Article published In: International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
Vol. 11:2 (2024) ► pp.247–279
On the finiteness of complement clauses in Chinese
Published online: 5 December 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.00030.hu
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.00030.hu
Abstract
This paper investigates the finiteness of complement clauses in
Chinese within the theoretical framework of the Minimalist Program, with a
specific focus on the independency and opacity features. Following He, Y. (2020). Time
in Mandarin: The fingerprints of tense and
finiteness. Ph.D.
Dissertation, Harvard University. and (2022). Finiteness,
opacity, and Chinese clausal
architecture. In Simpson, A. (Ed.), New
explorations in Chinese theoretical syntax: Studies in honor of Yen-Hui
Audrey
Li, (pp. 17–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. , this study proposes that the feature
[IND] represents the independent reference time of the complement clause, and
the feature [OPA] indicates the degree of opacity for syntactic operations. By
integrating these two features, the paper establishes a robust differentiation
between finiteness and nonfiniteness within Chinese complement clauses. Under
the assumption that all complement clauses in Chinese are CP, a propositional CP
is classified as finite when its Co head is positively specified for
both features [+IND, +OPA]. Conversely, an event/action CP is considered
nonfinite when the Co head carries a negative specification: [+ IND, −OPA] or
[−IND, −OPA]. It is worth noting that if the reference time of a complement
clause depends on the matrix clause, it cannot be opaque, and therefore exhibits
transparency. This research sheds light on the intricate relationship between
the independency and opacity features, providing valuable insights into the
syntactic mechanisms underlying complement clauses in Chinese.
Keywords: finiteness, complement clause, independency, opacity
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Syntactic features of chinese subordinate clauses in previous literature
- 2.1Aspect markers
- 2.2Modal auxiliary
- 2.3Null subject PRO
- 2.4Time adverbs
- 3.He (2020) and Huang (2021)’s Assumption
- 4.Finiteness and nonfiniteness in Chinese within the minimalist program
framework
- 4.1Independency
- 4.2Opacity feature
- 4.3The integration of independency feature and opacity feature
- 5.The finiteness distinction among three types of verbs in Chinese
- 6.Other syntactic features related to the finiteness distinction
- 6.1Subjunctive evaluative words
- 6.2Long passivation
- 6.3Complement-adjunct asymmetry
- 7.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (28)
Cao, D. (2018). Revisiting
the finite vs. nonfinite distinction in Mandarin
Chinese. Contemporary
Linguistics, (1):19–39.
Grano, T. (2017). Finiteness
contrasts without Tense? A view from Mandarin
Chinese. Journal of East Asian
Linguistics, (26): 259–299.
He, Y. (2020). Time
in Mandarin: The fingerprints of tense and
finiteness. Ph.D.
Dissertation, Harvard University.
Hu, B. & Chen, H. (2022). Subject
raising in Chinese modal auxiliary verb constructions: A-movement or
A’-movement? Studies in Chinese
Linguistics, 43(1): 39–71.
Hu, J. & Pan, H. & Xu, L. (2001). Is
there a finite vs. nonfinite distinction in
Chinese? Linguistics, 39(6): 1118–1147.
Huang, C.-T. J. (1984). On
the distribution and reference of Empty
Pronouns. Linguistic
Inquiry, 15(4):530–574.
(1989). Pro-Drop
in Chinese: A generalized control
theory. In Jaeggli, O. A. & Safir, K. J. (Eds.), The
null subject parameter, studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory,
Vol15, (pp. 185–214). Dordrecht: Springer.
(2022). Finiteness,
opacity, and Chinese clausal
architecture. In Simpson, A. (Ed.), New
explorations in Chinese theoretical syntax: Studies in honor of Yen-Hui
Audrey
Li, (pp. 17–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Huang, Y. (1994). The
syntax and pragmatics of anaphora: a study with special reference to
Chinese. Cambridge: CUP.
Landau, I. (2004). The
scale of finiteness and the calculus of
control. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory, 22(4): 811–877.
Li, J. & Liu, J. (2005). Study
on the finite and nonfinite of
Chinese. Chinese Language
Learning, (1): 19–24.
Li, Y.-H. A. (1985). Abstract
Case in Chinese. Ph.D.
Dissertation, USC.
Lin, T.-H. J. (2011). Finiteness
of clauses and raising of arguments in Mandarin
Chinese. Syntax, 14(1): 48–73.
(2012). Multiple-modal
constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness
properties. Journal of
Linguistics, 48(1): 151–186.
Pesetsky, D. (2021). Exfoliation:
towards a derivational theory of clause size. [URL]
Shi, D. (2021). Syntactic
status of subjective evaluative
words. Foreign Language Teaching and
Research, 53(6), 803–815.
Shi, Y. (2001). Distinctions
of Chinese finite and infinite verb. Chinese
Teaching in the
world, (2): 23–27.
Sybesma, R. (2019). Finiteness
and Chinese main clauses. International
Journal of Chinese
Linguistics, 6(2): 325–344.
Wurmbrand, S. and Lohninger, M. (2020). An
implicational universal in complementation — theoretical insights and
empirical
progress. In Hartmann, J. M. and Wöllstein, A. (Eds.), Propositional
arguments in cross-linguistic research: theoretical and empirical
issues. (pp. 183–229). Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
