In:Sound, Syntax and Contact in the Languages of Asturias
Edited by Guillermo Lorenzo
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 36] 2022
► pp. 173–194
Chapter 9Intonational form and speaker belief in Mieres Asturian polar questions
Published online: 1 March 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.36.09gar
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.36.09gar
Abstract
Speakers can use distinct intonation contours in polar questions to convey information about ‘degree of commitment.’ The present study analyzes the intonational variation in Mieres Asturian polar questions and explores whether speakers encode information about their belief states intonationally. A production experiment was designed to elicit polar questions, and the results uncovered three main intonational patterns, namely H+L* L%, H* L%, and L* L%. The data show that, while H+L* L% is used as a canonical or ‘default’ PQ-marking tune and does not encode any information about speaker belief states, H* L% and L* L% are epistemically specified, expressing a positive epistemic bias towards the proposition, and a state of disbelief on the part of the speaker, respectively.
Keywords: Asturian, intonation, intonational meaning, polar questions, epistemic meaning
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1The intonation of Asturian
- 2.Methods
- 2.1Aims of this study
- 2.2Participants
- 2.3Materials
- 2.3.1Pragmatic contexts
- 2.4Procedure
- 2.5Intonational analysis
- 3.Results
- 3.1Description of the intonation contours
- 3.1.1H+L* L%
- 3.1.2H* L%
- 3.1.3L* L%
- 3.2DCT results
- 3.1Description of the intonation contours
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
References
References (45)
Alvarellos-Pedrero, M., Muñiz-Cachón, C., Díaz-Gómez, L. & González, R. (2011). La entonación en las variedades lingüísticas de Asturias: estudio contrastivo. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, 2011, 111–120.
Armstrong, M. E. (2015). Accounting for intonational form and function in Puerto Rican Spanish polar questions. Probus, 29(1), 1–40.
Armstrong, M. E. & Prieto, P. (2015). The contribution of context and contour to perceived belief in polar questions. Journal of Pragmatics, 81, 77–92.
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. & Kasper, G. (1989). Investigating cross-cultural pragmatics: An introductory overview. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, 31, 1–34.
Cuevas-Alonso, M. & López-Bobo, M. J. (2011). Dialectos en contacto y prosodia. Análisis contrastivo de la entonación del oriente y occidente de Cantabria. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, 2011, 39–51.
Díaz-Gómez, L., Muñiz-Cachón, C., López-Bobo, M. J., Rodríguez, R. & Cuevas-Alonso, M. (2006). La entonación en dos zonas rurales del centro de Asturias. Archivum: Revista de la Facultad de Filología, 56, 263–289.
Dryer, M. S. (2008). Position of polar question particles. In M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gill & B. Comrie. (eds.). The world atlas of language structures (pp. 374–378). Oxford University Press.
Enfield, N. J., Brown, P. & de Ruiter, J. P. (2012). Epistemic dimensions of polar questions: Sentence-final particles in comparative perspective. In J. P. de Ruiter. (ed.). Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives (pp. 193–221). Cambridge University Press.
(1998). Intonation and procedural encoding: The case of Spanish interrogatives. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 58, 169–204.
(2017). Intonation and evidentiality in Spanish polar interrogatives. Language and Speech, 60(2), 224–241.
Fernández-Rei, E. (2016). Dialectal, historical and sociolinguistic aspects of Galician intonation. Dialectologia: Revista Electrónica, 2016, 147–169.
Gravano, A., Benus, S., Hirschberg, J. B., German, E. S. & Ward, G. (2008). The effect of contour type and epistemic modality on the assessment of speaker certainty. Speech Prosody, 4, 401–404.
Grice, M. & Savino, M. (1997). Can pitch accent type convey information- status in yes-no questions? In A. Kai, H. Pirker & W. Finkler. (eds.). Proceedings of the ACL/EACL ’97 Workshop on Concept-to-Speech Generation Systems, 29–38.
Heritage, J. & Raymond, G. (2012). Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions. In J. P. de Ruiter. (ed.). Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives (pp. 179–192). Cambridge University Press.
Hualde, J. I. & Prieto, P. (2015). Intonational variation in Spanish: European and American varieties. In S. Frota & P. Prieto. (eds.). Intonation in Romance (pp. 350–391). Oxford University Press.
Jun, S. A. (ed.) (2005). Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
(2014). Prosodic typology: By prominence type, word prosody, and macro-rhythm. Prosodic typology II: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford University Press.
Ladd, D. R. (1981). A first look at the semantics and pragmatics of negative questions and tag questions. Papers from the Regional Meeting. Chicago Linguistic Society, 17, 164–171.
López-Bobo, M. J., Cuevas-Alonso, M., Díaz-Gómez, L. & Viejo Lucio-Villegas, M. (2008). Análisis contrastivo de la prosodia del asturiano central y occidental. Language Design: Journal of Theoretical and Experimental Linguistics (Special Issue), 267–282.
Lusini, S. (2013). Yes-no question/marking in Italian dialects: A typological, theoretical and experimental approach. Leiden University.
(2008). Yes-no question/marking in Italian dialects: A typological, theoretical and experimental approach. Leiden University.
Martínez-Celdrán, E. & Fernández-Planas, A. N. (eds.) (2003–2018). Atlas multimèdia de la prosòdia de l’espai romànic. [URL]
Muñiz-Cachón, C., Díaz-Gómez, L., Alvarellos-Pedrero, M. & González-Rodríguez, R. (2010). La prosodia d’Asturies. Homenaxe al profesor Xosé Lluis García Arias. Lletres Asturianes (anexu 1), 279–315.
Muñiz-Cachón, C. (2013). La entonación asturiana nel marcu de les llingües romániques: los atles prosódicos. Lletres Asturianes, 109, 11–28.
(2017). Implicaciones de la duración en la prosodia: asturiano y castellano del centro de Asturias. Estudios de fonética experimental, 2017, 223–243.
Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Pierrehumbert, J. & Hirschberg, J. (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan & M. E. Pollack. (eds.). Intentions in communication (pp. 271–311). MIT Press.
Prieto, P. & Rigau, G. (2007). The syntax-prosody interface: Catalan interrogative sentences headed by que. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 6(2), 29–59,
Prieto, Pilar & Roseano, P. (2010). Transcription of intonation of the Spanish language. Lincom Europa.
Prieto, P. (2015). Intonational meaning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6(4), 371–381.
Savino, M. & Grice, M. (2011). The perception of negative bias in Bari Italian questions. In S. Frota, G. Elordieta & P. Prieto. (eds.). Prosodic categories: Production, perception and comprehension (pp. 187–206). Springer.
Sudo, Y. (2013). Biased polar questions in English and Japanese. In D. Gutzmann & H. N. Gärtner. (eds.). Beyond expressives: Explorations in use-conditional meaning (pp. 275–295). Brill.
Vanrell, M. M. (2011). The phonological relevance of tonal scaling in the intonational grammar of Catalan. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Vanrell, M. M. & Fernández-Soriano, O. (2013). Variation at the interfaces in Ibero-Romance. Catalan and Spanish prosody and word order. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 12, 253–282.
Vanrell, M. M., Mascaró, I., Torres-Tamarit, F. & Prieto, P. (2013). Intonation as an encoder of speaker certainty: Information and confirmation yes-no questions in Catalan. Language and Speech, 56(2), 163–190.
Vanrell, M. M., Armstrong, M. E. & Prieto, P. (2014). The role of prosody in the encoding of evidentiality. Proceedings of Speech Prosody, Dublin, Ireland, Vol. 7, 1222–1226.