In:East and West of The Pentacrest: Linguistic studies in honor of Paula Kempchinsky
Edited by Timothy Gupton and Elizabeth Gielau
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 33] 2021
► pp. 135–156
Get fulltext
Chapter 7Spanish impersonal se in control infinitivals
and the ungrammaticality of se se sequences
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 10 May 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.33.7mac
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.33.7mac
Abstract
In this paper, we offer an analysis of impersonal
se (Impse) constructions in control
infinitivals. We claim that se itself spells out
the valued version of the [uD] feature that Holmberg (2010) and Roberts (2010) propose is a property of T
in consistent null subject languages. As a corollary, we link
Impse constructions to the consistent null subject
status of a language (in the spirit of Belletti, 1982). Moreover, we claim that in
Impse constructions there is a projected null
external argument (pro
se) interpreted as non-referential because of the valued
version of Holmberg’s [uD] feature in T that se
spells out. We also argue that ungrammatical sequences of
Impse and other se result from the
featural deficiency of pro
se; specifically, it lacks a specification for
number.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Assumptions regarding Impse
- 2.1Impse spells out T[D]
- 2.2Projected pro se
- 3.
The non-referentiality of pro
se
- 3.1 Pro se does not introduce a discourse referent
- 4.Impse in infinitives
- 5.The features of se
- 5.1The phi-features of pro se
- 6.Conclusion
Acknowledgments Notes References
References (46)
Alexiadou, A., & Anagnostopoulou, E. (1998). Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and
EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 491–539.
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E., & Schäfer, F. (2006). The properties of anticausatives
crosslinguistically. In M. Frascarelli (Ed.), Phases of interpretation. Mouton de Gruyter.
Armstrong, G. (2011). Two classes of transitiv verbs: Evidence from
Spanish (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University.
Belletti, A. (1982). Morphological passive and pro-drop: The
impersonal construction in Italian. Journal of Linguistic Research, 2(4), 1–34.
Chomsky, N. (1982). Some concepts and consequences of the theory of
government and binding. The MIT Press.
De Miguel Aparicio, E. (1992). El aspecto en la sintaxis del español: Perfectividad e
impersonalidad. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Dobrovie-Sorin, C. (1998). Impersonal se constructions in Romance and the
passivization of unergatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 29(3), 399–437.
Folli, R., & Harley, H. (2005). Consuming results in Italian and English: Flavors
of v. In P. Kempchinsky & R. Slabakova (Eds.), Syntax, semantics, and acquisition of aspect (pp. 95–120). Springer.
Frascarelli, M. (2007). Subjects, topics and the interpretation of
referential pro. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25(4), 691–734.
Gallego, A. (2016). Three types of prepositions in Spanish SE
sentences. Consequences for cross-dialectal
studies. Dialectología, 17, 51–70.
Harley, H. (2013). External arguments and the mirror principle: On
the distinctness of voice and v. Lingua, 125, 34–57.
Holmberg, A. (2005). Is there a little pro? Evidence from
Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(4), 533–564.
(2010). Null subject parameters. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist
theory (pp. 88–124). Cambridge University Press.
Kempchinsky, P. (2004). Romance SE as an aspectual
element. In J. Auger, J. C. Clements, & B. Vance (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to Romance linguistics (pp. 239–256). John Benjamins.
Landau, I. (1999). Control and extraposition: The case of
super-equi. In. P. Tamanji, M. Hirotani, & N. Hall (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th conference of the North Eastern
Linguistic Society (pp. 213–228). GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
MacDonald, J. E. (2017). An implicit projected argument in Spanish
impersonal and passive-se constructions. Syntax, 20(4), 353–383.
MacDonald, J. E., Carvalho, J., & Maddox, M. (2016). An argument from Brazilian Portuguese for a
syntactically projected implicit argument. In C. Hammerly & B. Prickett (Eds.), Proceedings of 46th annual meeting of the North Eastern
Linguistics Society (pp. 307–316). GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
MacDonald, J. E., & Maddox, M. (2018). Passive se in Romanian and Spanish: A subject
cycle. Journal of Linguistics, 54(2), 389–427.
MacDonald, J. E., & Melgares, J. (n.d.). On (un)grammatical clitic sequences in impersonal
se constructions (Unpublished manuscript).
MacDonald, J. E., & Vázquez-Lozares, A. (n.d). On (un)grammatical sequences of
se in Spanish. (Unpublished manuscript).
Maddox, M. (n.d.). Licensing conditions on null generic subjects in
Spanish. (Unpublished manuscript).
Martins, A. M., & Nunes, J. (2016). Passives and se
constructions. In W. L. Wetzels, J. Costa, & S. Menuzzi (Eds.), The handbook of Portuguese linguistics (pp. 318–337). Wiley-Blackwell.
(2017). Identity avoidance with reflexive clitics in
European Portuguese and the theory of
control. Linguistic Inquiry, 48(4), 627–649.
Mendikoetxea, A. (1992). On the nature of agreement: The syntax of Arb se
in Spanish (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of York.
(2008). Clitic impersonal constructions in Romance:
Syntactic features and semantic
interpretation. Transactions of the Philological Society, 106(2), 290–336.
Ordóñez, F. (n.d.). On the nature of the impersonal SE: Case,
interpretation and variation. (Unpublished manuscript).
Ordóñez, F., & Treviño, E. (2016). Agreement and D.O.M. with se: A comparative study
of Mexican and Peninsular Spanish. In M. Kato, & F. Ordóñez (Eds.), The morphosyntax of Portuguese and Spanish in Latin
America (pp. 236–258). Oxford University Press.
Otero, C. P. (1985). Arbitrary subjects in finite
clauses. In I. Bordelois, H. Contreras, & K. Zagona (Eds.), Generative studies in Spanish syntax (pp. 81–110). Foris.
(2002). Facetas del se
. In C. Sánches López (Ed.), Las construcciones con se (pp. 165–206). Visor libros.
Rivero, M. L. (2002). On impersonal reflexives in Romance and Slavic
and semantic variation. In J. Camps & C. R. Wiltshire (Eds.), Romance syntax, semantics and L2 acquisition (pp. 169–195). John Benjamins.
Roberts, I. (2010). A deletion analysis of null
subjects. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist
theory (pp. 58–87). Cambridge University Press.
Saab, A. (2002). Asignación de caso en construcciones con
se impersonal. Actas del IX congreso de la Sociedad Argentina de
Lingüística (en CD-ROM). Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.
Schäfer, F. (2008). The syntax of (anti-)causatives. John Benjamins.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
MacDonald, Jonathan E. & Almike Vázquez-Lozares
2022. On (un)grammatical sequences of ses in Spanish. In Points of Convergence in Romance Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 360], ► pp. 127 ff.
MacDonald, Jonathan E. & Jeriel Melgares
Satterfield, Teresa
2021. Dual competence in dual language learners. In East and West of The Pentacrest [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 33], ► pp. 189 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
