Article published In: International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
Vol. 9:2 (2022) ► pp.197–231
The quantity adjective duō in Chinese and the event quantity construction
Published online: 6 December 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.21005.liu
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.21005.liu
Abstract
In the duō event quantity construction, duō ‘much’ is a quantity adjective. What
duō ‘much’ modifies is the root of the verb and the root has to move to the light verb position to be
categorically defined. The quantity adjective duō ‘much’ functions to introduce a measure function which measures
the event denoted by the verb along the dimension valued by the assignment function A, and the domain to which
the measure function applies must be monotonic. So, the ‘modification’ relation between the quantity adjective
duō ‘much’ and its modifyee essentially differs from that between a typical gradable adjective like
tián ‘sweat’ and its modifyee. This explains how the quantity adjective duō ‘much’ differs
from the typical adjective in syntax and semantics.
Keywords: event, measure function, monotonicity, quantity adjective, root
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The properties of the duō event quantity construction
- 2.1The syntactic properties
- 2.2The semantic properties
- 3.Preliminaries
- 3.1Huang et al. (2009): The argument structure of Chinese lexical verbs
- 3.2Harley (2009)
- 3.3Wellwood (2015)
- 4.Proposal: A root-based analysis
- 5.Implications
- 5.1The modifyee of ‘Deg duō’
- 5.2The marker de
- 5.3The types of aktionsarten
- 6.Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (53)
Bošković, Ž. (2005). On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica, 59 (1), 1–45.
Chen, M.-M. (2013). The V-duō construction in Mandarin Chinese. Master Thesis, National Chiao Tung University.
Cheng, L. L.-S. (2007). Verb copying in Mandarin Chinese. In N. Corver & J. Nunes (Eds.), The copy theory of movement on the PF side (pp. 151–174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chierchia, G. (1998). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6(4), 339–405.
Cresswell, M. J. (1977). The semantics of degree. In B. Partee (Ed.), Montague grammar (pp. 261–292). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Erlewine, M. Y. (2020). Anti-locality and subject extraction. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 5(1), 1–38.
Ernst, T. (1996). Chinese evidence for semi-arguments. In C.-C. Cheng, J. L. Packard & J. H. S. Yoon (Eds.), Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 26(1/2), 117–132. Urbana, IL: Department of Linguistics, University of Illinois Urbana.
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 201 (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harley, H. (2009). Compounding in distributed morphology. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 129–144). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hsieh, I.-T. (2019). Q-adjectives in Mandarin and the interpretation of nominal phrases. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 6(1), 46–75.
Huang, C.-T. J. (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Huang, C.-T. J., Li, Y.-H. A., & Li, Y.-F. (2009). The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Huang, S.-Z. (2006). Property theory, adjectives, and modification in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 15(4), 343–369.
Kratzer, A. (1996). Severing the external argument from its verb. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (Eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp.109–137). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Krifka, M. (1992). Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In I. A. Sag & A. Szabolcsi (Eds.), Lexical matters (pp. 29–53). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (2005). Argument realization. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, L. (2010). Arguments for pseudo-resultative predicates. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 28(1), 135–182.
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Liao, W.-W. (2004). The architecture of aspect and duration. Master Thesis, National Tsing Hua University.
Lin, T.-H. (2001). Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
Lin, J.-W. (2004). Hànyŭ de wángchéng dòngcí: Èrshí nián yĭhòu. (Accomplishment verbs in Mandarin Chinese: 20 years later). Paper presented at the 9th International Symposium on Chinese Language and Linguistics. National Taiwan University, Taiwan.
(2014). The adjective of quantity duō ‘many/much’ and differential comparatives in Mandarin Chinese. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 1(2), 163–191.
Liu, C.-S. L. (2018). A comparative with two standards of comparison. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 5(2), 195–225.
(2020). The adjective dà in Taiwanese Mandarin: Degree, measurement and roots. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 29(2), 119–157.
Lü, S.-X. et al. (1980). Xiàndài hànyŭ bābăi cí (Eight hundred words in modern Chinese). Běijīng: Shāngwù Ynshūguăn.
(1997). No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(2), 201–225.
Merchant, J. (2019). Roots don’t select, categorial heads do: Lexical selection of PPs may vary by category. The Linguistic Review, 36(3), 325–341.
Nakanishi, K. (2004). On comparative quantification in the verbal domain. In R. B. Young (Ed.), Proceedings of SALT XIV1, 179–196. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Paul, W. (2002). Proxy categories in phrase structure theory and the Chinese VP. Cahiers de Linguistique-Asie Orientale, 311, 137–174.
Ramchand, G. (1997). Aspect and predication: The semantics of argument structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rothstein, S. (2004). Structuring events: A study in the semantics of lexical aspect. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Schwarzschild, R. (2002). The grammar of measurement. In B. Jackson (Ed.), Proceedings of SALT XII1, 225–245. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Tai, J. H.-Y. (1984). Verbs and times in Chinese: Vendler’s four categories. In T. David, M. Veena & D. Joseph (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on lexical semantics. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Tenny, C. (1992). The aspectual interface hypothesis. In I. A. Sag & A. Szabolcsi (Eds.), Lexical matters (pp.1–27). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Tsao, F.-F. (1987). On the so-called ‘verb-coyping’ construction in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers’ Association, 21, 13–43.
von Stechow, A. (1984). Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics, 3(1), 1–77.
Wellwood, A. (2015). On the semantics of comparison across categories. Linguistics and Philosophy, 38(1), 67–101.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
