Article published In: International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
Vol. 9:2 (2022) ► pp.232–265
The idiosyncratic preposition zai in Mandarin Chinese and differential argument marking
Published online: 6 December 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.21003.kuo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.21003.kuo
Abstract
In this paper, I focus on the Mandarin spatial preposition zai (‘at’), which can appear in the VP
domain, like other spatial prepositions, but which can also appear in the TP domain, where it’s presence or absence is sensitive
to the animacy and definiteness properties of its object. I argue that zai’s distribution and behavior in the TP
domain is expected if it functions as a differential argument marker triggered by internal topicalization of its object.
Implications of the current analysis for the internal structure of spatial PPs are also considered.
Keywords: preposition, TP domain, VP domain, differential argument marking, localizer
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Spatial PPs in general
- 2.1The distributions
- 2.2More about zai (‘at’)
- 3.Toward a solution
- 3.1A previous proposal
- 3.2Differential argument marking
- 3.3DAM and information structure
- 4.The structure of spatial PPs
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (50)
Abels, K. (2003). Successive
Cyclicity, Anti-Locality, and Adposition Stranding. [Unpublished Doctoral
dissertation]. University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Bossong, G. (1982). Der
präpositionale Akkusativ im Sardischen. In O. Winkelmann & M. Braisch (Eds.), Festschrift
für Johannes Hubschmid zum 65.
Geburtstag (pp. 579–599). Francke.
Dabir-Moghaddam, M. (1992). On
the (in)dependence of syntax and pragmatics: Evidence from the postposition -rā in
Persian. In D. Stein (Ed.), Cooperating
with written texts: The pragmatics and comprehension of written
texts (pp. 549–573). Mouton de Gruyter.
Dalrymple, M. & Nikolaeva, I. (2011). Objects
and information structure. Cambridge University Press.
Djamouri, R., Paul, W., & Whitman, J. (2013). Postpositions
vs. prepositions in Mandarin Chinese: The articulation of
disharmony. In T. Biberauer & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Theoretical
approaches to disharmony word
order (pp. 74–105). Oxford University Press.
Escandell-Vidal, M. V. (2009). Differential
object marking and topicality: The case of Balearic Catalan. Studies in
Language, 33(4), 832–884.
Gardani, F. (2015). Animacy-controlled
phenomena in Italo-Romance. Talk given in Linguistisches Kolloquium,
Institut für Romanistik, Universität Wien.
Hsu, Y.-Y. (2005). The
Syntactic Structure and Pedagogical Grammar of Modals in Mandarin Chinese [Unpublished
master’s thesis]. National Taiwan Normal University.
Huang, C.-T. J. (2010). Lexical
decomposition, silent categories, and the localizer phrase. Yuyanxue
Luncong, 391, 86–122.
Iemmolo, G. (2010). Topicality and differential object marking. Evidence from Romance and beyond. Studies in Language, 34(2). 239–272.
(2020). Topicality
and differential object marking in Mandarin Chinese: Identity and Variety in an array of
structures. In A. Bárány & L. Kalin (Eds.), Case,
agreement, and their interactions: New Perspectives on differential argument
marking, (pp. 269–300). De Gruyter.
Laca, B. (1987). Sobre
el uso del acusativo preposicional en español. In C. Pensado (Ed.), El
complemento directo
preposicional (pp. 61–91). Visor.
Li, C. N. & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin
Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. University of California Press.
(2006). Chinese
Ba. In M. Everaert, & H. van Riemsdik (Eds.), The
Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol.
1 (pp. 374–468). Blackwell.
(2017). Review
article of Waltraud Paul’s New Perspectives on Chinese Syntax (2015). Glossa: a journal of
general
linguistics, 1(1), 1–17.
Liu, F.-H. (1998). A
clitic analysis of locative particles. Journal of Chinese
Linguistics, 26(1), 48–70.
Liu, Y., Pan, W. & Gu, W. (1996). Modern Chinese Grammar for Teachers of Chinese as a Second Language & Advanced Learners of Modern Chinese. Shita Shu Yuan.
Lobeck, A. (1990). Functional
heads as proper governors. In J. Carter, D. Rose-Marie, B. Philip, & T. Sherer (Eds.), Proceedings
of the North East Linguistic
Society 201 (pp. 348–362). GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
McCawley, J. D. (1992). Justifying
part-of-speech assignments in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese
Linguistics, 20(2), 211–245.
McGregor, W. B. (1998). Optional
ergative marking in Gooniyandi revisited: Implications to the theory of marking. Leuvens
contributions in linguistics and
philology, 87(3–4), 491–571.
(2006). Focal
and optional ergative marking in Warrwa (Kimberley, Western
Australia). Lingua, 116(4), 393–423.
Paris, M.-C. (1979). Some
aspects of the syntax and semantics of the lian…ye/dou construction in
Mandarin. Cahiers de linguistique Asie
orientale, 5(1), 47–70.
Paul, W. (2005). Low IP area and left periphery in Mandarin Chinese. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes, 331, 111–134.
Saito, M., & Murasugi, K. (1990). N’-deletion
in Japanese. In J. Ormazabal & C. Tenny (Eds.), University
of Connecticut Working Papers in
Linguistics 31 (pp. 87–107). Department of Linguistics, University of Connecticut.
Saito, M., Lin, T.-H. J. & Murasugi, K. (2008). N’-ellipsis
and the structure of noun phrases in Chinese and Japanese. Journal of East Asian
Linguistics, 171, 247–271.
Seržant, I. A. (2016). Nominative
case in Baltic in the typological perspective. In A. Holvoet & N. Nau (Eds.), Valency,
argument realization and grammatical relations in
Baltic (pp. 137–198). John Benjamins.
Svenonius, P. (2007). Adpositions,
particles and the arguments they introduce. In E. Reuland, T. Bhattacharya & G. Spathas (Eds.), Argument
Structure (pp. 71–110). John Benjamins.
Takahashi, H. (2020). Cross-Linguistic
Variation in the Layered Structure of PP: Evidence from PP Internal
NP-Ellipsis. In J. Garzonio & S. Rossi (Eds.), Variation
in P: Comparative Approaches to Adpositional
Phrases (pp. 191–217). Oxford University Press.
Tsai, W.-T. D. (2015). On
the Topography of Chinese Modals. In U. Shlonsky (Ed.), Beyond
Functional
Sequence (pp. 275–294). Oxford University Press.
Tsao, F.-F. (1987). A
topic-comment approach to the Ba construction. Journal of Chinese
Linguistics, 15(1), 1–55.
van Bergen, G. (2006). To
ba or not to ba: Differential Object Marking in
Chinese [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Radboud University.
von Heusinger, K. & Kaiser, G. A. (2007). Differential
object marking and the lexical semantics of verbs in
Spanish. In G. A. Kaiser & M. Leonetti (Eds.), Proceedings
of the Workshop “Definiteness, Specificity and Animacy in Ibero-Romance
Languages” (pp. 83–109). Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft.
Witzlack-Makarevich, A. & Seržant, I. A. (2018). Differential
argument marking: Patterns of variation. In I. A. Seržant & A. Witzlack-Makarevich (Eds.), Diachrony
of differential argument
marking (pp. 1–40). Language Science Press.
Wu, H.-H. I. (2015). The
Fine structure of Spatial PPs in Mandarin Chinese. In W.-T. D. Tsai (Ed.), The
Cartography of Chinese Syntax, The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume
11 (pp. 209–234). Oxford University Press.
Yang, N., & van Bergen, G. (2007). Scrambled
objects and case marking in Mandarin
Chinese. Lingua, 117(9), 1617–1653.
Zhang, N. N. (2002). Movement
within a spatial phrase. In H. Cuyckens & G. Radden (Eds.), Perspectives
on Prepositions, Linguisticsche Arbeiten,
Band 4541 (pp. 47–63). Niemeyer.
(2017). Adpositions. In R. Sybesma, W. Behr, Y. Gu, Z. Handel, C.-T. J. Huang, & J. Myers (Eds.), Encyclopedia
of Chinese Language and Linguistics, Vol.
1 (pp. 116–122). Brill.
Zou, K. (1995). The
syntax of the Chinese ba-construction and verb compounds: a morpho-syntactic
analysis [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of South California.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
