In:Revisiting Modality: A corpus-based study of epistemic adverbs in Galician
Vítor Míguez
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 40] 2024
► pp. 201–215
Bibliography
Published online: 16 April 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.40.refs
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.40.refs
Aguete Cajiao, A. (2020). Contacto
de linguas e variedades na emerxencia de novos modelos de vocalismo
galego. In F. Dubert-García, V. Míguez, & X. Sousa (Eds.), Variedades
lingüísticas en contacto na Península
Ibérica (pp. 155–193). Consello da Cultura Galega.
Aijmer, K. (2016). Modality
and mood in functional linguistic approaches. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and
mood (pp. 495–513). Oxford University Press.
(2016). Sentence
types. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and
mood (pp. 141–165). Oxford University Press.
Albelda Marco, M. (2010). ¿Cómo
se reconoce la atenuación? Una aproximación metodológica basada en el español peninsular
hablado. In F. Orletti & L. Mariottini (Eds.), (Des)cortesía
en español: espacios teóricos y metodológicos para su
estudio (pp. 47–70). Università degli Studi Roma Tre / EDICE.
(2016). Estableciendo
límites entre la evidencialidad y la atenuación en español. In R. González Ruiz, D. Izquierdo Alegría, & Ó. Loureda Lamas (Eds.), La evidencialidad en español: teoría y
descripción (pp. 75–100). Iberoamericana / Vervuert.
(2018). La
variación genérico-discursiva de la atenuación como resultado de la variación de la imagen. Spanish in
Context, 15(2), 346–368.
Albelda Marco, M., & Cestero Mancera, A. M. (2011). De
nuevo, sobre los procedimientos de atenuación lingüística. Español
actual, 96, 9–40.
Albelda Marco, M., & Estellés Arguedas, M. (2021a). De
nuevo sobre la intensificación pragmática: revisión y propuesta. Estudios
Románicos, 30, 15–37.
(2021b). Mitigation
revisited. An operative and integrated definition of the pragmatic concept, its strategic values, and its linguistic
expression. Journal of
Pragmatics, 183, 71–86.
Álvarez, R. (2019). Galician
linguistics: between Hispanic philological tradition and visibility in the Luso-Brazilian
sphere. In G. Rei-Doval & F. Tejedo-Herrero (Eds.), Lusophone,
Galician, and Hispanic linguistics: bridging frames and
traditions (pp. 92–112). Routledge.
Ameka, F. K., & Kropp Dakubu, M. E. (Eds.). (2008). Aspect
and modality in Kwa languages. John Benjamins.
Arppe, A. (2013). Polytomous:
polytomous logistic regression for fixed and mixed effects [0.1.6]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Arregui, A., Rivero, M. L., & Salanova, A. (Eds.). (2017). Modality
across syntactic categories. Oxford University Press.
Ayoun, D., Celle, A., & Lansari, L. (Eds.). (2018). Tense,
aspect, modality, and evidentiality: crosslinguistic perspectives. John Benjamins.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The
dialogic imagination: four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist,
Trans.). University of Texas Press.
Bally, C. (1965). Linguistique
générale et linguistique française (4th ed.). Francke Berne. (Original work published 1932)
Beeching, K., & Detges, U. (2014). Introduction. In K. Beeching & U. Detges (Eds.), Discourse
functions at the left and right periphery: crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language
change (pp. 1–23). Brill.
Bellert, I. (1977). On
semantic and distributional properties of sentential adverbs. Linguistic
Inquiry, 8(2), 337–351. [URL]
Berbeira Gardón, J. L. (1998). Relevance
and modality. Revista Alicantina de Estudios
Ingleses, 11, 3–22.
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1988). Adverbial
stance types in English. Discourse
Processes, 11(1), 1–34.
Böhm, V. (2016). La
imperfectividad en la prensa española y su relación con las categorías semánticas de modalidad y
evidencialidad. Peter Lang.
Bolkestein, A. M. (1980). Problems
in the description of modal verbs: an investigation of Latin. Van Gorcum.
Boogaart, R. (2011). Imperfective
aspect and epistemic modality. In A. Patard & F. Brisard (Eds.), Cognitive
approaches to tense, aspect, and epistemic
modality (pp. 217–248). John Benjamins.
Boogaart, R., & Fortuin, E. (2016). Modality
and mood in Cognitive Linguistics and Construction Grammars. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and
mood (pp. 514–534). Oxford University Press.
Boye, K. (2012). Epistemic
meaning: a crosslinguistic and functional-cognitive study. De Gruyter Mouton.
Brenes Peña, E. (2011). Descortesía
verbal y tertulia televisiva. Análisis pragmalingüístico. Peter Lang.
Brisard, F. (2006). Logic,
subjectivity, and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. In A. Athanasiadou, C. Canakis, & B. Cornillie (Eds.), Subjectification:
various paths to
subjectivity (pp. 41–74). De Gruyter Mouton.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness:
some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Butler, C. S. (2003). Structure
and function: a guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part I: approaches to the simplex
clause. John Benjamins.
Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The
evolution of grammar: tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. University of Chicago Press.
Byloo, P., Kastein, R., & Nuyts, J. (2007). On
certainly and zeker. In M. Hannay & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Structural-functional
studies in English grammar: in honour of Lachlan
Mackenzie (pp. 35–57). John Benjamins.
Carnap, R. (1947). Meaning
and necessity: a study in semantics and modal logic. University of Chicago Press.
Carretero, M., & Zamorano-Mansilla, J. R. (2019). Disentangling
epistemic modality, neighbouring categories and pragmatic uses: the case of English epistemic modal
adverbs. In Quinze études de cas sur les modalités linguistiques / Fifteen case
studies on types of linguistic
modalities (pp. 131–157). Publications Electroniques de l’ERIAC. [URL]
Centro Ramón Piñeiro para a investigación en
humanidades. (2022). Corpus de Referencia do Galego Actual [4.0]. [URL]
Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality
in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality:
the linguistic coding of
epistemology (pp. 261–273). Ablex.
(1994). Discourse,
consciousness, and time: the flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. The University of Chicago Press.
Chung, S., & Timberlake, A. (1985). Tense,
aspect, mood. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language
typology and syntactic description. III. Grammatical categories and the
lexicon (pp. 202–258). Cambridge University Press.
Cidrás, F. (2016). Why
do they say ‘I know’ when they mean ‘I really don’t know’? Semantic change and constructionalization of Galician particle
seica [Unpublished manuscript].
Cidrás, F., & Dubert-García, F. (2017). A
gramática galega, un río de curso curto e sinuoso. Panorama histórico dos estudios gramaticais sobre o
galego. Labor
Histórico, 3(1), 111–125.
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect:
an introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge University Press.
Cornillie, B. (2008). On
the grammaticalization and (inter)subjectivity of evidential (semi-)auxiliaries in
Spanish. In E. Seoane & M. J. López-Couso (Eds.), Theoretical
and empirical issues in
grammaticalization (pp. 55–76). John Benjamins.
(2009). Evidentiality
and epistemic modality: on the close relationship between two different categories. Functions of
Language, 16(1), 44–62.
(2010). On
conceptual semantics and discourse functions: the case of Spanish modal adverbs in informal
conversation. Review of Cognitive
Linguistics, 8(2), 300–320.
(2015). Más
allá de la epistemicidad: las funciones discursivas de los adverbios epistémicos y evidenciales en el español
conversacional. Spanish in
Context, 12(1), 120–139.
(2016). Acerca
de la locución epistémica tal vez en el Siglo de las Luces: innovación y
especialización. In M. Guzmán & D. Sáez (Eds.), Márgenes
y centros en el español del siglo
XVIII (pp. 183–199). Tirant Humanidades.
Costa Casas, X. X., González Refoxo, M. d. A., Morán Fraga, C. C., & Rábade Castiñeira, X. C. (1988). Nova
gramática para a aprendizaxe da língua. Vía Láctea.
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Thompson, S. A. (2000). Concessive
patterns in conversation. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & B. Kortmann (Eds.), Cause –
condition – concession – contrast: cognitive and discourse
perspectives (pp. 381–410). Mouton de Gruyter.
Croissant, Y. (2020). Mlogit:
multinomial logit models [1.1–1]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Cruschina, S., & Remberger, E.-M. (2008). Hearsay
and reported speech: evidentiality in Romance. Rivista di grammatica
generativa, 33, 95–116.
Dahl, Ö. (2000). The
grammar of future time reference in European languages. In Ö. Dahl (Ed.), Tense
and aspect in the languages of
Europe (pp. 309–328). Mouton de Gruyter.
Davidse, K., Van linden, A., & Brems, L. (2022). A
semiotic approach to grammaticalization: modelling representational and interpersonal modality expressed by verbonominal
patterns. Language
Sciences, 91, 101473.
Declerck, R. (2009). ‘Not-yet-factual
at time t’: a neglected modal concept. In R. Salkie, P. Busuttil, & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), Modality in English: theory and
description (pp. 31–54). Mouton de Gruyter.
(2011). The
definition of modality. In A. Patard & F. Brisard (Eds.), Cognitive
approaches to tense, aspect and epistemic
modality (pp. 21–44). John Benjamins.
Degand, L. (2014). ‘So
very fast then’ Discourse markers at left and right periphery in spoken
French. In K. Beeching & U. Detges (Eds.), Discourse
functions at the left and right periphery: crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language
change (pp. 151–178). Brill.
de Haan, F. (2001). The
place of inference within the evidential system. International Journal of American
Linguistics, 67(2), 193–219.
(2006). Typological
approaches to modality. In W. Frawley (Ed.), The
expression of
modality (pp. 27–69). Mouton de Gruyter.
Delbecque, N. (2009). Acerca
de la relación entre cierto y seguro. In M. Veyrat Rigat & E. Serra Alegre (Eds.), La lingüística como reto epistemológico y como
acción social. Estudios dedicados al Profesor Ángel López García con ocasión de su sexagésimo
aniversario (pp. 629–644, Vol. 2). Arco Libros.
Depraetere, I., & Reed, S. (2011). Towards
a more explicit taxonomy of root possibility. English Language and
Linguistics, 15(1), 1–29.
de Saussure, L., Moeschler, J., & Puskas, G. (Eds.). (2007). Tense,
mood and aspect: theoretical and descriptive issues. Rodopi.
Deshors, S. C., & Waltermire, M. (2019). The
indicative vs. subjunctive alternation with expressions of possibility in Spanish: a multifactorial
analysis. International Journal of Corpus
Linguistics, 24(1), 67–97.
Diewald, G. (2002). A
model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer & G. Diewald (Eds.), New
reflections on
grammaticalization (pp. 103–120). John Benjamins.
Dik, S. C. (1997). The
theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: the structure of the clause (K. Hengeveld, Ed.; 2nd
ed.). Mouton de Gruyter.
Dixon, R. M. W. (2009). The
semantics of clause linking in typological perspective. In R. M. W. Dixon & A. Y. Aikhenvald (Eds.), The
semantics of clause linking: a cross-linguistic
typology (pp. 1–55). Oxford University Press.
Downing, A. (2001). “Surely
you knew!”: surely as a marker of evidentiality and stance. Functions of
Language, 8(2), 251–282.
Dryer, M. S., & Haspelmath, M. (Eds.). (2013). The
world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The
stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking
in discourse (pp. 139–182). John Benjamins.
Eckardt, R., & Beltrama, A. (2019). Evidentials
and questions. In C. Pinon (Ed.), Empirical
issues in syntax and semantics 12
(pp. 121–155). CSSP. [URL]
Elliot, J. R. (2000). Realis
and irrealis: forms and concepts of the grammaticalisation of reality. Linguistic
Typology, 4(1), 55–90.
Espejo Muriel, M. d. M., & Espinosa Elorza, R. M. (2012). Quiçab,
quiçá, quizá. In E. Montero Cartelle & C. Manzano Rovira (Eds.), Actas del VIII Congreso Internacional de
Historia de la Lengua Española: Santiago de Compostela, 14–18 de septiembre de
2009 (pp. 749–760, Vol. 1). Meubook.
Evans, N. (2007). Insubordination
and its uses. In I. Nikolaeva (Ed.), Finiteness:
theoretical and empirical
foundations (pp. 366–431). Oxford University Press.
Figueras Bates, C. (2018). Atenuación,
género discursivo e imagen. Spanish in
Context, 15(2), 258–280.
Foley, W. A., & Van Valin, R. D. J. (1984). Functional
syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge University Press.
(2005). Os
marcadores discursivos. Conectores contraargumentativos no galego escrito. Universidade da Coruña. [URL]
(2006a). Gramática
da lingua galega. II. Morfosintaxe (2nd ed.). A Nosa Terra. (Original work published 2000)
(2006b). Gramática
da lingua galega. IV. Gramática do texto (2nd ed.). A Nosa Terra. (Original work published 2003)
García Represas, D. (2000). L’expression
du doute en galicien. In A. Englebert, M. Pierrard, L. Rosier, & D. Van Raemdonck (Eds.), Actes du XXIIe Congrès International de
Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes (Bruxelles, 23–29 juillet
1998) (pp. 269–276, Vol. 7). Max Niemeyer.
Garson, J. (2018). Modal
Logic. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford
encyclopedia of philosophy. [URL]
Gavins, J. (2005). (Re)thinking
modality: a text-world perspective. Journal of Literary
Semantics, 34(2), 79–93.
Gerards, D. P., & Kabatek, J. (2018). Grammaticalization,
distance, immediacy and discourse traditions: the case of Portuguese
caso. In S. Pons Bordería & Ó. Loureda Lamas (Eds.), Beyond grammaticalization and discourse markers:
new issues in the study of language
change (pp. 115–159). Brill.
Giannakidou, A., & Mari, A. (2018). A
unified analysis of the future as epistemic modality: the view from Greek and Italian. Natural Language
& Linguistic
Theory, 36(1), 85–129.
Gisborne, N. (2007). Dynamic
modality. SKASE Journal of Theoretical
Linguistics, 4(2), 44–61. [URL]
Givón, T. (1982). Evidentiality
and epistemic space. Studies in
Language, 6(1), 23–45.
(1984). Syntax:
a functional-typological introduction (Vol. 1). John Benjamins.
(1994). Irrealis
and the subjunctive. Studies in
Language, 18(2), 265–337.
(2001). Syntax:
an introduction (2nd
ed., Vol. 1). John Benjamins.
González Vázquez, M. (2006). Las
fuentes de la información: tipología, semántica y pragmática de la evidencialidad. Universidade de Vigo.
González-Vázquez, M. (2021). The
evidentiality system in Galician and the seica marker. Journal of
Pragmatics, 178, 83–92.
Goossens, L. (1985). Modality
and the modals: a problem for Functional Grammar. In A. M. Bolkestein, C. de Groot, & J. L. Mackenzie (Eds.), Predicates
and terms in Functional
Grammar (pp. 203–217). Foris.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic
and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Speech
acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Gries, S. T. (2013). Statistics
for linguistics with R: a practical introduction (2nd ed.). De Gruyter Mouton.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1970a). Functional
diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of
Language, 6(3), 322–361. [URL]
(1970b). Language
structure and language function. In J. Lyons (Ed.), New
horizons in
linguistics (pp. 140–165). Penguin.
(2004). An
introduction to Functional Grammar (C. M. I. M. Matthiesen, Ed.; 3rd
ed.). Hodder Arnold.
(2014). Halliday’s
introduction to Functional Grammar (C. M. I. M. Matthiesen, Ed.; 4th
ed.). Routledge.
Harris, A. C., & Campbell, L. (1995). Historical
syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Hatav, G. (1997). The
semantics of aspect and modality: evidence from English and Biblical Hebrew. John Benjamins.
Hengeveld, K. (1987). Clause
structure and modality in Functional Grammar. In J. van der Auwera & L. Goossens (Eds.), Ins
and outs of the
predication (pp. 53–66). Foris.
(1988). Illocution,
mood and modality in a functional grammar of Spanish. Journal of
Semantics, 6, 227–269.
(2004). Illocution,
mood and modality. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann, & J. Mugdan (Eds.), Morphology:
an international handbook on inflection and
word-formation (pp. 1190–1201, Vol. 2). Mouton de Gruyter.
Hennemann, A. (2014). The
Spanish synthetic future as a means of expression of inference. Studies in Literature and
Language, 9(1), 11–26.
Hickmann, M., & Bassano, D. (2016). Modality
and mood in first language acquisition. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and
mood (pp. 430–447). Oxford University Press.
Hilpert, M., Cappelle, B., & Depraetere, I. (Eds.). (2021). Modality
and Diachronic Construction Grammar. John Benjamins.
Hirota, H. (2021). The
indicative/subjunctive mood alternation with adverbs of doubt in Spanish. Journal of Quantitative
Linguistics, 1–15.
Hogeweg, L., de Hoop, H., & Malchukov, A. (Eds.). (2009). Cross-linguistic
semantics of tense, aspect, and modality. John Benjamins.
Hollebrandse, B., van Hout, A., & Vet, C. (Eds.). (2005). Crosslinguistic
views on tense, aspect and modality. Rodopi.
Hopper, P. J. (1991). On
some principles of grammaticization. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches
to
grammaticalization (pp. 17–35, Vol. 1). John Benjamins.
Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied
logistic regression (3rd ed.). Wiley.
Hummel, M. (2013). La
dimensión intercultural de la expansión diacrónica de los adverbios en
-mente. In M. P. Garcés Gómez (Ed.), Los adverbios con función discursiva: procesos de
formación y
evolución (pp. 15–41). Iberoamericana / Vervuert.
(2018). Romance
sentence adverbs in -mente: epistemic mitigation in synchrony and diachrony. Linguistik
online, 92(5), 111–144.
Iwasaki, S. (1993). Subjectivity
in grammar and discourse: theoretical considerations and a case study of Japanese spoken discourse. John Benjamins.
Izquierdo Alegría, D. (2019). ¿Qué
tipo de información codifica realmente un evidencial? Propuesta de una distinción conceptual entre fuente,
base y modo de acceso para el reconocimiento de unidades
evidenciales. Estudios
filológicos, 63, 211–236.
Izquierdo Alegría, D., González Ruiz, R., & Loureda Lamas, Ó. (2016). Un
acercamiento a los fundamentos de la evidencialidad y a su recepción y tratamiento en la lingüística
hispánica. In R. González Ruiz, D. Izquierdo Alegría, & Ó. Loureda Lamas (Eds.), La evidencialidad en español: teoría y
descripción (pp. 9–45). Iberoamericana / Vervuert.
Janda, L. A. (2015). Tense,
aspect and mood. In E. Dabrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook
of Cognitive
Lingusitics (pp. 616–634). De Gruyter Mouton.
Jarrett, D. S. (2022). Epistemic
adverbs of low speaker-commitment in Colombian Spanish [Doctoral dissertation, Indiana
University]. [URL]
Jiménez Juliá, T. (1989). Modalidad,
modo verbal y modus clausal en
español. Verba, 16, 175–214. [URL]
Kärkkäinen, E. (2003). Epistemic
stance in English conversation: a description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I
think. John Benjamins.
Kehayov, P. (2017). The fate
of mood and modality in language death: evidence from minor Finnic. De Gruyter.
Kotwica, D. (2020). Mitigation
and reinforcement in general knowledge expressions. Journal of
Pragmatics, 169, 219–230.
Kratzer, A. (1977). What
‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean. Linguistics and
Philosophy, 1(3), 337–355.
(2002). The
notional category of modality. In P. Portner & B. H. Partee (Eds.), Formal
semantics: the essential
readings (pp. 289–323). Blackwell. (Original work published 1981)
Krawczak, K. (2016). Objectivity,
subjectivity and intersubjectivity: integrating two Cognitive-Functional theories. Functions of
Language, 23(2), 179–213.
Kuo, Y. H. (2022). Bidirectionality
between modal and conditional constructions in Mandarin Chinese: a constructionalization
account. Diachronica, 39(1), 88–127.
Kuteva, T. (1998). On
identifying an evasive gram: action narrowly averted. Studies in
Language, 22(1), 113–160.
Labov, W. (1984). Intensity. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning,
form, and use in context: linguistic
applications (pp. 43–70). Georgtown University Press. [URL]
Lampert, G., & Lampert, M. (2000). The
conceptual structure(s) of modality: essences and ideologies. Peter Lang.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations
of Cognitive Grammar. I. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
Lassiter, D. (2017). Graded
modality: qualitative and quantitative perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Lazard, G. (1999). Mirativity,
evidentiality, mediativity, or other? Linguistic
Typology, 3(1), 91–109.
Leiss, E. (2008). The
silent and aspect-driven patterns of deonticity and epistemicity: a chapter in diachronic
typology. In W. Abraham & E. Leiss (Eds.), Modality-aspect
interfaces: implications and typological
solutions (pp. 15–41). John Benjamins.
Levshina, N. (2015). How
to do linguistics with R: data exploration and statistical analysis. John Benjamins.
Littell, P., Matthewson, L., & Peterson, T. (2010). On
the semantics of conjectural questions. In T. Peterson & U. Sauerland (Eds.), Evidence
from
evidentials (pp. 89–104). University of British Columbia. [URL]
López-Couso, M. J. (2010). Subjectification
and intersubjectification. In A. H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (Eds.), Historical
pragmatics (pp. 127–163). De Gruyter Mouton.
López-Couso, M. J., & Méndez-Naya, B. (2021). From
complementizing to modifying status: on the grammaticalization of the complement-taking-predicate-clauses chances are and
odds are. Language
Sciences, 88, 101422.
(2023). From
chance to epistemic possibility: on the grammaticalization of happenstance expressions in
English. In H. De Smet, P. Petré, & B. Szmrecsanyi (Eds.), Context,
intent and variation in
grammaticalization (pp. 109–134). De Gruyter Mouton.
Lorenzo, R. (1977). La
traducción gallega de la Crónica General y de la Crónica de
Castilla (Vol. 2). Instituto de Estudios Orensanos Padre Feijóo.
Loureiro-Porto, L. (2014). Modal
necessity and impersonality in English and Galician. In J. I. Marín-Arrese, M. Carretero, J. Arús Hita, & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), English modality: core, periphery and
evidentiality (pp. 171–200). De Gruyter Mouton.
Lunn, P. V. (1995). The
evaluative function of the Spanish subjunctive. In J. Bybee & S. Fleischman (Eds.), Modality
in grammar and
discourse (pp. 429–449). John Benjamins.
Malchukov, A., & Xrakovskij, V. S. (2016). The
linguistic interaction of mood with modality and other categories. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and
mood (pp. 196–220). Oxford University Press.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The
language of evaluation: appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
Matte Bon, F. (1995). Gramática
Comunicativa del español. II. De la idea a la lengua (2nd
ed.). Edelsa.
Mauri, C., & Sansò, A. (2016). The
linguistic marking of (ir)realis and subjunctive. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and
mood (pp. 166–195). Oxford University Press.
Menzel, C. (2016). Possible
worlds. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford
encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University Press. [URL]
Meyer, D., Zeileis, A., & Hornik, K. (2022). vcd:
visualizing categorical data [1.4–10]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Míguez, V. (2019). On
(un)certainty: the semantic evolution of Galician
seguramente. In C. Pinon (Ed.), Empirical
issues in syntax and semantics 12
(pp. 217–246). CSSP. [URL]
(2021). The
diachrony of Galician certamente and seguramente: a case of grammatical
constructionalization. In M. Hilpert, B. Cappelle, & I. Depraetere (Eds.), Modality
and diachronic construction
grammar (pp. 123–148). John Benjamins.
(2022). On
epistemic modality and discourse strategy: evidence from Galician adverbs. Journal of
Pragmatics, 201, 32–42.
(2023). A
expresión da incerteza nos textos de CORTEGAL: un achegamento
paradigmático. In M. Álvarez de la Granja & V. Míguez (Eds.), Perspectivas
sobre a escrita académica en galego. Estudos baseados no corpus CORTEGAL de textos escritos por
estudantes (pp. 325–352). Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.
Montero Küpper, S. (1999). A
categoría da modalidade en alemán e galego. In D. Kremer (Ed.), Actas
do V Congreso Internacional de Estudios
Galegos (pp. 727–737, Vol. 1). Centro de Documentación de Galicia da Universidade de Trier.
Mortelmans, T. (2007). Modality
in Cognitive Linguistics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The
Oxford hanbook of Cognitive
Linguistics (pp. 869–889). Oxford University Press.
Narrog, H. (2005a). Modality,
mood, and change of modal meanings: a new perspective. Cognitive
Linguistics, 16(4), 677–731.
(2008). The
aspect-modality link in the Japanese verbal complex and beyond. In W. Abraham & E. Leiss (Eds.), Modality-aspect
interfaces: implications and typological
solutions (pp. 279–307). John Benjamins.
(2009). Modality
in Japanese: the layered structure of the clause and hierarchies of functional categories. John Benjamins.
(2012). Modality,
subjectivity, and semantic change: a crosslinguistic perspective. Oxford University Press.
(2016). Three
types of subjectivity, three types of intersubjectivity, their dynamicization and a
synthesis. In D. Olmen, H. Cuyckens, & L. Ghesquière (Eds.), Aspects
of grammaticalization: (inter)subjectification and
directionality (pp. 19–46). De Gruyter.
Nauze, F. D. (2008). Modality
in typological perspective. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation. [URL]
Nikolaeva, I. (2016). Analyses
of the semantics of mood. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and
mood (pp. 68–85). Oxford University Press.
Nolan, B. (2008). Modality
in RRG: towards a characterisation using Irish data. In R. D. J. Van Valin (Ed.), Investigations of the syntax–semantics–pragmatics
interface (pp. 147–159). John Benjamins.
Nuyts, J. (1992). Aspects of
a cognitive-pragmatic theory of language: on cognition, functionalism and grammar. John Benjamins.
(2001a). Epistemic
modality, language, and conceptualization: a cognitive-pragmatic perspective. John Benjamins.
(2001b). Subjectivity
as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of
Pragmatics, 33(3), 383–400.
(2005). The
modal confusion: on terminology and the concepts behind it. In A. Klinge & H. Høeg Müller (Eds.), Modality: studies in form and
function (pp. 5–38). Equinox.
(2006). Modality:
overview and linguistic issues. In W. Frawley (Ed.), The
expression of
modality (pp. 1–26). Mouton de Gruyter.
(2009). The
“one-commitment-per-clause” principle and the cognitive status of qualificational
categories. Linguistics, 47, 141–171.
(2012). Notions
of (inter)subjectivity. English Text
Construction, 5(1), 53–76.
(2014). Subjectivity
in modality, and beyond. In A. Zuczkowski, R. Bongelli, I. Riccioni, & C. Canestrari (Eds.), Communicating
certainty and uncertainty in medical, supportive and scientific
contexts (pp. 13–30). John Benjamins.
(2016). Analyses
of the modal meanings. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and
mood (pp. 31–49). Oxford University Press.
(2017). Evidentiality
reconsidered. In J. I. Marín Arrese, G. Haßler, & M. Carretero (Eds.), Evidentiality
revisited: cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic
perspectives (pp. 57–83). John Benjamins.
Nuyts, J., & Byloo, P. (2015). Competing
modals: beyond
(inter)subjectification. Diachronica, 32(1), 34–68.
Nuyts, J., Byloo, P., & Diepeveen, J. (2010). On
deontic modality, directivity, and mood: the case of Dutch mogen and
moeten. Journal of
Pragmatics, 42(1), 16–34.
Nuyts, J., & van der Auwera, J. (Eds.). (2016). The
Oxford handbook of modality and mood. Oxford University Press.
Ochs, E. (1996). Linguistic
resources for socializing humanity. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking
linguistic
relativity (pp. 407–437). Cambridge University Press.
Olbertz, H., & Dall’Aglio Hattnher, M. M. (2018). On
objective and subjective epistemic modality again: evidence from Portuguese and Spanish modal
auxiliaries. In E. Keizer & H. Olbertz (Eds.), Recent
developments in Functional Discourse
Grammar (pp. 132–168). John Benjamins.
Oliveira, T. (2015). Between
evidentiality and epistemic modality: the case of the future and the conditional in European
Portuguese. Belgian Journal of
Linguistics, 29, 101–122.
Patard, A., & Brisard, F. (Eds.). (2011). Cognitive
approaches to tense, aspect, and epistemic modality. John Benjamins.
Pic, E., & Furmaniak, G. (2012). A
study of epistemic modality in academic and popularised discourse: the case of possibility adverbs perhaps,
maybe and possibly. Revista de Lenguas para Fines
Específicos, 18, 13–44. [URL]
Pietrandrea, P. (2005). Epistemic
modality: functional properties and the Italian system. John Benjamins.
(2008). Certamente
and sicuramente: encoding dynamic and discursive aspects of commitment in Italian. Belgian
Journal of
Linguistics, 22(1), 221–246.
Pinto de Lima, J. (2008). Ongoing
lexicalization and grammaticalization: a case from European Portuguese. In M. C. Almeida, B. Sieberg, & A. M. Bernardo (Eds.), Questions
on language
change (pp. 49–67). Colibri.
R Core Team. (2022). R: a language and environment
for statistical computing [4.2.1]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Regueira, X. L. (2022). Language
as object of research versus language as political object: old and new horizons in the study of
Galician. In O. Castro, D. Baena, M. A. R. López, & M. Sánchez Moreiras (Eds.), Gender, displacement, and cultural networks
of Galicia: 1800s to
present (pp. 27–61). Palgrave Macmillan.
Rivas, J., & Sánchez-Ayala, I. (2012). Procesos
de gramaticalización en el desarrollo de las aportaciones reactivas: el caso de
efectivamente. In E. Montero Cartelle & C. Manzano Rovira (Eds.), Actas del VIII Congreso Internacional de
Historia de la Lengua
Española (pp. 2363–2374, Vol. 2). Meubook.
Rodríguez Rosique, S. (2017). The
future of necessity in Spanish: modality, evidentiality and deictic projection at the
crossroads. In J. I. Marín-Arrese, J. Lavid-López, M. Carretero, E. Domínguez Romero, M. V. Martín de la Rosa, & M. Pérez Blanco (Eds.), Evidentiality and modality in European
languages: discourse-pragmatic perspectives. Peter Lang.
Rodríguez-Espiñeira, M. J. (2010). Modalidad,
gramática y discurso: posible, probable y sus
antónimos. In M. J. Rodríguez-Espiñeira (Ed.), Adjetivos
en discurso. Emociones, certezas, posibilidades y
evidencias (pp. 181–253). Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.
(2019). La
expresión epistémica si cuadra en español de Galicia. Estudos de Lingüística
Galega, 11, 197–231.
Rosales Sequeiros, X. (2000). Uso
interpretativo de la lengua: disque y seica en lengua
gallega. In F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Coord.), Panorama actual de la lingüística
aplicada (pp. 375–386, Vol. 1). Universidad de La Rioja.
San Roque, L., Floyd, S., & Norcliffe, E. (2017). Evidentiality
and
interrogativity. Lingua, 186, 120–143.
Santamarina, A., González Seoane, E., & Álvarez de la Granja, M. (2018). Tesouro
Informatizado da Lingua Galega [4.1]. Instituto da Lingua Galega. [URL]
Schneider, S. (2017). Las
dimensiones de la intensificación y de la atenuación. In M. Albelda Marco & W. Mihatsch (Eds.), Atenuación
e intensificación en géneros
discursivos (pp. 23–42). Iberoamericana / Vervuert.
Schoonjans, S. (2019). Modal
particle meanings: new insights from gesture research. Review of Cognitive
Linguistics, 17(2), 303–330.
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. (2000). The
functions of I think in political discourse. International Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 10(1), 41–63.
Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M., & Aijmer, K. (2007). The
semantic field of modal certainty: a corpus-based study of English adverbs. Mouton de Gruyter.
Sousa, X. (2012). Estrategias
evidenciales y expresión de la fuente de información en gallego: los marcadores
gramaticalizados. In X. Viejo Fernández (Ed.), Estudios sobre variación sintáctica
peninsular (pp. 75–98). Trabe.
Squartini, M. (2001). The
internal structure of evidentiality in Romance. Studies in
Language, 25(2), 297–334.
(2016). Interaction
between modality and other semantic categories. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and
mood (pp. 50–67). Oxford University Press.
Stein, D., & Wright, S. (1995). Subjectivity
and subjectivisation: linguistic perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
Stubbs, M. (1986). A
matter of prolonged field work: notes towards a modal grammar of English. Applied
Linguistics, 7(1), 1–25.
Suárez Hernández, A. (2018). Análisis
diacrónico de adverbios con función discursiva: hacia una descripción
lexicográfica. Cilengua. [URL]
Suzuki, D. (2018). The
semantics and pragmatics of modal adverbs: grammaticalization and (inter)subjectification of
perhaps. Lingua, 205, 40–53.
Sweetser, E. (1990). From
etymology to pragmatics: metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge University Press.
Thieroff, R. (2010). Moods,
moods, moods. In B. Rothstein & R. Thieroff (Eds.), Mood
in the languages of
Europe (pp. 1–29). John Benjamins.
Traugott, E. C. (1989). On
the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic
change. Language, 65(1), 31–55.
(2003a). Approaching
modality from the perspective of Relevance Theory. Language
Sciences, 25(6), 657–669.
(2003b). From
subjectification to intersubjectification. In R. Hickey (Ed.), Motives
for language
change (pp. 124–139). Cambridge University Press.
(2006). Historical
aspects of modality. In W. Frawley (Ed.), The
expression of
modality (pp. 107–139). Mouton de Gruyter.
(2007). (Inter)subjectification
and unidirectionality. Journal of Historical
Pragmatics, 8(2), 295–309.
(2010). (Inter)subjectivity
and (inter)subjectification: a reassessment. In K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Subjectification,
intersubjectification and
grammaticalization (pp. 29–71). De Gruyter Mouton.
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization
and constructional changes. Oxford University Press.
Tucker, G. H. (2001). Possibly
alternative modality. Functions of
Language, 8(2), 183–215.
van der Auwera, J., & Ammann, A. (2013a). Epistemic
possibility. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The
world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
(2013b). Overlap
between situational and epistemic modal marking. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The
world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
(2013c). Situational
possibility. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The
world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
van der Auwera, J., & Plungian, V. A. (1998). Modality’s
semantic map. Linguistic
Typology, 2(1), 79–124.
van der Auwera, J., & Zamorano Aguilar, A. (2016). The
history of modality and mood. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and
mood (pp. 9–29). Oxford University Press.
Van linden, A. (2012). Modal
adjectives: English deontic and evaluative constructions in synchrony and diachrony. De Gruyter Mouton.
Van linden, A., & Verstraete, J.-C. (2011). Revisiting
deontic modality and related categories: a conceptual map based on the study of English modal
adjectives. Journal of
Pragmatics, 43(1), 150–163.
Van Olmen, D., & van der Auwera, J. (2016). Modality
and mood in Standard Average European. In J. Nuyts & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and
mood (pp. 362–384). Oxford University Press.
Van Valin, R. D. J., & LaPolla, R. J. (1997). Syntax:
structure, meaning and function. Cambridge University Press.
Varela Barreiro, X. (Dir.). (2007). Tesouro
Medieval Informatizado da Lingua Galega. Instituto da Lingua Galega. [URL]
Veiga, A. (1991). Sobre
a decadencia do subxuntivo en prótases condicionais en galego e español e a subxuntivación da forma
cantara. In M. Brea & F. Fernández Rei (Eds.), Homenaxe ó Profesor Constantino
García (pp. 497–539, Vol. 1). Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. [URL]
(1992). Sobre
a reorganización das oposicións temporais en subxuntivo e subxuntivo irreal na diacronía do verbo
hispánico. In R. Lorenzo (Ed.), Actas
do XIX Congreso Internacional de Lingüística e Filoloxía Románicas. V. Gramática Histórica e Historia da
Lingua (pp. 435–466). Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.
Verstraete, J.-C. (2001). Subjective
and objective modality: interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary
system. Journal of
Pragmatics, 33(10), 1505–1528.
(2005). The
semantics and pragmatics of composite mood marking: the non-Pama-Nyungan languages of northern
Australia. Linguistic
Typology, 9(2), 223–268.
White, P. R. R. (2003). Beyond
modality and hedging: a dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text &
Talk, 23(2), 259–284.
Willett, T. (1988). A
cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in
Language, 12(1), 51–97.