à‐Vis Data‐Driven Learning. TESOL Quarterly 58:3 ► pp. 1235 ff. DOI logo
Tan, Yi & Ute Römer
2022. Using phrase-frames to trace the language development of L1 Chinese learners of English. System 108 ► pp. 102844 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Tianqi & Min Wang
2022. Development of the progressive construction in Chinese EFL learners’ written production: From prototypes to marginal members. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 18:2 ► pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
O'Keeffe, Anne
2021. Data-driven learning – a call for a broader research gaze. Language Teaching 54:2 ► pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
O’Keeffe, Anne
2021. Data-driven learning, theories of learning and second language acquisition. In Beyond Concordance Lines [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 102], ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Kun & Xiaofei Lu
2021. Assessing Lexical Psychological Properties in Second Language Production: A Dynamic Semantic Similarity Approach. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Sun, Kun & Rong Wang
2021. Using the Relative Entropy of Linguistic Complexity to Assess L2 Language Proficiency Development. Entropy 23:8 ► pp. 1080 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Yingying & Xiaofei Lu
2020. N1 of N2 constructions in academic written discourse: A pattern grammar analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 47 ► pp. 100893 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Yingying & Xiaofei Lu
2024. Development of verb argument constructions in L2 English learners: A close replication of research question 3 in Römer and Berger (2019). Studies in Second Language Acquisition 46:5 ► pp. 1373 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2025. Corpus Linguistics for Language Learning Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 12], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue