Cover not available

In:Current Theoretical and Applied Perspectives on Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics
Edited by Diego Pascual y Cabo and Idoia Elola
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 27] 2020
► pp. 153–174

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 7
Neural evidence for the processing of referential ambiguity and referential failure in Spanish

 | University of Kansas
 | University of Kansas
 | University of Kansas | Montclair State University
 | University of Kansas
Published online: 4 June 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.27.07fer
Abstract
The present study uses event-related potentials (ERPs) to examine how native Spanish speakers comprehend overt pronouns in two referentially challenging contexts: sentences in which a pronoun has two gender-matching antecedents (referential ambiguity), and sentences in which there are no gender-matching antecedents (referential failure). Participants read these sentences for comprehension while their brain activity was recorded. Results revealed a sustained positivity for referentially ambiguous pronouns, in contrast to a sustained negativity observed in previous studies of English and Dutch, and a positivity (P600) for referential failure, in line with previous studies. There was no relationship between ERPs and working memory measures. These results suggest that speakers of different languages may differ in how they process referential ambiguity, but not referential failure.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Relevant theoretical background
    • 2.1Subject pronouns in Spanish
    • 2.2Referential ambiguity in Spanish
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Materials
    • 3.3Procedure
    • 3.4Data acquisition
    • 3.5Analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Comprehension questions and pronominal reference survey
    • 4.2Experiment 1: Referential ambiguity (500–1400 ms)
    • 4.3Experiment 2: Referential failure (600–900 ms)
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Experiment 1 (referential ambiguity)
    • 5.2Experiment 2 (referential failure)
    • 5.3Future directions: Implications for bilingual processing
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (41)
References
Alemán Bañón, J., Gabriele, A., & Fiorentino, R. (2012). The processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish: An event-related potential investigation of the effects of structural distance. Brain Research, 1456, 49–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayley, R., & Pease-Álvarez, L. (1996). Null and expressed pronoun variation in Mexican-descent children’s Spanish. In J. Arnold, R. Blake, & B. Davidson (Eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Data, theory, and analysis (pp. 85–99). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Null pronoun variation in Mexican-descent children’s narrative discourse. Language Variation and Change, 9, 349–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bentivoglio, P. (1983). Topic continuity and discontinuity in discourse: A study of spoken Latin American Spanish. In T. Givón (Ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study (pp. 255–311). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1987). Los sujetos pronominales de primera persona en el habla de Caracas. Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boudewyn, M. A., Long, D. L., Traxler, M. J., Lesh, T. A., Dave, S., Mangun, G. R., Carter, C. S., & Swaab, T. Y. (2015). Sensitivity to referential ambiguity in discourse: The role of attention, working memory, and verbal ability. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(12), 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burkhardt, P. (2006). Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language, 98(2), 159–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, R. (1992). Pronominal and null subject variation in Spanish: Constraints, dialects, and functional compensation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
(1994). Switch reference, verb class and priming in a variable syntax. In K. Beals (ed.), Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: Volume 2: The parasession on variation in linguistic theory, 27–45. Chicago, IL: CLS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). The scope and limits of switch-reference as a constraint on pronominal subject expression. Hispanic Linguistics, 6(7), 1–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carreiras, M., Garnham, A., & Oakhill, J. (1993). The use of superficial and meaning-based representations in interpreting pronouns: Evidence from Spanish. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5(1), 93–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carvalho, A. M., & Child, M. (2011). Subject pronoun expression in a variety of Spanish in contact with Portuguese. In J. Michnowicz & R. Dodsworth (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics (pp. 14–25). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carvalho, A. M., Orozco, R., & Shin, N. L. (2015). Introduction. In A. M. Carvalho, R. Orozco, & N. L. Shin (Eds.), Subject pronoun expression in Spanish: A cross-dialectal perspective (pp. xiii–xxvi). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12(5), 769–786. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enríquez, E. V. (1984). El pronombre personal sujeto en la lengua española hablada en Madrid [The subject personal pronoun in the Spanish language spoken in Madrid]. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Instituto Miguel de Cervantes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flores-Ferrán, N. (2004). Spanish subject personal pronoun use in New York City Puerto Ricans: Can we rest the case of English contact? Language Variation and Change, 16, 49–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friederici, A., & Weissenborn, J. (2007). Mapping sentence form onto meaning: The syntax-semantic interface. Brain Research, 1146, 50–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garnham, A. (2001). Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goikoietxea, E., Pascual, G., & Acha, C. (2008). Normative study of the implicit causality of 100 interpersonal verbs in Spanish. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 760–772. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hochberg, J. (1986). Functional compensation for /s/ deletion in Puerto Rican Spanish. Language, 62(3), 609–621. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jegerski, J., VanPatten, B., & Keating, G. D. (2011). Cross-linguistic variation and the acquisition of pronominal reference in L2 Spanish. Second Language Research, 27(4), 481–507. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaan, E. (2007). Event-related potentials and language processing: A brief overview. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(6), 571–591. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2004). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 125–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Bilingual background questionnaire for Spanish/English speakers. The National Heritage Language Resource Center. Retrieved from <[URL]> (12 November, 2019).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morales, A. (1997). La hipótesis funcional y la aparición de sujeto no nominal: El español de Puerto Rico. Hispania, 80(1), 153–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nieuwland, M. S. (2014). “Who’s he?” Event-related brain potentials and unbound pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nieuwland, M. S., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2006). Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: Evidence from ERPs. Brain Research, 1118, 155–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Osterhout, L., & Mobley, L. A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 739–773. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Otheguy, R., Zentella, A. C., & Livert, D. (2007). Language and dialect contact in Spanish in New York: Toward the formation of a speech community. Language, 83(4), 770–802. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shin, N. L., & Cairns, H. S. (2012). The development of NP selection in school-age children: Reference and Spanish subject pronouns. Language Acquisition, 19(1), 3–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shin, N. L. & Montes-Alcalá, C. (2014). El uso contextual del pronombre sujeto como factor predictivo de la influencia del inglés en el español en Nueva York. Sociolinguistic Studies, 8(1). 85–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (1994). Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva-Pereyra, J., Gutiérrez-Sigut, E., & Carreiras, M. (2012). An ERP study of coreference in Spanish: Semantic and grammatical gender cues. Psychophysiology, 49, 1401–1411. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F. (2006). Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22(3), 339–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliaferri, B. (2005). Paradigm [Software] (Version 1.0). Lawrence, KS: Perception Research Systems. <[URL]> (14 November, 2019).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R., & Travis, C. (2010). Variable yo expression in New Mexico: English influence? In S. Rivera-Mills & D. V. Crésap (Eds.), Spanish of the U.S. southwest: A language in transition (pp. 189–210). Madrid/Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (1999). Early referential context effects in sentence processing: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 147–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., & Zwitserlood, P. (2003). Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 40, 235–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Sadeghi, Karim
2022. Morphosyntactic Processing in SLA: An Interview with Alison Gabriele. In Talking About Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue