In:New Perspectives on the Study of Ser and Estar
Edited by Isabel Pérez-Jiménez, Manuel Leonetti and Silvia Gumiel-Molina
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 5] 2015
► pp. 147–172
Location and the estar/ser alternation
Published online: 28 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.5.06zag
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.5.06zag
This article is concerned with the syntactic factors that underlie the Spanish ser
‘BESER’/estar ‘BEESTAR’ alternation. In line with recent studies which have argued
that a prepositional feature is crucial to the alternation, it is argued here following
Zagona (2012) that a syntactic process of Locative agreement is crucial to
the alternation: a light verb BE that agrees with either a spatial or a temporal
locative constituent is spelled out as estar ‘BEESTAR’. This approach permits a
unified account of copular and auxiliary estar ‘BEESTAR’. In addition, it accounts
for the fact that the stage-level effect that is often attributed to estar is not found
in contexts where the copula agrees with a predicate of spatial location.
References (31)
Bello, A. (1908). Gramática de la lengua castellana: destinada al uso de los americanos. Paris, France: R. Roger & F. Chernoviz.
Bosque, I. (1999). El sintagma adjetival. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Dir.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 217–310). Madrid, Spain: RAE/Espasa.
Brucart, J.M. (2012). Copular alternation in Spanish and Catalan attributive sentences, Linguística
. Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto, vol. 7 (pp. 9–43).
Camacho, J. (2012).
Ser and estar: Individual/stage level predicates or aspect? In J.I. Hualde, A. Olarrea & E. O’Rourke (Eds.), The handbook of hispanic linguistics (Blackwell handbooks in linguistics) (pp. 453–476). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
. (1994). Aspectual licensing of predicates in Spanish. In V. Samiian (Ed.), Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL), 23 (pp. 26–38). Fresno, CA: Department of Linguistics, CalState University.
Carrasco Gutiérrez, A., Camus Bergareche, B., Martínez-Atienza, M., & García García-Gutiérrez, M. (2006). Diccionario de perífrasis verbales. Madrid, Spain: Gredos.
Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. In R. Freiden, C. Otero & M.L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory (pp. 133–166). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Contreras, H., & Zagona, K. (2014). A note on participial adjectives. Paper presented at the Coloquium on Generative Grammar Workshop in Honor of Violeta Demonte. Centro de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, Madrid, Spain: May 30, 2014.
Demirdache, H., & Uribe-Etxebarria, M. (2000). The primitives of temporal relations. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 157–186). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Demonte, V. (1999). El adjetivo. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Dir.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 129–217). Madrid, Spain: RAE/Espasa.
Gallego, Á., & Uriagereka, J. (2011). The lexical syntax of ser and estar
(Unpublished manuscript). Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
Gehrke, B. (2008). Ps in motion: On the semantics and syntax of P elements and motion events. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Gumiel-Molina, S., Moreno-Quibén, N., & Pérez-Jiménez, I. (2015). Comparison classes and the relative/absolute distinction: A degree-based compositional account of the ser/estar alternation in Spanish. To appear in B. Gehrke & E. Castroviejo (eds.), Degree and manner modification across categories, special volume of Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.
Hale, K. (1986). Notes on world view and semantic categories: Some Warlpiri examples. In P. Muysken & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Features and projections (pp. 233–254). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1998). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S.J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from Building 20 (pp. 53–109). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kayne, R.S. (1993). Towards a modular theory of auxiliary selection. Studia Linguistica, 47(1), 3–31.
Lloyd, P. (1987). From Latin to Spanish. Philadeplphia, PE: Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 173.
de Miguel, E. (1990). El aspecto verbal en una gramática generativa del español (Doctoral Dissertation). Madrid, Spain: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Roby, D.B. (2009). Aspect and the categorization of states: The case of ser and estar in Spanish. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Schmitt, C. (2005). Semi-copulas. In P. Kempchinsky & R. Slabakova (Eds.), Aspectual inquiries (pp. 121–145). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
. (1992).
Ser and estar: A matter of aspect. In
NELS 22 Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society
(pp. 411–425). Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
di Tulio, A. (1997). La estructura del sintagma adjetivo: Adjetivo+DE+X. In O. Kovacci (Ed.), La gramática: desarrollos actuales, Signo y Seña, 7, 189–231.
Vlach, F. (1981). The semantics of the progressive. In P. Tedeschi & A. Zaenen (Eds.), Tense and aspect (Syntax and semantics 14) (pp. 271–292). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Bartens, Angela & Ilpo Kempas
Mangialavori Rasia, M. Eugenia
2018. (And yet) another proposal for ser/estar
. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 13], ► pp. 177 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
