Cover not available

In:Aspects of Latin American Spanish Dialectology: In honor of Terrell A. Morgan
Edited by Manuel Díaz-Campos and Sandro Sessarego
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 32] 2021
► pp. 47–68

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 3
Variable constraints on se lo(s) in Mexican Spanish

 | The Ohio State University
 | The Ohio State University
Published online: 12 January 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.32.03sch
Abstract
We examine the alternation between normative se lo/la and se los/las to express a plural indirect object and singular direct object. Using corpus data from Mexico City and Monterrey, we find that significant predictors of the more frequent variant, se los, are number of the verb, referential distance, and presence of a dative prepositional phrase. Contra previous claims that se los marks plurality in ambiguous dative referents, we argue that it serves as an accessibility marker that makes a plural referent more salient if not recently mentioned. Se los is used most frequently with first-person singular verbs, resulting in (near-)fixed expressions. These findings demonstrate the sensitivity of Spanish clitics to discourse-pragmatic context and highlight limitations of sentence-level analysis of morphosyntactic variants.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous literature
  • 3.Research questions and hypotheses
  • 4.Methodology
    • 4.1The corpora
    • 4.2Variable context
    • 4.3Coding of predictors
    • 4.4Statistical methods
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (33)
References
Alvar, M. (2010). El español en México. Estudios, mapas, textos. Madrid, Spain: Universidad de Alcalá.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun phrase antecedents. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belloro, V. (2004). A role and reference grammar account for third-person clitic clusters in Spanish (Unpublished MA Thesis). The State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonet, E. (1995). Feature structure of Romance clitics. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 13, 607–647. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Company, C. (1992). Un cambio en proceso: “El libro, ¿Quién se los prestó?” In E. L. Traill (Ed.), Scripta philologica in honorem Juan M. Lope Blanch (Vol. 2, pp. 349–362). México, DF: UNAM.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). El objeto indirecto. In C. Company (Ed.), Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Primera parte: La frase verbal, (Vol. 1, pp. 479–574). México, DF: UNAM/Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeMello, G. (1992). Se los for se lo in the spoken cultural Spanish of eleven cities. Hispanic Journal, 13, 165–179.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gili y Gaya, S. (1993 [1943]). Curso superior de sintaxis española (15th ed.). Barcelona, Spain: Biblograf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In T. Givón (Ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study (pp. 1–42). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gustafson, G. (2017). Variable number agreement in the Spanish dative pronoun le(s). Ms. The Ohio State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1996). The morphology of Spanish clitics. In H. Campos & P. Kempchinsky (Eds.), Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory (pp. 168–197). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hothorn, T., Hornik, K., & Zeileis, A. (2006). Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15(3), 651–674. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kailuweit, R. (2006). “Floating plurals,” prodrop and agreement – an optimality-based RRG approach. In R. D. Van Valin, Jr. (Ed.), Investigations of the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface (pp. 179–202). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kany, C. (1945). American Spanish Syntax. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lope Blanch, J. M. (Ed.). (1990–2000). Atlas lingüístico de México. México, DF: Colegio de México.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, R. (1965). Manual de gramática histórica española (12th ed.). Madrid, Spain: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moreno de Alba, J. G. (2013a). ‘Se los dije [a ellos]’ por ‘se lo dije [a ellos].’ El Atlas Lingüístico de México. Anuario de Letras. Lingüística y Filología, 1(1), 147–182.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013b). Notas de gramática dialectal (El Atlas Lingüístico de México). México, DF: UNAM.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ordóñez, F. (2011). Clitics in Spanish. In J. I. Hualde, A. Olarrea, & E. O’Rourke (Eds.), The handbook of Hispanic linguistics (pp. 423–451). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rael, J. B. (1940). Associative interference in Spanish. Hispanic Review, 8(4), 346–349. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Real Academia Española. (2005). Diccionario panhispánico de dudas. Madrid, Spain: Santillana/RAE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009). Nueva gramática de la lengua española (2 Vols.). Madrid, Spain: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Real Academia Española: Banco de datos (CREA) [en línea]. Corpus de referencia del español actual. <[URL]> (17 July, 2020).
Reig Alamillo, A. (2009). Cross-dialectal variation in propositional anaphora: Null objects and propositional lo in Mexican and Peninsular Spanish. Language Variation & Change, 21, 381–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Revilla, M. (1910). Provincialismos de expresión en Méjico. In Memorias de la Academia Mexicana de la Lengua VI (pp. 352–367). Mexico, DF: Ediciones del centenario de la Academia Mexicana.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rivarola, J. L. (1985). Se los por se lo. Lexis, 9, 239–244.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero Morales, J. (2008). Los dativos en el español. Madrid, Spain: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sankoff, D. (1988). Sociolinguistics and syntactic variation. In F. Newmeyer (Ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, IV: The socio-cultural context (pp. 140–161). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwenter, S. A. (2006). Null objects across South America. In T. L. Face & C. Klee (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 8th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 23–36). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tippets, I. & Schwenter, S. A. (2007). Relative animacy and differential object marking in Spanish. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 36, Philadelphia, PA.
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Quintanilla, Alex JR
2025. La variación gramático‐léxica del español nicaragüense. In Enciclopedia concisa de los dialectos del español en el mundo, ► pp. 871 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue