Cover not available

In:New Perspectives on the Study of Ser and Estar
Edited by Isabel Pérez-Jiménez, Manuel Leonetti and Silvia Gumiel-Molina
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 5] 2015
► pp. 85–116

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Sentences as predicates

the Spanish construction ser <muy de + infinitive>

 | Universidad Complutense de Madrid
 | Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Published online: 28 October 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.5.04fer
The construction <muy de + infinitive> is interpreted as a gradable individuallevel predicate (IL-predicate), compatible with the copula ser but not with the copula estar. This supports the idea that the ser and estar distinction is a particular manifestation of Carlson’s (1977) distinction between individuallevel and stage-level predicates (SL-predicates). We propose that the habitual reading of the imperfective aspect of the infinitive in this construction is crucial to interpret the non-finite sentence as a characterizing property. Specifically, we distinguish two cases: animate subjects admit copular predicates containing infinitive sentences with an actualized habitual aspect; inanimate subjects are admitted in constructions with imperfective predicates interpreted as gnomic or deontic habituals. We propose two different syntactic structures for each of these cases and explain the contribution of the preposition de ‘of ’ to the licensing of the non-finite clause as a characterizing predicate.
References (58)
References
Amritavalli, R., & Jayaseelan, K.A. (2003). The genesis of syntactic categories and parametric variation. In H.J. Yoon (Ed.), Generative Grammar in a Broader Perspective: Proceedings of the 4th GLOW in Asia 2003 (pp. 19–41). Seoul, South Korea: Hankook.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertinetto, P.M. (1994). Statives, progressives, habituals. Linguistics, 32, 391–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1997). Il dominio tempo aspettuale. Demarcazioni, intersezioni, contrasti. Turin, Italy: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatt, R. (2000). Covert modality in non-finite context. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, IRCS Technical Reports Series.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boneh, N., & Doron, E. (2008). Habituality and the habitual aspect. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect (pp. 321–347). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, H. (2005). Structuring sense. II The normal course of events. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosque, I., & Gallego, A. (2011). Spanish double passives and related structures. Revista de Estudios Linguisticos da Universidade do Porto, 1(6), 9–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowers, J. (1993). The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 591–656.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brucart, J.M. (2010). La alternancia ser y estar y las construcciones atributivas de localización. In A. Avellana (Ed.), Actas del V Encuentro de Gramática Generativa (pp. 115–152). Neuquén, Argentina: Editorial Universitaria del Comahue.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camacho, J. (2012). Ser and estar: Individual/stage level predicates or aspect? In J.I. Hualde, A. Olarrea & E. O’Rourke (Eds.), The handbook of hispanic linguistics (Blackwell handbooks in linguistics) (pp. 453–476). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camus Bergareche, B. (2004). Perífrasis verbales y expresión del aspecto en español. In L. García Fernández & B. Camus Bergareche (Eds.), El pretérito imperfecto (pp. 511–572). Madrid, Spain: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, G. (1977). Reference to kinds in English (Doctoral Dissertation). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995). Truth conditions on generic sentences: Two constraining views. In G.N. Carlson & F.J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book, (pp. 224–237). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. (1995). Individual level predicates as inherent generics. In G.N. Carlson & F.J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book, (pp. 176–223). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2013). Problems of Projection. Lingua, 130, 33–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). Approaching UG from bellow. In U. Sauerland & H-M. Gärtner (Eds.), Interfaces+recursion=language? (pp. 1–29). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, J. (2004). A multifactorial approach to adverb placement: assumptions, facts, and problems. Lingua, 114, 711–753. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
CREA. Corpus de referencia del español actual. Calls September-October 2012. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Dahl, Ö. (1975). On generics. In E.L. Keenan (Ed.), Formal semantics of natural language (pp. 99–111). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delfitto, D. (2002). Genericity in language: Issues of syntax logical form and interpretation. Alessandria, Italy: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
den Dikken, M. (2006). Relator and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas (Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 47) . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2003). On the syntax of locative and directional adpositional phrases (Unpublished manuscript). New York, NY: CUNY Graduate Center.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ernst, T. (2004). Principles of adverbial distribution in the lower clause. Lingua, 114, 755–777. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fábregas, A. (2012). A guide to IL and SL in Spanish: Properties, problems and proposals. Borealis. An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 1(2), 1–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández Leborans, M.J. (2007). Sobre la oposición Individuo/Estadio en los predicados nominales. In A. Puigvert & I. Delgado (Coord.), Ex admiratione et amicitia. Homenaje a Ramón Santiago (pp. 377–394). Madrid, Spain: Ediciones del Orto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1999). La predicación: las oraciones copulativas. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Dir.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 2357–2460). Madrid, Spain: RAE/Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández Leborans, M.J., & Sánchez López, C. (2011). La interpretación de mucho y cuantificadores afines. In M.V. Escandell-Vidal, M. Leonetti & C. Sánchez López (Eds.), 60 problemas de gramática (pp. 77–82). Madrid, Spain: Akal.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gallego, Á., & Uriagereka, J. (2009). Estar=Ser+P. Paper presented at the XIX Colloquium on Generative Grammar. Universidad del País Vasco, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain: April 1–3, 2009.
García Fernández, L. (2006). Diccionario de perífrasis verbales. Madrid, Spain: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gómez Torrego, L. (1999). Los verbos auxiliares. Las perífrasis verbales de infinitivo. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Dir.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 3321–3390). Madrid, Spain: RAE/Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, K. (1992). Non verbal predication. Berlín, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hernanz, M.L. (2011). Sobre la periferia de los infinitivos. In M.V. Escandell-Vidal, M. Leonetti & C. Sánchez López (Eds.), 60 problemas de gramática (pp. 263–270). Madrid, Spain: Akal.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornstein, N. (2001). Move! A minimalist theory of construal. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, M., Pelletier, F.J., Carlson, G.N., ter Meulen, A., Chierchia, G., & Link, G. (1995). Genericity: An introduction. In G.N. Carlson & F.J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 1–124). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.Y. (1972). Categorical and thetic judgments: Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language, 9, 153–185.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laca, B. (1990). Generic objects: Some more pieces to the puzzle. Lingua, 81, 25–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenci, A. (1995). The semantics representation of non-quantificational habituals. In P.M. Bertinetto, V. Bianchi, J. Higginbotham & M. Squartini (Eds.), Temporal reference, aspect and actionality. Vol 2, Typological perspectives (pp. 143–158). Turin, Italy: Rosemberg & Sellier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenci, A., & Bertinetto, P.M. (2000). Aspects, adverbs and events. Habituality vs. perfectivity . In P. Bertinetto, V. Bianchi, J. Higginbotham, F. Pianesi & A.C. Varzi (Eds.), Speaking of events (pp. 245–287). Nueva York, NY and Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leonetti, M. (1998). A relevance-theoretic approach to the property predication restriction. In A. Jucker & V. Rouchota (Eds.), Current issues in relevance theory (pp. 143–169). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1994). Ser y estar: estado de la cuestión. Barataria, 1, 182–205.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marantz, A. (2001). Words. Handout of West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics XX. University of Southern California, Los Ángeles, CA: February 23–25, 2001.
Mateu, J. (2002). Argument structure: relational construal at the syntax-semantics interface (Doctoral Dissertation). Barcelona, Spain: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milsark, G. (1977). Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis, 3, 1–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Obata, M. (2010). Root, successive-cyclic and feature-splitting internal merge: Implications for feature-inheritance and transfer (Doctoral Dissertation). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
RAE-ASALE (2009). Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid, Spain: RAE/Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raposo, E., & Uriagereka, J. (1995). Two types of small clauses (toward a syntax of theme/rheme relations). In A. Cardinaletti & M.T. Guasti (Eds.), Small clauses (pp. 179–206). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, H. (1990). Functional preposition. In H. Pinkster & I. Genée (Eds.), Unity in diversity. Papers presented to Simon Dik on his 50th birthday (pp. 229–241). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romeu, J. (this volume). Ser, estar and two different modifiers.
Smith, C.S. (1991). The parameter of aspect. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svenonius, P. (2007). Adpositions, particles and the arguments they introduce. In E. Reuland, T. Bhattacharya & G. Spathas (eds.), Argument structure (pp. 63–103). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torrego, E. (2006). Predication with characterizing sentences in Spanish. In B. Fernández & I. Laka (Coord.), Andolin gogoan. Essays in honor of professor Eguzkitza (pp. 835–853). Bilbao, Spain: Publicaciones de la Universidad del País Vasco-EHU.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tortora, C.M. (2008). Aspect inside PLACE PPs. In A. Asbury, J. Dotlačil, B. Gehrke, Ø. Nilsen & R. Nouwen (Eds.), The syntax and semantics of spatial P (pp. 273–301). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66, 143–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zagona, K. (2012). Ser and estar: Phrase structure and aspect. In C. Nishida & C. Russi (Eds.), Building a bridge between linguistic communities of the Old and the New World, Cahiers Chronos, 25 (pp. 303–327). Amsterdam, The Netherlands and New York, NY: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ziegeler, D. (2008). Propositional aspect and the development of modal inferences in English. In W. Abraham & E. Leiss (Eds.), Modality-aspect interfaces. Implications and typological solutions (pp. 43–80). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2024. Capturing meaningful generalizations at varying degrees of resolution. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Portero-Muñoz, Carmen
2022. “It’s way too intriguing!” The fuzzy status of emergent intensifiers: A Functional Discourse Grammar account. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 618 ff. DOI logo
Silvagni, Federico
2022. Whenestaris not there: A cross-linguistic analysis of individual/stage-level copular sentences in Romance. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 108 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue