References (33)
References
Anagnostopoulou, E. (2003). The syntax of ditransitives: Evidence from clitics. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Béjar, S. & Rezac, M. (2009). Cyclic agree. Linguistic Inquiry, 40, 35–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonet, M. E. (1991). Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Branchadell, A. (1992). A study of lexical and non-lexical datives. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Chomsky, N. (2004). Beyond explanatory adequacy. In A. Belleti. (ed.). Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures 3 (pp. 104–131). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cysouw, M. (2013). Inclusive/exclusive distinction in independent pronouns. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath. (eds.). The world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
Embick, D. & Noyer, R. (2007). Distributed Morphology and the syntax-morphology interface. In G. Ramchand & C. Reiss. (eds.). The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces (pp. 289–324). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández, B. & Rezac, M. (2016). Differential object marking in Basque dialects. In B. Fernández & J. Ortiz de Urbina. (eds.). Microparameters in the grammar of Basque (pp. 93–138). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser. (eds.). The view from Building 20 (pp. 111–176). MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaeggli, O. (1982). Topics in Romance syntax. Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakubowicz, C., Nash, L., Rigaut, C. & Gerard, Ch. -L. (1998). Determiners and clitic pronouns in French-speaking children with SLI. Language Acquisition, 7, 113–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S. (1975). French syntax: The transformational cycle. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). Null subjects and clitic climbing. In O. Jaeggli & K. Safir. (eds.). The Null Subject Parameter (pp. 239–261). Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larson, R. K. (1988). On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 335–391.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leclère, Ch. (1976). Datifs syntaxiques et datifs éthiques. In J. -C. Chevalier & M. Gross. (eds.). Méthodes en grammaire française (pp. 73–96). Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longa, V. M. & Lorenzo, G. (2001). Universal constraints on ‘superfluous’ elements: The case of Galician ‘Arb Che’. In J. Gutiérrez-Resach & J. Silva-Villar. (eds.). Current Issues in Spanish Syntax and Semantics 53 (pp. 175–192). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longa, V. M., Lorenzo, G. & Rigau, G. (1996). Expressing modality by recycling clitics. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics, 5, 69–79.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenzo, G. (this issue). Are Asturian clitics distinctly distinct?
Martins, A. M. & Nunes, J. (2017). Identity avoidance with reflexive clitics in European Portuguese and Minimalist approaches to control. Linguistic Inquiry, 48, 627–649. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (1986). OCP effects: Gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 217–263.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Odria, A. (2017). Differential object marking and datives in Basque syntax. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of the Basque Country.
Ormazabal, J. & Romero, J. (2007). The Object Agreement Constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, 315–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Object clitics, agreement and dialectal variation. Probus, 25, 301–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ormazabal, J., & Romero, J. (2015). Argumentos añadidos y restricciones de concordancia. In A. Gallego. (ed.). Perspectivas de sintaxis formal (pp. 223–252). Akal.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. M. (1971). Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richards, N. (2010). Uttering trees. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon, H. J. (2005). Only you? Philological investigations into the alleged inclusive-exclusive distinction in the second-person plural. In E. Filimonova, Elena. (ed.). Clusivity: Typological and case studies of the inclusive-exclusive distinction (pp. 113–140). John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sportiche, D. (1996). Clitic constructions. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring. (eds.). Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp. 213–276). Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strotzer, J. (1978). On the so-called ‘dative of interest’. Hispania, 61, 117–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torrego, E. (1998). The dependencies of the objects. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uriagereka, J. (1995). Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry, 26, 79–123.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. M. (1977). On clitics. Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue