Cover not available

Article published In: International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
Vol. 9:2 (2022) ► pp.155–174

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Interpreting the eventive copula 做 tso3 in Taiwanese Southern Min

 | National Tsing Hua University
Published online: 6 December 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.16017.lie
Abstract
This paper proposes an eventive copula 做 tso3 in contrast with the stative copula 是 si7 in Taiwanese Southern Min. The eventive copula 做 tso3 can be established on syntactic grounds. It can occur in copular small clauses on purposive phrases c-selected by distinct types of matrix verbs. The eventive copula 做 tso3 and the stative copula 是 si7 are in complementary distribution. Furthermore, due to its eventive nature the copula 做 tso3 is compatible with experiential and progressive aspect markers and durative time adverbs. Nevertheless, unlike the stative copular 是 si7, the eventive 做 tso3 cannot function as a focus marker. In addition, the eventive copula 做 tso3 rather than its stative counterpart 是 si7 is limited to predicational clauses only.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The functional projection of the copula and types of the post-copular NP
  • 3.Syntactic structures of the eventive copula 做 tso3
    • 3.1Matrix causative verbs
    • 3.2Purposive phrases headed by 來 lai5 or 去 khi3
    • 3.3The boulomaic, deontic, and dynamic modals
    • 3.4Aspect markers
      • 3.4.1Experiential markers
      • 3.4.2Progressive aspect markers
    • 3.5Temporal and spatial adverbs
  • 4.Eventive copula 做 tso3 as distinct from stative copula 是 si7
  • 5.做 tso3 and types of copular clauses
  • 6.做 tso3 as a complementizer
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (22)
References
Adger, D. & Ramchand, G. (2003). Predication and equation. Linguistic Inquiry, 341, 325–360. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Becker, M. (2004). Is isn’t be. Lingua 1141, 399–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowers, J. (2002). Transitivity. Linguistic Inquiry 331, 183–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Arguments as relations. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Deriving syntactic relations. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, G. (1977). References to kinds in English [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Massachusetts at Amherst
den Dikken, M. (2006). Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion and copulas. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doron, E. (1988). The semantics of predicate nominals. Linguistics 261, 281–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Douglas, R. C. (1873). Chinese-English dictionary of the vernacular or spoken language of Amoy with the principal variations of the Chang-chew and Chin-chew dialects. Trübner and Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Higginbotham, J. (1983). The logic of perceptual reports: An extensional alternative to situation semantics. Journal of Philosophy 801, 100–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1985). On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 161, 547–594.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kratzer, A. (1995). Individual-level and stage-level predicates. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 125–175). Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norman, J. & Mei, T. (1976). The Austroasiatics in ancient south China: Some lexical evidence. Monumenta Serica 321, 274–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the semantics of English: A study in subatomic semantics. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar: A handbook of generative syntax (pp. 281–337). Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roy, I. (2013). Nonverbal predication. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schütze, C. T. (2003). When is a verb not a verb? Nordlyd 31(2), 400–415.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zamparelli, R. (2000). Layers in the Determiner phrase. Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zürcher, E. (1977). Late Han vernacular elements in the earliest Buddhist translations. Journal of the Chinese Teacher Association 121, 177–203.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue