In:Hispanic Linguistics at the Crossroads: Theoretical linguistics, language acquisition and language contact
Edited by Rachel Klassen, Juana M. Liceras and Elena Valenzuela
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 4] 2015
► pp. 233–250
Morphological adjectival intensifier variation in Lima, Peru
Published online: 30 July 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.4.12cer
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.4.12cer
This variationist study is the first addressing the alternation of adjectival intensifiers -ísimo (standard) and -azo (non-standard) in Spanish, concretely, in the Limeño variety of Peru.Using online digitalized corpora, online journals, magazines, and e-networks, I conducted a multivariate analysis of this alternation. The results show that language use in colloquial texts of e-networks favor the use of -azo, as well as male speakers, which suggests covert prestige. Semantically negative adjectives, commonly used in colloquial texts, also favor the non-standard variant. Interestingly, stative/resultative constructions of the form estar + participle with an experiencer argument promote the use of -azo, suggesting that it is more specialized than -ísimo, which has a broader distribution.
Keywords: e-networks, intensifier, Peru, style, variation
References (26)
Bello, A. (1981 [1847]). Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los Americanos. Edición Crítica de Ramón Trujillo. Tenerife: Instituto Universitario de Lingüística Andrés Bello/Cabildo Insular de Tenerife.
Brown, L.A., & Tagliamonte, S. (2012). A really interesting story: The influence of narrative in linguistic change. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 18, Selected Papers from NWAV 49, 2, 1–10.
Cerrón-Palomino, Á. (2003). Sobre los grados del adjetivo calificativo español. Lexis, 27(2), 261–282.
Falcinelli, A. (2007). Valores y funciones del sufijo -azo en el español actual y sus equivalencias en italiano. Rivista di Lingue e culture moderne, 1, 23–54.
García Zapata, C. (1999). Aspectos pragmáticos de la exageración en el habla coloquial antioqueña. Colombia Lingüística y Literatura, 1(1), 9–20.
Ito, R., & Tagliamonte, S. (2003). Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society, 32(2), 257–279.
Martinell, E. (1989). Estilística de la gradación en los adjetivos. Actas del X Congreso de la Asociación Internacional de Hispanistas, 4, 1253–1262. Universidad de Barcelona.
Montoro del Arco, E.T., & Almela Pérez, R. 2008. Grados de comparación: Errores tradicionales y nuevo marco teórico. Estudios Románicos, 16/17, 727–736.
Peñalillo, M.I. (2012). Estudio sociolingüístico sobre el uso del superlativo en la región de Valparaíso, Chile. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Universidad de Valladolid.
Porto Dapena, J-Á. (1973). A propósito de los grados del adjetivo: Aportación al estudio del sistema de cuantificación en el adjetivo español. Thesaurus, 28, 344–357.
. (1985). La cuantificación del adjetivo en español actual desde el punto de vista de la expresión. In A. Blecua, J.M. Blecua, & F. Rico (Eds.), Philologica Hispaniensia in Honorem M. Alvar 2, (pp. 541–555). Madrid: Gredos.
Real Academia Española. (2010). Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Buenos Aires: Editorial Planeta.
Roca Pons, J. (1958). Estudios sobre perífrasis verbales del español. Revista de Filología Española, 67, 1–403.
Sánchez, C., Marín, R., & Evert, S. (2012). Measuring lexical extension: The case of Spanish estar + past participle. Poster presented at
Linguistic Evidence 2012. Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives
, Tübingen, February 9–11.
Tagliamonte, S. (2008). So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Toronto, Canada. English Language and Linguistics, 12, 361–394.
. (2011). Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Trudgill, P. (1972). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in urban British English. Language in Society, 1, 179–195.
Varela, S. (1989). Verbal and adjectival participles in Spanish. In C. Laeufer & T.A. Morgan (Eds.), Theoretical analyses in Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XIX, (pp. 219–234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
