Cover not available

In:East and West of The Pentacrest: Linguistic studies in honor of Paula Kempchinsky
Edited by Timothy Gupton and Elizabeth Gielau
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 33] 2021
► pp. 41–68

Get fulltext
PDF logo with download linkDownload Chapter PDF

Chapter 2
Aligning syntax and prosody in Galician

Against a prosodic isomorphism account

 | University of Georgia
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 10 May 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.33.02gup
Abstract
The current chapter contributes to recent studies on the syntax and prosody of the left periphery (LP) in Romance in general and Galician in particular. The experimental data examined establish prosodic contours for six information structure contexts in Galician using the Melodic Analysis of Speech (MAS) protocol (Cantero, 2002; Cantero & Font-Rotchés, 2009). I test the claim in e.g. Frascarelli & Hinterhölzl (2007) that left-peripheral syntactic projections each have a unique, corresponding prosodic contour, a claim based on one-to-one correspondences between pitch and information structure in Italian and German data. Findings suggest that, despite some tendencies in support of this account, certain intonation contours are used to encode more than one information structure type. The data examined militate against an isomorphic account of intonation and syntax, and instead favor a homomorphic relation between the two, thus supporting a more parsimonious view of the LP (Emonds, 2004; Kempchinsky, 2013; López, 2009).
Article outline
  • 1.Background
  • 2.Review of the literature
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusions and further directions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (35)
References
Barbosa, P. (2000). Clitics: A window into the null subject property. In J. Costa (Ed.), Portuguese syntax: New comparative studies (pp. 31–93. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bianchi, V., & Bocci, G. (2012). Should I stay or should I go? Optional focus movement in Italian. In C. Piñón (Ed.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 9 (pp. 95–112). Retrieved on 18 November 2020 from [URL]
Boeckx, C. (2009). On long-distance agree. Iberia, 1(1), 1–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.4.08. Retrieved 24 March 2015 from [URL]
Cantero, F. J. (2002). Teoría y análisis de la entonación. Barcelona: Edicións de la Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cantero, F. J., & Font-Rotchés, D. (2009). Protocolo para el análisis melódico del habla. Estudios de Fonética Experimental, 18, 17–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Castro, O. (2003). Pitch accent in Galician Spanish. In L. Sahayi (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the First Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics (pp. 43–52). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (1990). Types of Ā dependencies. The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, J. (2004). Subject positions and interfaces: The case of European Portuguese. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emonds, J. (2004). Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions. In D. Adger, C. De Cat, & G. Tsoulas (Eds.), Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects (pp. 75–120). Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escourido, A. (2005). Aproximación ao estudo da focalización no galego. In M. González González, M. Fernández Rei, & B. González Rei (Eds.), III Congreso Internacional de Fonética Experimental (pp. 261–277). Santiago de Compostela: Xunta de Galicia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Face, T., & d’Imperio, M. (2005). Reconsidering a focal typology: Evidence from Spanish and Italian. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 17, 271–289.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feldhausen, I. (2016). The relation between prosody and syntax: The case of different types of left-dislocations in Spanish. In M. Armstrong, N. Henriksen, & M. Vanrell (Eds.), Intonational grammar in Ibero-Romance. Approaches across linguistic subfields (pp. 153–180). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández Rubiera, F. (2009). Clitics at the edge: Clitic placement in Western Iberian Romance languages (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Féry, C. (2017). Intonation and prosodic structure. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frascarelli, M., & Hinterhölzl, R. (2007). Types of topics in German and Italian. In K. Schwabe & S. Winkler (Eds.), On information structure, meaning and form (pp. 87–116). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gupton, T. (2012). Object clitics in Galician and complications for clausal analyses. In K. Geeslin & M. Díaz-Campos (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 272–284. Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). The syntax-information structure interface. Clausal word order and the left periphery in Galician. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kempchinsky, Paula. (2013). CLLD as a window on the left periphery. In C. Howe, S. Blackwell, & M. Lubbers Quesada, Selected proceedings of the 15th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 310–327). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y. (1972). The categorical and the thetic judgment: Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language, 9(2).153–185.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (2008). Intonational phonology. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leonetti, M., & Escandell-Vidal, M. (2009). Fronting and verum focus in Spanish. In A. Dufter & D. Jacob, Focus and background in Romance languages (pp. 155–204). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López, L. (2009). A derivational syntax for information structure. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loureiro-Rodríguez, V. (2008). Conflicting values at a conflicting age: Linguistic ideologies in Galician adolescents. In M. Niño-Murcia & J. Rothman, Bilingualism and identity: Spanish at the crossroads with other languages (pp. 63–86). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mateo Ruiz, M. (2013). La entonación del español meridional (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murray, K. (2001). A study of automatic pitch tracker doubling/halving ‘errors’. Proceedings of the Second SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue. Aalborg, Denmark. Retrieved on 18 November 2020 from [URL].
Neeleman, A., Titov, E., van de Koot, H., & Vermeulen, R. (2009). A syntactic typology of topic, focus and contrast. In J. Craenenbroeck (Ed.), Alternatives to cartography (pp. 15–51). De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F. (2000). The clausal structure of Spanish: A comparative study. Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Repp, S. (2016). Contrast: Dissecting an elusive information-structural notion and its role in grammar. In C. Féry & S. Ishihara (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure (pp. 270–289). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman, Elements of grammar (pp. 281–337). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sönmez, K., Shriberg, E., Heck, L., & Weintraub, M. (1998). Modeling dynamic prosodic variation for speaker verification. In R. H. Mannell & J. Robert-Ribes (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP’98), Sydney, Australia (Vol. 7, pp. 3189–3193). Australian Speech Science and Technology Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Titov, E. (2012). Encoding focus and contrast in Russian. In A. Neeleman & R. Vermeulen (Eds.), The syntax of topic, focus, and contrast (pp. 119–155). Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanrell, M., & Fernández Soriano, O. (2013). Variation at the interfaces in Ibero-Romance. Catalan and Spanish prosody and word order. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 12, 253–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998). Prosody, focus, and word order. The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Levshina, Natalia, Savithry Namboodiripad, Marc Allassonnière-Tang, Mathew Kramer, Luigi Talamo, Annemarie Verkerk, Sasha Wilmoth, Gabriela Garrido Rodriguez, Timothy Michael Gupton, Evan Kidd, Zoey Liu, Chiara Naccarato, Rachel Nordlinger, Anastasia Panova & Natalia Stoynova
2023. Why we need a gradient approach to word order. Linguistics 61:4 ► pp. 825 ff. DOI logo
Goodall, Grant
2021. Why does D-linking reduce the need for inversion in Spanish wh-questions?. In East and West of The Pentacrest [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 33], ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue