In:Recent Developments in Hispanic Linguistics: Studies in structure, variation, and bilingualism
Edited by Michael Gradoville and Sean McKinnon
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 41] 2024
► pp. 24–43
Chapter 1When left dislocation meets epithets
Published online: 4 October 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.41.01li
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.41.01li
Abstract
In Spanish syntax, a clitic left-dislocated constituent may incorporate a coreferential epithet
within the sentence, along with a clitic as a resumptive element. In previous research, there exist three approaches
to the relationships among the dislocated constituent, the clitic, and the epithet. The first suggests the dislocated
constituent is originally generated in its surface position. The second argues it originates in a small clause with
the epithet, then moves to the left periphery. The third contends the constituent is part of a distinct clause,
truncated by ellipsis. This study examines ditransitive verb structures featuring epithets in Peninsular Spanish,
advocating that the left dislocation with an internal epithet results from syntactic movement, contributing new
insights to this ongoing debate.
Keywords: clitic left dislocation, movement, predication, epithet
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous analyses
- 2.1CLLD+epithet in Suñer (2006)
- 2.2CLLD+epithet in López (2009)
- 2.3CLLD+epithet in Estigarribia (2017, 2020)
- 3.A closer look at CLLD+epithet
- 3.1Problems of the bi-clausal account
- 3.1.1Number mismatch exists in small clauses
- 3.1.2Impossible ellipsis
- 3.2CLLD+epithet is a case of movement out of a small clause
- 3.2.1Syntactic assumptions of small clauses
- 3.2.2Justification for the movement out of a small clause approach
- 3.1Problems of the bi-clausal account
- 4.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (44)
Alexiadou, A. (2008). Left
dislocation (including CLLD). In M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The
Blackwell Companion to
Syntax (pp. 668–699). Wiley-Blackwell.
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist
inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step
by step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in honor of Howard
Lasnik (pp. 89–156). MIT Press.
Cuervo, M. C. (2003). Structural
asymmetries but same word order: the dative alternation in
Spanish. In A. M.di Sciullo (Ed.), Asymmetry
in
grammar (pp. 117–144). John Benjamins.
Dekydtspotter, L. (1995). Null
operator-variable structures, predication and the interpretive
interface. [Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University].
Dubinsky, S., & Hamilton, R. (1998). Epithets
as antilogophoric pronouns. Linguistic
Inquiry, 29, 685–693.
Epstein, S. (1999). Unprincipled
syntax and the derivation of syntactic
relations. In S. D. Epstein & N. Hornstein (Eds.), Working
Minimalism (pp. 317–345). MIT Press.
Epstein, S., Groat, E., Kawashima, R., & Kitahara, H. (1998). A
derivational approach to syntactic relations. Oxford University Press.
Epstein, S., & Seely, D. (1999). Specifying
the GF ‘subject’: eliminating A-chains and the EPP within a derivational
model. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan.
Escobar, A. (1995). Lefthand
satellites in Spanish. Institute for Language and Speech (OTS) dissertation series.
Estigarribia, B. (2017). The
semantics of Spanish clitic left dislocations with
epithets. Probus, 29(2), 287–321.
(2020). A
biclausal account of clitic left-dislocations with epithets in Rioplatense
Spanish. Glossa: a journal of general
linguistics, 5(1), 1–12.
Iatridou, S. (1991). Clitics
and island effects. Unpublished
manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Johnson, K. (2019). Gapping
and stripping. In J. van Craenenbroeck & T. Temmerman (Eds.), The
Oxford handbook of
ellipsis (pp. 562–604). Oxford University Press.
Kayne, R. (2000). Pronouns
and their antecedents. In S. D. Epstein & T. D. Seely (Eds.), Derivation
and explanation in the Minimalist
Program (pp. 133–166). Wiley-Blackwell.
Ladusaw, W. (1994). Thetic
and categorical, stage and individual, weak and
strong. In M. Harvey & L. Santelmann (Eds.), Proceedings
from Semantics and Linguistic Theory
IV (pp. 220–229). Cornell University.
(2001). Dislocation. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher & W. Raible (eds.), Language
typology and language universals: An international
handbook (pp. 1050–1078). De Gruyter.
Merchant, J. (2001). The
syntax of silence: sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford University Press.
Ott, D. (2014). An
ellipsis approach to contrastive left-dislocation. Linguistic
Inquiry, 45(2), 269–303.
(2016a). Connectivity
in left-dislocation and the composition of the left periphery. Linguistic
Variation, 15(2), 229–290.
Pereltsvaig, A. (2007). Copular
sentences in Russian: a theory of intra-clausal
relations. Springer.
Pineda, A. (2016). Les fronteres de la (in)transitivitat: Estudi dels aplicatius en llengües romàniques i
basc [The borders of (in)transitivity: a study of applicatives in
Romance Languages and Basque]. Institut d’Estadius Món Juïc.
Raposo, E., & Uriagereka, J. (1995). Two
types of small clauses (Toward a syntax of them/rheme
relations). In A. Cardinaletti & M. T. Guasti (Eds.), Syntax
and semantics 28: Small
clauses (pp. 179–206). Academic Press.
Ross, J. R. (1970). Gapping
and the order of constituents. In M. Bierwisch & K. Heidolph (Eds.), Progress
in
linguistics (pp. 249–259). de Gruyter.
Swart, W. (2000). Issues
relating to a derivational theory of
binding. In S. D. Epstein & T. D. Seely (Eds.), Derivation
and explanation in the Minimalist
Program (pp. 269–304). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Vallduví, E. (1988). Functional
load, prosody and syntax: Left-detachment in Catalan and
Spanish. CLS, 24, 391–404.
Villalba, X. (2000). The
syntax of sentence periphery. [Doctoral
dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona].
