Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (22)
References
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2009). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1. 05)[Computer program]. Retrieved May 1, 2009.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cho, T., & Ladefoged, P. (1999). Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics, 27(2), 207–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dmitrieva, O., Llanos, F., Shultz, A., & Francis, A. (2015). Phonological status, not voice onset time, determines the acoustic realization of onset f0 as a secondary voicing cue in Spanish and English. Journal of Phonetics, 49, 77–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
House, A.S., & Fairbanks, G. (1953). The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holt, L.L., Lotto, A., & Diehl, R. (2004). Auditory discontinuities interact with categorization: Implications for speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 1763–1773. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hombert, J.M. (1978). Consonant types, vowel quality, and tone. In V. Fromkin (Ed.), Tone: A linguistic survey (pp. 77–111). New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hosmer Jr, D.W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R.X. (2013). Applied logistic regression. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.com. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Idemaru, K., & Holt, L.L. (2011). Word recognition reflects dimension-based statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(6), 1939. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keating, P. (1984). Phonetic and phonological representations of stop consonant voicing. Language, 60, 286–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kingston, J., Diehl, R.L., Kirk, C.J., & Castleman, W.A. (2008). On the internal perceptual structure of distinctive features: The [voice] contrast. Journal of phonetics, 36(1), 28–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kingston, J., & Diehl, R.L. (1994). Phonetic knowledge. Language, 70, 419–454. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klatt, D.H. (1980). Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67(3), 971–995. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lisker, L. (1978). In qualified defense of VOT. Language and speech, 21(4), 375–383.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A.S. (1964). A crosslinguistic study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20, 384–422.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Llanos, F., Dmitrieva, O., Shultz, A., & Francis, A.L. (2013). Auditory enhancement and second language experience in Spanish and English weighting of secondary voicing cues. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(3), 2213–2224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Löfqvist, A., Baer, T., McGarr, N.S., & Story, S.R. (1989). The cricothyroid muscle in voicing control. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 1314–1321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McMurray, B., & Jongman, A. (2011). What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations. Psychological review, 118(2), 219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petersen, N.R. (1983). The effect of consonant type on fundamental frequency and larynx height in Danish. Annual Report of the Institute of Phonetics of the University of Copenhagen, 17, 55–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Repp, B.H. (1982). Phonetic trading relations and context effects: New experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 81–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shultz, A.A., Francis, A.L., & Llanos, F. (2012). Differential cue weighting in perception and production of consonant voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(2), EL95–EL101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toscano, J.C., & McMurray, B. (2012). Cue-integration and context effects in speech: Evidence against speaking-rate normalization. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(6), 1284–1301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whalen, D.H., Abramson, A.S., Lisker, L., & Mody, M. (1993). F0 gives voicing information even with unambiguous voice onset times. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 2152–2159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue