In:Advancedness in Second Language Spanish: Definitions, challenges, and possibilities
Edited by Mandy R. Menke and Paul A. Malovrh
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 31] 2021
► pp. 351–366
Chapter 15Advancing notions of advancedness
Clarifying the differential and dynamic effects of working memory across the second language proficiency spectrum
Published online: 8 February 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.31.15ser
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.31.15ser
Abstract
The variable process and outcomes of language
learning in adulthood has motivated decades of research seeking to
explain this variability via learner individual differences (IDs).
However, the impact of learner IDs across the proficiency spectrum
remains unclear, particularly the involvement of cognitive resources
at advanced second language (L2) proficiency. This chapter provides
an overview of learner ID research with a focus on the role of
working memory capacity (WMC) in relation to L2 Spanish, revealing a
lack of research probing the effects of WMC both between and within
learners at varying proficiency. The chapter concludes by calling
for more longitudinal research that investigates how cognitive
ability interacts with socioculturally-grounded, rather than
psycholinguistically-oriented, notions of advancedness and considers
potential pedagogical implications.
Article outline
- Notions and operationalizations of advancedness
- Relationships between learner individual differences (IDs) and L2
development
- Working memory capacity (WMC) and L2 development
- WMC and L2 morphosyntax
- WMC and L2 proficiency
- Summary of findings and gaps
- Future research directions and implications for advanced learning settings
Note References
References (81)
Altman, H. (1980). Foreign
language teaching: Focus on the
learner. In H. Altman & C. Vaughan James (Eds.), Foreign
language teaching: Meeting individual
needs (pp. 1–16). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
American Council on
the Teaching of Foreign
Languages. (2012). ACTFL
proficiency guidelines (3rd
ed.). Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.
Anderson, S. (2014). Individual
differences in and study abroad: Four profiles of oral
proficiency gain. Journal of
Language Teaching and
Research, 5, 477–486.
(2000). The
episodic buffer: A new component of working
memory? Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 4, 417–423.
Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working
memory. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Recent
advances in learning and
motivation (pp. 47–89). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Byrnes, H. (Ed.) (2006). Advanced
language learning: The contribution of Halliday and
Vygotsky. New York, NY: Continuum.
(2012). Advanced
language
proficiency. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of second language
acquisition (pp. 506–521). London, UK: Routledge.
Colombi, M. C. (2006). Grammatical
metaphor: Academic language development in Latino students
in
Spanish. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced
language learning: The contribution of Halliday and
Vygotsky (pp. 147–163). New York, NY: Continuum.
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working
memory span tasks: A methodological review and a user’s
guide. Psychonomic Bulletin
and
Review, 12, 769–786.
Coughlin, C. E., & Tremblay, A. (2013). Proficiency
and working memory-based explanations for nonnative
speakers’ sensitivity to agreement in sentence
processing. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 34, 615–646.
Council of
Europe (2001). Common
European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning,
teaching,
assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
DeKeyser, R. (1997). Beyond
explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language
morphosyntax. Studies in
Second Language
Acquisition, 19, 195–221.
(2015). Skill
acquisition
theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories
in second language acquisition: An
introduction (pp. 94–112). London, UK: Routledge.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The
psychology of the language learner: Individual differences
in second language
acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2009). Individual
differences: Interplay of learner characteristics and
learning
environment. Language
Learning, 59, 230–248.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The
psychology of the language learner
revisited. New York, NY: Routledge.
Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual
differences in second language
learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Individual
differences in second language
learning (pp. 589–630). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Dussias, P. E., & Piñar, P. (2010). Effects
of reading span and plausibility in the reanalysis of wh-
gaps by Chinese-English second language
speakers. Second Language
Research, 26, 443–472.
Ellis, N. C. (2001). Memory for language. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 33–68). Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
Erçetin, G., & Alptekin, C. (2013). The
explicit/implicit knowledge distinction and working memory:
Implications for second-language reading
comprehension. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 34, 727–753.
Foote, R. (2011). Integrated
knowledge of agreement in early and late English-Spanish
bilinguals. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 32, 187–220.
Gilabert, R., & Muñoz, C. (2010). Differences
in attainment and performance in a foreign language: The
role of working memory
capacity. International
Journal of English
Studies, 10(1), 19–42.
Goo, J. (2012). Corrective
feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven
L2 learning. Studies in
Second Language
Acquisition, 34, 445–474.
Grey, S., Cox, J. G., Serafini, E. J., & Sanz, C. (2015). The
role of individual differences in the study abroad context:
Cognitive capacity and language development during
short-term intensive language
exposure. The Modern Language
Journal, 99, 137–157.
Griffiths, C. (Ed.) (2008). Lessons
from good language
learners. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2016). Factors
influencing Spanish instructors’ in-class feedback
decisions. Modern Language
Journal, 100, 255–275.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An
introduction to functional
grammar (2nd
ed.). London, UK: Edward Arnold.
Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). L2
working memory capacity and L2 reading
skill. Studies in Second
Language
Acquisition, 14, 25–38.
Havik, E., Roberts, L., van Hout, R., Schreuder, R., & Haverkort, M. (2009). Processing
subject–object ambiguities in the L2: A self-paced reading
study with German L2 learners of
Dutch. Language
Learning, 59, 73–112.
Hopp, H. (2015). Individual
differences in the second language processing of
object-subject
ambiguities. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 36, 129–173.
Hummel, K. M. (2009). Aptitude,
phonological memory, and second language proficiency in
non-novice adult
learners. Applied
Psycholinguistics 30, 225–249.
Juffs, A. (2004). Representation,
processing and working memory in a second
language. Transactions of the
Philological
Society, 102, 199–225.
(2005). The
influence of first language on the processing of wh-movement
in English as a second
language. Second Language
Research, 21, 121–151.
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects
of working memory in L2
learning. Language
Teaching, 44, 137–166.
Kempe, V., & Brooks, P. J. (2008). Second
language learning of complex inflectional
systems. Language
Learning, 58, 703–746.
Kempe, V., Brooks, P. J., & Kharkhurin, A. (2010). Cognitive
predictors of generalization of Russian grammatical gender
categories. Language
Learning, 60, 127–153.
Kim, Y. J., Payant, C., & Pearson, P. (2015). The
intersection of task-based interaction, task complexity, and
working memory: L2 question development through recasts in a
laboratory setting. Studies
in Second Language
Acquisition, 37, 549–581.
Kormos, J., & Sáfár, A. (2008). Phonological
short-term memory, working memory and foreign language
performance in intensive language
learning. Bilingualism:
Language and
Cognition, 11, 261–271.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2001). Individual
cognitive/affective learner contributions and differential
success in second language
acquisition. In M. Breen (Ed.), Learner
contributions to language learning: New directions in
research (pp. 12–24). London, UK: Routledge.
(2007). Reflecting
on the cognitive-social debate in second language
acquisition. Modern Language
Journal, 91, 773–787.
(2018). Looking
ahead: Future directions in, and future research into,
second language
acquisition. Modern Language
Journal, 51, 55–72.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991). An
introduction to second language acquisition
research. London, UK: Longman.
Leow, R. (2015). Explicit
learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered
approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
Li, S. (2017). An
exploratory study on the role of foreign language aptitudes
in instructed pragmatics learning in L2
Chinese. Chinese as a Second
Language
Research, 6, 103–128.
Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working
memory and second language comprehension and
production. Psychonomic
Bulletin
Review, 21, 861–883.
Linck, J. A. & Weiss, D. J. (2011). Working
memory predicts the acquisition of explicit L2
knowledge. In C. Sanz & R. P. Leow (Eds.), Implicit
and explicit language learning: Conditions, processes, and
knowledge in SLA and
bilingualism (pp. 101–113). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Logie, R. H. (2011). The
functional organization and capacity limits of working
memory. Current Directions in
Psychological
Science, 20, 240–245.
Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual
differences in working memory, noticing of interactional
feedback and L2
development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual
differences and instructed language
learning (pp. 181–209). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (1998). Individual
differences in second language proficiency: Working memory
as language
aptitude. In A. Healy & L. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign
language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and
retention (pp. 339–365). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nowbakht, M. (2019). The
role of working memory, language proficiency, and learners’
age in second language English learners’ processing and
comprehension of anaphoric
sentences. Journal of
Psycholinguistics
Research, 48, 353–370.
O’Brien, I., Segalowitz, N., Freed, B., & Collentine, J. (2007). Phonological
memory predicts oral fluency
gains. Studies in Second
Language
Acquisition, 29, 557–582.
Oxford, R. L., & Ehrman, M. (1992). Second
language research on individual
differences. Annual Review of
Applied
Linguistics, 13, 188–205.
Ortega, L., & Byrnes, H. (2008). The
longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities: An
introduction. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The
longitudinal study of advanced L2
capacities (pp. 3–20). New York, NY: Routledge.
Ortega, L., & Iberri-Shea, G. (2005). Longitudinal
research in second language acquisition: Recent trends and
future directions. Annual
Review of Applied
Linguistics, 25, 26–45.
Robinson, P. (2005). Aptitude
and second language
acquisition. Annual Review of
Applied
Linguistics, 25, 46–73.
Sagarra, N. (2008). Working
memory and L2 processing of redundant grammatical
forms. In Z. Han (Ed.), Understanding
second language
process (pp. 133–147). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
(2013). Working
memory in second language
acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The
encyclopedia of applied
linguistics (pp. 1–8). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sagarra, N., & Herschensohn, J. (2010). The
role of proficiency and working memory in gender and number
agreement processing in L1 and L2
Spanish. Lingua, 120, 2022–2039.
Sanz, C. (2005). Mind
and context in adult second language
acquisition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Sanz, C., Lin, H.-J., Lado, B., Bowden, H. W., & Stafford, C. A. (2014). One
size fits all? Learning conditions and working memory
capacity in Ab initio language
development. Applied
Linguistics, 37, 669–692.
Sawyer, M., & Ranta, L. (2001). Aptitude,
individual differences, and instructional
design. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition
and second language
instruction (pp. 319–353). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Segalowitz, N. (2003). Automaticity
and second
language. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook
of second language
acquisition (pp. 382–408). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Serafini, E. J. (2017). Exploring
the dynamic long-term interaction between cognitive and
psychosocial resources in adult second language development
at varying proficiency. The
Modern Language
Journal, 101, 369–390.
Serafini, E. J., & Sanz, C. (2016). Evidence
for the decreasing impact of cognitive ability on second
language development as proficiency
increases. Studies in Second
Language
Acquisition, 38, 607–646.
Sunderman, G., & Kroll, J. F. (2009). When
study-abroad experience fails to deliver: The internal
resources threshold
effect. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 30, 79–99.
Taguchi, N. (2008a). Longitudinal
gain of higher-order inferential abilities in L2 English:
Accuracy, speed, and
conventionality. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The
longitudinal study of advanced L2
capacities (pp. 203–222). New York, NY: Routledge.
(2008b). The
effect of working memory, semantic access, and listening
abilities on the comprehension of conversational
implicatures in L2
English. Pragmatics &
Cognition, 16, 517–539.
Taguchi, N., & Li, S. (2017). Introduction
to a thematic review: Pragmatics research in Chinese as a
second language. Chinese as a
Second Language
Research, 6, 1–6.
Tremblay, A. (2011). Proficiency
assessment standards in second language acquisition
research. Studies in Second
Language
Acquisition, 33, 339–372.
Trude, A. M., & Tokowicz, N. (2011). Negative
transfer from Spanish and English to Portuguese
pronunciation: The roles of inhibition and working
memory. Language
Learning, 61, 259–280.
Van den Noort, M., Bosch, P., & Hugdahl, K. (2006). Foreign
language proficiency and working memory
capacity. European
Psychologist, 11, 289–296.
Wen, Z. (2016). Working
memory and second language learning: Towards an integrated
approach. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
