In:East and West of The Pentacrest: Linguistic studies in honor of Paula Kempchinsky
Edited by Timothy Gupton and Elizabeth Gielau
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 33] 2021
► pp. 17–40
Get fulltext
Chapter 1Interpretation of focus in Haitian Creole
se-clefts
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 10 May 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.33.01wal
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.33.01wal
Abstract
While past literature on Haitian Creole focus
structures primarily concentrates on predicate clefts (see DeGraff, 1995; Glaude & Zribi-Hertz,
2012; Harbour,
2008; Lefebvre,
1990), few authors use empirical data to justify proposed
interpretations of clefts. In this paper, we empirically test which
interpretations are available in se-clefts,
expanding on previous work on clefts in Haitian Creole and other
languages. Our first experiment investigates the influence of
predicate gradability (Harbour,
2008) and syntactic structure (Glaude & Zribi-Hertz, 2012) on
predicate cleft interpretation, using a felicity judgment task.
Prior work on Haitian se-clefts has not discussed
the exhaustive inference, an inference conveyed in similar clefts
cross-linguistically (see Destruel et al., 2015; Horn, 1981). Our second experiment examines
the exhaustivity inference in both predicate and nominal
se-clefts, comparing Haitian speakers’
judgments to results from similar clefts in other languages,
particularly French, via a forced-choice task adapted from Onea and Beaver (2011).
Keywords: Clefts, Predicate clefts, Focus, Haitian Creole, French, Information structure
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1What is focus?
- 2.2French and Haitian Creole clefts
- 2.3The syntax of se-clefts
- 2.4Past accounts of the interpretation of (se-)clefts
- 2.5Exhaustivity
- 3.Research questions and hypotheses
- 4.Empirical data
- 4.1Contrast and intensity in predicate clefts
- 4.1.1Goals
- 4.1.2Informants
- 4.1.3Design and materials
- 4.1.4Procedure
- 4.1.5Results
- 4.2Exhaustivity inference
- 4.2.1Informants
- 4.2.2Design and materials
- 4.2.3Procedure
- 4.2.4Results
- 4.1Contrast and intensity in predicate clefts
- 5.Discussion and conclusions
Notes References
References (17)
Casielles-Suárez, E. (1999). Notes on the topic-focus
articulation. In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach & F. Martinez-Gil (Eds.), Advances in hispanic linguistics (pp. 346–363). Cascadilla Press.
DeGraff, M. (1992). Creole grammars and acquisition of syntax: The
case of Haitian (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania.
(1995). Predicate-movement, quantification, events and
properties. Niger-Congo Syntax & Semantics, 6, 69–82.
Destruel, E. (2012). The French c’est-cleft: An
empirical study on its meaning and use. In C. Piñón (Ed.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 9 (pp. 95–112). Retrieved on 18 November
2020 from [URL]
Destruel, E., Velleman, D., Onea, E., Bumford, D., Xue, J., & Beaver, D. (2015). A cross-linguistic study of the non-at-issueness
of exhaustive inferences. In F. Schwarz (Ed.), Experimental perspectives on presuppositions (pp. 135–156). Springer.
Destruel, E., & De Veaugh-Geiss, J. (2017). On the interpretation and processing of
exhaustivity: Evidence of cross-linguistic variation in
clefts. Journal of Pragmatics, 121, 58–75.
Glaude, H., & Zribi-Hertz, A. (2012). Verb focus in Haitian: From lexical reiteration
to predicate cleft. In E. Aboh, N. Smith, & A. Zribi-Hertz (Eds.), The morphosyntax of reiteration in creole and non-creole
languages (pp. 77–134). John Benjamins.
Horn, L. (1981). Exhaustiveness and the semantics of
clefts. In V. Burke & J. Pustejovsky (Eds.), Proceedings of 11th meeting of the North East
Linguistics Society (pp. 125–142). GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
Krifka, M. (2008). Basic notions of information
structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55(3–4), 243–276.
Larson, R., & Lefebvre, C. (1991). Predicate clefting in Haitian
creole. In T. Sherer (Ed.), Proceedings of NELS 21 (pp. 247–261). GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
Onea, E., & Beaver, D. (2011). Hungarian focus is not exhausted. In E. Cormany, S. Ito, & D. Lutz (Eds.), Proceedings of SALT, 19 (pp. 342–359).
Pavlou, N. (2015). Explicit and implicit exhaustivity in
focus. In C. Brown, Q. Gu, C. Loos, J. Mielens, & G. Neveu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Texas Linguistic Society
Conference, Austin TX, USA. Retrieced on 18 November
2020 from [URL]
