In:Linguistic Landscape in the Spanish-speaking World
Edited by Patricia Gubitosi and Michelle F. Ramos Pellicia
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 35] 2021
► pp. 135–158
Chapter 5Urban discourse and civil resistance against gender-based
violence in Madrid
Published online: 29 July 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.35.05mar
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.35.05mar
Abstract
Linguistic Landscape is analyzed to determine how
women’s voices come together in the urban space to ultimately become
a political movement. In recent years, women in Spain have been at
the front and center of an unprecedented mobilization against gender
inequality in all of its forms: salary gap, discrimination and
sexual violence, putting them at the leading edge of feminism
worldwide. I show how this political movement develops in Madrid. My
study is based on geosemiotics (Scollon & Scollon, 2003) and a qualitative
methodology is applied to understand how the social and political
action of protest is approached as mediated through texts and
signs.
Keywords: urban discourse, civil resistance, gender-based violence
Article outline
- Introduction
- Theoretical framework
- Methodology
- Analysis
- The mobilization of women in Madrid: Antecedents and social context
- A further detonator: The Manada case
- Discourses of gender solidarity in place
- Identity and resistance in the LL: Multimodal profiles of the participants in the protests
- The superdiversity, dynamism and historicity of the protest movement in the urban space
- Conclusions
Notes References
References (25)
Barni, M., & Bagna, C. (2015). The critical turn in LL. New methodologies and
new items in LL. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1–2), 6–18.
(2016). 1 March – ‘A day without inmigrants’: The urban
linguistic landscape and the immigrants’
protest. In R. Blackwood, E. Lanza, & H. Woldemariam (Eds.), Negotiating and contesting identities in linguistic
landscapes (pp. 55–70). Bloomsbury.
Ben Said, S., & Kasanga, L. A. (2016). The discourse of protest: Frames of identity,
intertextuality and interdiscursivity. In R. Blackwood, E. Lanza, & H. Woldemariam (Eds.), Negotiating and contesting identities in linguistic
landscapes (pp. 71–84). Bloomsbury.
Blackwood, R., Lanza, E., & Woldemariam, H. (Eds.) (2016). Negotiating and contesting identities in linguistic
landscapes. Bloomsbury.
Blommaert, J., & Maly, I. (2015). Ethnographic linguistic landscape analysis and
social change. In J. Blommaert, B. Rampton, K. Arnaut, & M. Spotti (Eds.), Language & superdiversity (pp. 191–211). Routledge.
Dwyer, S., & Buckle, J. L. (2009). The space between: On being an insider-outsider
in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54–63.
Gorter, D. (Ed.) (2006). Linguistic landscape: A new approach to
multilingualism. Multilingual Matters.
Hägerstrand, T. (1967). Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. Chicago University Press. (Original work published 1953)
Hanauer, D. I. (2015). Occupy Baltimore: A linguistic landscape analysis
of participatory social contestation in an American
city. In R. Rubdy & S. Ben Said (Eds.), Conflict, exclusion and dissent in the linguistic
landscape (pp. 207–222). Palgrave Macmillan.
Irvine, J., & Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic
differentiation. In P. V. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, politics and
identities (pp. 35–83). SAR Press.
Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic
vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49.
Maehlum, B. (2010). Language and social spaces. In P. Auer & J. E. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and space. An international handbook of
linguistic variation, Vol. 1: Theories and methods (pp. 18–32). The Gruyter Mouton.
Martín Rojo, L. (2012). Paisajes lingüísticos de indignación. Prácticas
comunicativas para tomar las plazas. Anuari del Conflicte Social, 2, 275–302.
(2014). Taking over the square. The role of linguistic
practices in contesting urban spaces. Journal of Language and Politics, 13(4), 623–652.
(2016a). Language and power. In O. García, N. Flores, & M. Spotti (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and society (pp. 77–102). Oxford University Press.
(Ed.) (2016b). Occupy. The spatial dynamics of discourse in global
protest movements. John Benjamins.
Peirce, C. S. (1955). Logic as semiotics: The theory of
signs. In J. Buchler (Ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce (pp. 98–119). Dover Publications.
Rubdy, R. (2015). Conflict and exclusion: the linguistic landscape
as an arena of contestation. In R. Rubdy & S. Ben Said (Eds.), Conflict, exclusion and dissent in the linguistic
landscape (pp. 1–24). Palgrave Macmillan.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material
world. Routledge.
Seals, C. A. (2015). Overcoming erasure: Reappropriation of space in
the LL of mass-scale protest. In R. Rubdy & S. Ben Said (Eds.), Conflict, exclusion and dissent in the linguistic
landscape (pp. 223–238). Palgrave Macmillan.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Arias Álvarez, Alba
Arias Álvarez, Alba
Hosokawa, Naoko
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
