Cover not available

In:Syntactic Geolectal Variation: Traditional approaches, current challenges and new tools
Edited by Alba Cerrudo, Ángel J. Gallego and Francesc Roca Urgell
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 34] 2021
► pp. 263–294

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 9
On the role of prosody in wh-in-situ

Cross-linguistic comparison and experimental evidence from Basque

 | CNRS-IKER
 | CNRS-IKER
Published online: 26 November 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.34.09dug
Abstract
A growing number of works propose a direct role of PF in the generation of wh-in-situ. Relying mainly on data from Basque, we critically evaluate two such proposals (Richards, 2010; Mathieu, 2016) and argue that they face a range of empirical and conceptual shortcomings. We contrast these with the more “syntactocentric” proposal of Cheng & Rooryck (2000) for French, based on an intonational Q-morpheme that surfaces as a final rise in polar and wh-in-situ questions. We report the outcome of a production experiment providing evidence that the final rises of polar and wh-in-situ questions in Navarro-Labourdin Basque do not differ substantially, thus suggesting that Cheng & Rooryck’s (2000) proposal may be extended to this variety cohabiting with French.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Basque interrogative strategies: The emergence of wh-in-situ
    • 2.1Interrogatives in Basque
    • 2.2The new wh-in-situ strategy of Navarro-Labourdin Basque
  • 3.Interface approaches to wh-in-situ
    • 3.1 Cheng & Rooryck (2000) : An intonation morpheme licensing wh-in-situ and yes/no questions
    • 3.2Richards (2010, 2016)
    • 3.3 Mathieu (2016)
  • 4.Problems with prosody-based analyses
    • 4.1Stress patterns and interrogative strategies
    • 4.2Prosodic phrasing and interrogative strategies
  • 5.Assessing the prosodic patterns of interrogatives in Basque: An experiment
    • 5.1Extending Cheng & Rooryck’s (2000) analysis to Basque
    • 5.2The experiment
      • 5.2.1The questionnaire
      • 5.2.2Measurements
      • 5.2.3Results
    • 5.3Discussion
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (81)
References
Altube, S. (1920). De sintaxis euskérika. Donostia: Martin Mena y Cía.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arregi, K. (2002). Focus on Basque movements (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Artiagoitia, X. (2000). Hatsarreak eta Parametroak Lantzen. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Arabako Foru Aldundia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aurrekoetxea, G., Gaminde, I., & Iglesias, A. (2011). Corpus based prosodic variation in Basque: Y/N questions marked with the particle al . Estudios de Fonética Experimental, XX, 11–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beckman, M. E., & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 255–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Y., & Gussenhoven, C. (2008). Emphasis and tonal implementation in Standard Chinese. Journal of Phonetics, 36, 724–746. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, L. L-S. (1991). On the typology of wh-questions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, L. L-S., & Downing, L. J. (2011). Mapping phonology to syntax: Evidence from two wh-in-situ languages. Paper presented at GLOW 34, University of Vienna.
Cheng, L. L.-S., & Rooryck, J. (2000). Licensing wh-in-situ. Syntax, 3(1), 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cole, P., & Hermon, G. (1994). Is there LF wh-movement? Linguistic Inquiry, 25(2), 239–262.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahan, D., & Bernard, J-M. (1996). Interspeaker variability in emphatic accent production in French. Language & Speech, 39(4), 341–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
David, A. B. (2014). A descriptive grammar of Pashto and its dialects. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dayal, V. (1996). Locality in wh-quantification: Questions and relative clauses in Hindi. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delais-Roussarie, E., Post, B., Avanzi, M., Buthke, C., Di Cristo, A., Feldhausen, I., et al. (2015). Intonational phonology of French: Developing a ToBI system for French. In S. Frota & P. Prieto (Eds.), Intonation in Romance (pp. 63–100). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Déprez, V., Syrett, K., & Kawahara, S. (2013). The interaction of syntax, prosody, and discourse in licensing French wh-in-situ questions. Lingua, 124, 4–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dhongde, R. V., & Wali, K. (2009). Marathi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dohen, M., & Lœvenbruck, H. (2004). Pre-focal rephrasing, focal enhancement and postfocal deaccentuation in French. INTERSPEECH 2004: 8th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 785–788).
Duguine, M., & Irurtzun, A. (2014). From obligatory wh-movement to optional wh-in-situ in Labourdin Basque. Language, 90(1), e1–e30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eguzkitza, A. (1987). Topics on the syntax of Basque and Romance (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). UCLA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eilam, A. (2008). Intervention effects: Why Amharic patterns differently. In N. Abner & J. Bishop (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 141–149). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elordieta, A. (2001). Verb movement and constituent permutation in Basque. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elordieta, G. (1997). Accent, tone, and intonation in Lekeitio Basque. In F. Martínez-Gil & A. Morales-Front (Eds.), Issues in the phonology and morphology of the major Iberian languages (pp. 3–78). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Intonation in a pitch accent variety of Basque. ASJU: International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology, XXXII(2), 511–569.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Intonation. In J. I. Hualde & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), A grammar of Basque (pp. 72–112). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007a). Constraints on intonational prominence of focalized constituents. In C. Lee, M. Gordon, & D. Büring (Eds.), Topic and focus: Cross-linguistic perspectives on meaning and intonation (pp. 1–22). Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007b). A constraint-based analysis of the intonational realization of focus in Northern Bizkaian Basque. In T. Riad & C. Gussenhoven (Eds.), Tones and tunes, Vol. I: Typological studies in word and sentence prosody (pp. 199–232). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elordieta, G., & J. I. Hualde. (2015). Intonation in Basque. In S. A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic typology, II: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 405–463). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erdocia, K., Laka, I., Mestres-Missé, A., & Rodriguez-Fornells, A. (2009). Syntactic complexity and ambiguity resolution in a free word order language: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidences from Basque. Brain and Language, 109, 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Etxepare, R., & Ortiz de Urbina, J. (2003). Focalization. In J. I. Hualde & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), A grammar of Basque (pp. 465–522). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fujisaki, H., & Kawai, H. (1988). Realization of linguistic information in the voice fundamental frequency contour of the spoken Japanese. Acoustics, Speech Signal and Processing, 88, 663–666. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaminde, I. (2000). Muskildiko galderen intonazioaz. Uztaro, 35, 71–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaminde, I., & Salaberria, J. (1997). Ezpeleta, Lekorne eta Makeako azentu-ereduez. Uztaro, 20, 93–103.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gryllia, S., Cheng, L. L-S., & Doetjes, J. (2016). On the intonation of French wh-in-situ questions: What happens before the wh-word is reached? Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2016, 611–614. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gu, Z., Mori, H., & Kasuya, H. (2003). Analysis of vowel formant frequency variations between focus and neutral speech in Mandarin Chinese. Acoustical Science and Technology, 24(4), 192–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haile, A. (1987). Lexical Stress in Amharic. Journal of Ethiopian Studies, 20, 19–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hintz, D. M. (2006). Stress in South Conchucos Quechua: A phonetic and phonological study. International Journal of American Linguistics, 72(4), 477–521. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hualde, J. I. (1999). Basque accentuation. In H. van der Hulst (Ed.), Word prosodic systems in the languages of Europe (pp. 947–993). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Accentuation. In J. I. Hualde & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), A grammar of Basque (pp. 65–72). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hualde, J. I., Elordieta, G., & Elordieta, A. (1994). The Basque dialect of Lekeitio. Donostia: Gipuzkoako Foru Aldundia & UPV/EHU.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hualde, J. I., Elordieta, G., Gaminde, I., & Smiljanić, R. (2002). From pitch-accent to stress-accent in Basque. In C. Gussenhoven & N. Warner (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology 7, 547–584. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hwang, H. K. (2006). Intonation patterns of wh-interrogatives in South Kyungsang Korean and Fukuoka Japanese. Eoneohak, 45, 39–59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Distinct types of focus and wh-question intonation. In W. S. Lee & E. Zee (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII) (pp. 922–925). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. (2009). How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences, 31, 213–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Irurtzun, A. (2007). The grammar of focus at the interfaces (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Vitoria-Gasteiz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). A derivational approach to the focus-structure. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 53(2/3), 327–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Strategies for argument and adjunct focalization in Basque. In B. Fernández & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.), Microparameters in the grammar of Basque (pp. 243–263). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ishihara, S. (2011). Japanese focus prosody revisited: Freeing focus from prosodic phrasing. Lingua, 121(13), 1870–1889. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Syntax-phonology interface. In H. Kubozono (Ed.), Handbook of Japanese phonetics and phonology (pp. 569–618). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ito, K. (2002). The interaction of focus and lexical pitch accent in speech production and dialogue comprehension: Evidence from Japanese and Basque (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jun, S. A., & Fougeron, C. (2000). A phonological model of French intonation. In A. Botinis (Ed.), Intonation: Analysis, modelling and technology (pp. 209–242). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, J., & Jun, S. A. (2009). Prosodic structure and focus prosody of South Kyungsang Korean. Language Research, 45(1), 43–66.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kruschke, J. K. (2013). Bayesian estimation supersedes the t test. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 142, 573–603. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan (2nd ed.). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kubozono, H. (1987). The organization of Japanese prosody (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Focus and intonation in Japanese: Does focus trigger pitch reset? In S. Ishihara (Ed.), Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure, 9, 1–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Hye-Sook. (2007). Interrogative intonation in North Kyungsang Korean: Language-specificity and universality of acoustic and perceptual cues. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory, 16, 57–100.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Y-C., Wang, T., & Liberman, M. (2016). Production and perception of Tone 3 focus in Mandarin Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology, 7:1058. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, F., & Xu, Y. (2005). Parallel encoding of focus and interrogative meaning in Mandarin intonation. Phonetica, 62, 70–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maekawa, K. (1999). Effects of focus on duration and vowel formant frequency in Japanese. In Y. Sagisaka, N. Campbell, & N. Higuchi (Eds.), Computing prosody: Computational models for processing spontaneous speech (pp. 129–145). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mathieu, E. (2016). The wh-parameter and radical externatization. In L. Eguren, O. Fernández-Soriano, & A. Mendikoetxea (Eds.), Rethinking parameters (pp. 252–290). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ménard, L., Lœvenbruck, H., & Savariaux, C. (2006). Articulatory and acoustic correlates of contrastive focus in French: A developmental study. In J. Harrington & M. Tabain (Eds), Speech production: Models, phonetic processes and techniques (pp. 227–251). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortiz de Urbina, J. (1989). Some parameters in the grammar of Basque. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Force phrases, focus phrases and left heads in Basque. In J. A. Franco, A. Landa & J. Martín (Eds), Grammatical analyses in Basque and Romance linguistics: Papers in honor of Mario Saltarelli (pp. 179–194). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patil, U., Kentner, G., Gollrad, A., Kügler, F., Féry, C., & Vasishth, S. (2008). Focus, word order and intonation in Hindi. Journal of South Asian Linguistics, 1(1), 55–72.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perrone-Bertolotti, M. D., Lœvenbruck, H., Sato, M., Pichat, C., & Baciu, M. (2013). Neural correlates of the perception of contrastive prosodic focus in French: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Human Brain Mapping, 34, 2574–2592. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. B., & Beckman, M. E. (1988). Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rebuschi, G. (1997). A note on focalization in Basque. In Essais de linguistique basque. Supplements of ASJU XXXV, 31–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richards, N. (2016). Contiguity theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Uttering trees. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rietveld, T. C. M., & Gussenhoven, C. (1985). On the relation between pitch excursion size and prominence. Journal of Phonetics, 13, 299–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Rijk, R. P. G. (1969). Is Basque an SOV language? Fontes Linguae Vasconum 1: 319–351.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1978). Topic fronting, focus positioning, and the nature of the verb phrase in Basque. In F. Jansen (Ed.), Studies on fronting (pp. 81–112). Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tegey, H., & Robson, B. (1996). A reference grammar of Pashto. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
t’Hart, J. (1981). Differential sensitivity to pitch distance, particularly in speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69.3, 811–821. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Venditti, J. J., Maekawa, K., & Beckman, M. E. (2008). Prominence marking in the Japanese intonation system. In S. Miyagawa & M. Saito (Eds.), Handbook of Japanese linguistics (pp. 456–512). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wali, K. (2005). Marathi. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, Yi. (1999). Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of f0 contours. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 55–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yokoyama, S. (1979). Jisho midashigo no akusento no seikaku ni tsuite [On the nature of the accent of dictionary-listed words]. Conference handbook, The Acoustical Society of Japan.
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue