In:Linguistic Approaches to Portuguese as an Additional Language
Edited by Karina Veronica Molsing, Cristina Becker Lopes Perna and Ana Maria Tramunt Ibaños
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 24] 2020
► pp. 109–148
The Lexical Aspect Hypothesis
Off-line evidence from Chinese learners of European Portuguese as an L2
Published online: 26 March 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.24.05mar
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.24.05mar
Abstract
This chapter investigates the acquisition of tense and aspect by Chinese learners of Portuguese as an L2 from a variationist perspective (Bayley, 2013). Difficulties in acquiring the aspectual contrasts set by the Perfect Preterit and Imperfect Preterit tenses in Romance languages have been widely documented (Blyth, 2005; Giacalone-Ramat, 2002; Kihlstedt, 2002; Martins, 2008). This study investigates the role of <lexical aspect> for the marking of Perfect and Imperfect Preterit following the tenets of the Lexical Aspect Hypothesis (LAH). It intends to design a different look into the LAH, as it considers other variables in interaction. Results show that lexical aspect plays a significant role in the learners’ use of inflectional morphology for both verb tenses, showing the dynamics of the interlanguage continuum.
Keywords: Aspect Hypothesis, SLA, L2 verbal morphology, Portuguese, Chinese
Article outline
- Introduction
- 1.The Lexical Aspect Hypothesis: Literature review
- 1.1The Lexical Aspect Hypothesis: LAH
- 1.2The Lexical Aspect Hypothesis in Romance languages
- 2.Inflectional morphology
- 2.1Variation
- 3.The categories of tense and aspect in Portuguese and Chinese
- 3.1Tense and aspect in Portuguese
- 3.2Tense and aspect in Chinese (Mandarin and Cantonese)
- 3.2.1Cantonese
- 4.Verb semantics: identification of verb properties
- 5.The study: Methodological procedures
- 5.1Introduction
- 5.2Participants
- 5.3Instruments of data collection
- 6.Discussion of the results
- 6.1Results for Perfect Preterit: Discussion
- 6.1.1Lexical aspect
- 6.1.2Length of exposure
- 6.2Results for Imperfect Preterit
- 6.2.1Grammatical aspect
- 6.2.2Type of task
- 6.1Results for Perfect Preterit: Discussion
- 7.Conclusions
Notes References
References (72)
Andersen, R. (1991). Developmental sequences: The emergence of aspect marking in second language acquistion. In T. Huebner & C. Ferguson (Eds.), Cross-currents in second language acquistion and linguistics theories (pp. 305–324). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2002). The dimensions of pastness. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 79–107). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Andersen, R., & Shirai, Y. (1994). Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 133–156.
(1996). The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The Pidgin-creole connection. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 527–570). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Ao, S. H. (2013). Aquisição de morfologia verbal do português Europeu: Um caso de aprendentes de chinês-L1 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Macau.
Ayoun, D. (2005). The acquisition of tese and aspect in L2 French from a Universal Grammar perspective. In D. Ayoun & M.R. Salaberry (Eds.), Tense and aspect on Romance languages (pp.79–128). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ayoun, D., & Salaberry, R. (2005). Towards a comprehensive model of the acquisition of L2 tense-aspect in the Romance languages. In D. Ayoun & M. R. Salaberry (Eds.), Tense and aspect in romance languages (pp. 253–282). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). From morpheme studies to temporal semantics – Tense-aspect research in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 471–508.
Bayley, R. (1994). Interlanguage variation and the quantitative paradigm: Past-tense marking in Chinese-English. In E. Tarone, S. M. Gass, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 157–181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2013). Data analysis: Quantitative approaches. In R. Salaberry & L. Comajoan (Eds.), Research design and methodology in studies on L2 tense and aspect (pp. 357–390). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bergström, A. (1995). The expression of past temporal reference by English-speaking learners of French (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.
Blyth, C. (2005). From empirical findings to the teaching of aspectual distinctions. In R. Salaberry & D. Ayoun (Eds.), Tense and aspect in romance languages (pp. 211–252). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cedergren, H. J., & Sankoff, D. (1974). Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language, 50(2), 333–355.
Chambers, J. K. (2008). Studying language variation: An informal epistemology. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chan, H. L. (2012). Tense-aspect processing in second language learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh.
Chen, J., & Shirai, Y. (2010). The development of aspectual marking in Mandarin Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 1–28.
Comajoan, L. (2006). The aspect hypothesis: Development of morphology and appropriateness of use. Language Learning, 56(2), 201–268.
Comajoan, L., & Pérez Saldanya, M. (2005). Grammaticalization and language acquisition: Interaction of lexical aspect and discourse. In D. Eddington (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 6th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 44–55). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Coppieters, R. (1987). Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language, 63, 544–573.
Duff, P., & Duanduan, L. (2002). The acquisition and use of perfective aspect in Mandarin. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 417–456). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ellis, R. (1994). Variability and the natural order hypothesis. In R. M. Barasch & C. Vaughn James (Eds.), Beyond the monitor model – Comments on current theory and practice in second language acquisition (pp. 139–158). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Gabriele, A., Martohardjono, G., & McClure, W. (2005). Evaluating the role of the L1 in the L2 acquisition of aspect: A study of Japanese learners of English. In J. Cohen, K. T. McAlister, K. Rolstad, & J. MacSwan (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biligualism (pp. 808–826). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Gabriele, A., & Maekawa, J. (2008). Interpreting tense in a second language. Eurosla Yearbook, 8, 79–106.
Giacalone-Ramat, A. (2002). How do learners acquire the classical three categories of temporality? Evidence from L2 Italian. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 221–248). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hasbún, L. (1995). The role of lexical aspect in the acquisition of tense/aspect in L2 Spanish (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington.
Howard, M. (2002). Prototypical and non-prototypical marking in the advanced learner’s aspectuo-temporal system. Eurosla Yearbook, 2, 87–114.
Kanno, K. (1998). Consistency and variation in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 14(4), 376–388.
Kihlstedt, M. (2002). Reference to past events in dialogue: The acquisition of tense and aspect by advanced learners of French. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 323–362). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Labeau, E. (2005). Beyond the Aspect Hypothesis – Tense-aspect development in advanced L2 French. Eurosla Yearbook, 5, 77–101.
Lakshmanan, U., & Selinker, L. (2001). Analysing interlanguage: How do we know what learners know? Second Language Research, 17(4), 393–420.
Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. (1989). Mandarin Chinese – A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Li, Ping. (1990). Aspect and aktionsart in child Mandarin (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Leiden University.
Li, P. & Shirai, Y. (2000). The acquistion of lexical and gramatical aspect. Berlin: Mouten De Gruyter.
Leung, Y.-K. I. L. (2006). Verb morphology in second language versus third language acquisition – The representation of regular and irregular past participles in English-Spanish and Chinese-English-Spanish interlanguages. Eurosla Yearbook, 6, 27–56.
Liu, J. (2016). Efeitos de transferência semântica no processo de aquisição da morfologia verbal por aprendentes chineses de português como L2 (Unpublished master’s dissertation). University of Macau.
Moens, M., Y Steedman, M. T. (1987). Temporal ontology in natural language. In Proceedings of the 25th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 1–7). Stroudsburg, PA: ACL.
Martins, C. (2008). A aquisição das noções de tempo e aspecto por aprendentes chineses de português como língua estrangeira (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Macau.
McManus, K. (2011). The development of aspect in a second language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Newcastle University, UK.
Oliveira, F. (2003). Tempo e aspecto. In M. H. M. Mateus, A. M. Brito, I. Duarte, I. Hub Faria (Eds.), Gramática da língua portuguesa. Lisbon: Caminho.
Oliveira, F., & Lopes, A. (1995). Tense and aspect in Portuguese. In R. Thieroff (Ed.), Tense systems in european languages, Vol. II. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Paolillo, J. C. (2002). Analyzing linguistic variation – Statistical models and methods. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Pieneman, M. (2007). Variation and dynamic systems in SLA. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 43–45.
Preston, D. (1996). Variation linguistics and second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 229–268). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Rebelo, C. M. B. (2010). Aquisição morfológica de perfeito e imperfeito em português L2. (Unpublished masters thesis). FCSH, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal.
Robinson, P. (2001). Individual differences, cognitive abilities, aptitude complexes and learning conditions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 17(4), 368–292.
Rocca, S. (2002). Lexical aspect in child second language acquisition of temporal morphology: a bi-directional study. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 249–284). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2005). Italian tense-aspect morphology in child L2 acquisition. In R. Salaberry & D. Ayoun (Eds.), Tense and aspect in romance languages (pp. 129–178). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Romaine, S. (2008). Variation. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 410–435). Oxford: Blackwell.
Rossi, F. (2009). Connectionist modelling of aspect acquisition in Italian L2. Eurosla Yearbook 9, 4–32.
Rothman, J. (2008). Aspect selection in adult L2 Spanish and the competing systems hypothesis – When pedagogical and linguistic rules conflict. Languages in Contrast, 8(1), 74–106.
Rothman, J., & Iverson, M. (2008). Poverty-of-the-stimulus and SLA epistemology: Considering L2 knowledge of aspectual phrasal semantics. Language Acquisition, 15, 270–314.
Salaberry, R. (1999). The development of past tense verbal morphology in classroom L2 Spanish. Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 151–178.
(2000). The acquisition of English past tense in an instructional setting: Irregular and frequent morphology. System, 28, 1–18.
(2002). Tense and aspect in the selection of Spanish past tense verbal morphology. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 323–362). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2010). Assessing the effect of lexical aspect and grounding on the acquisition of L2 Spanish past tense morphology among L1 English speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14(2), 1–19.
Salaberry, R., & Lopez Ortega, N. (1998). Accurate L2 production across language tasks: Focus on form, focus on meaning, and communicative control. Modern Language Journal, 82, 514–532.
Salaberry, R., & Shirai, Y. (2002). L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Salaberry, R., & Ayoun, D. (2005). The development of L2 tense-aspect in the Romance languages. In R. Salaberry & D. Ayoun (Eds.), Tense and aspect in romance languages (pp. 1–33). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shirai, Y. (2004). A multiple-factor account for the form-meaning connections in the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. In J. Williams, B. VanPatten, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 91–112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slabakova, R. (2009). How is inflectional morphology learned? Eurosla Yearbook, 9, 56–75.
Towell, R. (2003). Second language acquisition research in search of an interface. In R. van Hout, A. Hulk, F. Kuiken, & R. Towell (Eds.), The lexicon-syntax interface in second language acquisition (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Xiao, R., & McEnery, T. (2004). Aspect in Mandarin Chinese – A corpus based-study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Young, R., & Bayley, R. (1996). VARBRUL analysis for second language acquisition research. In R. Bayley & D. Preston (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (pp. 253–306). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
