In:Linguistic Landscape in the Spanish-speaking World
Edited by Patricia Gubitosi and Michelle F. Ramos Pellicia
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 35] 2021
► pp. 19–44
Chapter 1Language use and identity negotiation in the linguistic landscape
of Chipilo, Mexico
Published online: 29 July 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.35.01sbr
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.35.01sbr
Abstract
This is the first study exploring the
characteristics of the Linguistic Landscape of Chipilo, a town of an
immigrant community of Italian origin in Mexico, which has
maintained its language and ethnic identity over six generations.
The linguistic landscape (hereafter: LL) marks the geographical
space inhabited by Chipileños and reflects the relation among the
languages used (Spanish, Veneto, Italian and English). Its
distinctive trait is the combination of textual items with the
typical sounds, smells and tastes that can be perceived in the
streets of the town. The multisensory LL creates a unique ambience
and contributes to the symbolic construction of a distinct public
space and the promotion of the collective ethnic identity within the
community in relation to other groups.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Theoretical framework
- Chipilo, a brief sociolinguistic background
- Methodology
- Results
- Official signs
- Nonofficial signs
- Nonofficial signs in Veneto and Spanish
- Italian in the linguistic landscape of Chipilo
- Nonofficial signs in Italian and Spanish
- English in the linguistic landscape of Chipilo
- The interanimation of various -scapes in Chipilo
- Conclusions
References
References (25)
Backhaus, P. (2006). Multilingualism in Tokyo: A look into the
linguistic landscape. In D. Gorter (Ed.), Linguistic landscape. A new approach to
multilingualism (pp. 52–66). Multilingual Matters.
Bamberg, M. G. W., De Fina, A., & Schiffrin, D. (2007). Selves and identities in narrative and
discourse. John Benjamins.
Barni, M., & Bagna, C. (2015). The critical turn in LL. New methodologies and
new items in LL. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1/2), 6–18.
Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Amara, M. H., & Trumper-Hecht, N. (2006). Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of
the public space: The case of Israel. In D. Gorter (Ed.), Linguistic landscape: A new approach to
multilingualism (pp. 7–31). Multilingual Matters.
Blommaert, J. (2013). Semiotic and spatial scope towards a materialist
semiotics. In N. Pachler, & M. Böck (Eds.), Multimodality and social semiosis. Communication,
meaning-making, and learning in the work of Gunther
Kress (pp. 29–38). Routledge.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: a sociocultural
linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614.
Calvi, M. V. (2018). Español e italiano en el paisaje lingüístico de
Milán: ¿Traducción, mediación o
translanguaging? Lingue e Linguaggi, 25, 145–172.
Calvi, M. V., & Uberti-Bona, M. (2020). Negotiating languages, identities and space in
Hispanic linguistic landscape in Milan. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development RMMM, 41(1), 25–44.
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2006). Linguistic landscape and minority
languages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 67–80.
De Fina, A. (2003). Identity in narrative. A study of immigrant
discourse. John Benjamins.
De Fina, A., Schiffrin, D., & Bamberg, M. G. W. (Eds.). (2006). Discourse and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in
natural languages. Cambridge University Press.
García Negroni, M. M., & Tordesillas Colado, M. (2001). La enunciación en la lengua. De la deixis a la
polifonía. Editorial Gredos.
Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic
vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16, 23–49.
Kaplan-Weinger, J., & Ullman, C. (2015). Methods for the ethnography of communication. Language
in use in schools and communities. Routledge.
Pennycook, A., & Otsuji, E. (2015). Making scents of the landscape. Linguistic Landscape, 1(3), 191–212.
Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1990). Language and social
identification. In D. Abrams, & M. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical
advances (pp. 211–229). Harvester-Wheatsheat.
Sbrighi, L. (2018). El aumento de las uniones mixtas en Chipilo,
México: Actitudes y percepción identitaria en una comunidad
inmigrante de origen italiano. Cuadernos Aispi, 12, 191–214.
(2019). Construcción discursiva de la identidad propia y
de la nueva percepción del otro en Chipilo,
México (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Mexico.
Sbrighi, L., Greathouse Amador, L. M., & Preciado Lloyd, P. N. (2020). The new perception of the other in Chipilo,
Mexico. Lengua y migración / Language and Migration, 12(1), 7–35.
Scarvaglieri, C., Redder, A., Pappenhagen, R., & Brehmer, B. (2013). Capturing diversity: Linguistic land and
soundscaping. In J. Duarte & I. Gogolin (Eds.), Linguistic superdiversity in urban areas: Research
approaches (pp. 45–74). John Benjamins.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Bhujel, Birendra & Sweta Sinha
Harjus, Jannis
Crivelli Minutti, Eduardo
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
