In:Recent Advances in the Study of Spanish Sociophonetic Perception
Edited by Whitney Chappell
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 21] 2019
► pp. 265–285
Chapter 9Spoken word recognition and shesheo in Northwestern Mexico
A preliminary investigation into the effects of sociophonetic variability on auditory lexical access
Published online: 28 November 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.21.10vel
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.21.10vel
This study investigates the auditory lexical processing of the two main variants of “ch” (as in charco ‘puddle’) used in the Spanish spoken in northwestern Mexico. A feature of this dialect is the variable implementation of “ch” either as an affricate, [tʃ], or a fricative, [ʃ]. We designed an auditory lexical decision task with auditory priming to explore the effects (if any) of this variability on the recognition of words by members of this community. Target words were presented with either variant as their word-initial consonant (e.g., [tʃ]arco ~ [ʃ]arco), and they were preceded by auditory primes with a matching variant ([tʃ]arco-[tʃ]arco, [ʃ]arco-[ʃ]arco), a mismatching variant ([tʃ]arco-[ʃ]arco, [ʃ]arco-[tʃ]arco), or an unrelated prime. The results show that members of this community are equally likely to accept Spanish word forms produced with either variant. Furthermore, both variants primed listeners equally effectively in their recognition of spoken words, suggesting that both activate the same entry in their mental lexicon (as opposed to parallel representations). Finally, recognition was found to be faster when the word-initial phonetic variant was [tʃ]; this suggests a privilege of [tʃ] over [ʃ] at some level of representation. The results support the claim that, in cases of sociophonetic variability, members of the speech community may include more than one phonetic variant in their mental representation of words, but that, even in such cases, one of the variants may take processing precedence over the other. These results, in turn, suggest it is possible that the nature of the mental representations of an individual are particularly affected by the dialect spoken in their speech community.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Review of the literature
- Shesheo and Norteño Mexican Spanish
- Phonetic variability and spoken word recognition
- The present study
- Review of the literature
- Method
- Participants
- Design and materials
- Stimuli
- Procedure
- Analysis
- Results
- Recognition rates
- Response latencies
- Discussion
- Summary of findings
- Interpretation and implications
- Conclusion
Notes References
References (50)
Adank, P., Evans, B. G., Stuart-Smith, J., & Scott, S. K. (2009). Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 35, 520–529.
Alessi Molina, M. T., & Torres Díaz, M. L. (1994). Aspectos fonéticos del habla sonorense. In G. López Cruz & J. L. Moctezuma Zamarrón (Eds.), Estudios de lingüística y sociolingüística (pp.285–292). Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico: Universidad de Sonora.
Amastae, J. (1996). Variación y cambio en el español de Ciudad Juárez, México. Ciudad Juárez, Mexico: Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez.
Brown, D. (1989). El habla juvenil de Sonora, México: La fonética de 32 jóvenes. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 37, 43–82.
Carreón Serna, Y. A. (2007). La lenición en el español del norte de México y otras lenguas romances: Una aproximación a la variación sociolingüística y un modelo formal basado en la Teoría de la Optimidad (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of California, Santa Barbara.
Casillas, J. V. (2012). La fricativización del africado /tʃ/ en el habla de las mujeres del sur de Arizona. Divergencias 10, 56–69.
Cedergren, H. (1973). The interplay of social and linguistic factors in Panama (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Cornell University.
Connine, C. M. (2004). It’s not what you hear but how often you hear it: on the neglected role of phonological variant frequency in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, 1084–1089.
Connine, C. M., Ranbom, L. J., & Patterson, D. J. (2008). Processing variant forms in spoken word recognition: The role of variant frequency. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 403–411.
Deelman, T., & Connine, C. M. (2001). Missing information in spoken word recognition: Nonreleased stop consonants. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 27, 656–663.
Fails, W. C. (1984). An analysis of the consonantal phonemes of the educated norm of Havana (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Texas at Austin.
Floccia, C., Goslin, J., Girard, F., & Konopczynski, G. (2006). Does a regional accent perturb speech processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 32, 1276–1293.
Foulkes, P., Docherty, G. J., & Watt, D. (2005). Phonological variation in child-directed speech. Language 81, 177–206.
Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review 105, 251–279.
Goldinger, S. D., Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1989). Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: Effects of competition and inhibition. Journal of Memory and Language 28, 501–518.
Herrera Zendejas, E. (2006). El debilitamiento de /tʃ/ en dos variedades del español americano. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 54, 557–569.
Howes, D. (1957). On the relation between the intelligibility and frequency of occurrence of English words. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 29, 296–305.
Hualde, J. I., Simonet, M., & Nadeu, M. (2011). Consonant lenition and phonological recategorization. Laboratory Phonology 2, 301–329.
Jaramillo, J. A. (1986). Variation in /ch/ and second person address in the Spanish of Tomé, New Mexico (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of New Mexico.
Jaramillo, J. A., & Bills, G. D. (1982). The phoneme /ch/ in the Spanish of Tomé, New Mexico. In F. Barkin, E. A. Brandt, & J. Ornstein-Galicia (Eds.), Bilingualism and language contact: Spanish, English, and Native American languages (pp.154–165). New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Lawrence, M. A. (2016). Easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Llompart, M., & Simonet, M. (2018). Unstressed vowel reduction across Majorcan Catalan dialects: Production and spoken word recognition. Language and Speech 63, 430–465.
LoCasto, P. C., & Connine, C. M. (2002). Rule-governed missing information in spoken word recognition: schwa vowel deletion. Perception & Psychophysics 64, 208–219.
Lope Blanch, J. M. (1990–2000). Atlas Lingüístico de México, Vol. 1–6. Mexico City, Mexico: El Colegio de México – UNAM – FCE.
Martín Butragueño, P. (2009). Regularidad y excepcionalidad del cambio lingüístico: El caso de (tʃ) en la geografía fónica de México. Mexico City, Mexico: El Colegio de México.
(2011). Dialectología de nuevos mundos: Una lectura variacionista del Atlas Lingüístico de México. In L. A. Ortiz López (Ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 13th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp.17–32). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
(2014). La división dialectal del español mexicano. In P. Martín Butragueño (Ed.), Historia sociolingüística de México (pp.1353–1408). Mexico City, Mexico: El Colegio de México.
McLennan, C. T., Luce, P. A., & Charles-Luce, J. (2003). Representation of lexical form. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29, 539.
Melguizo Moreno, E. (2007). La fricatización de /č/ en una comunidad de hablantes granadina. Interlingüística 17, 748–757.
Méndez, L. A. (2017). The variant [ʃ] in the Spanish of Ciudad Juárez. Borealis – An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 6, 243–260.
Moreno de Alba, J. G. (1994). La pronunciación del español en México. Mexico City, Mexico: El Colegio de México.
Norris, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2008). Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological Review 115, 357–395.
Pitt, M. A. (2009). How are pronunciation variants of spoken words recognized? A test of generalization to newly learned words. Journal of Memory and Language 61(1), 19–36.
Quilis, A., & Vaquero, M. (1973). Realizaciones de /č/ en el área metropolitana de San Juan de Puerto Rico. Revista de Filología Española 56, 1–52.
Quintanilla-Aguilar, J. R. A. (2013). Observaciones sobre el estado del sonido fricativo palatal sordo en el español salvadoreño. Revista de Investigación Lingüística 16, 165–176.
R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Ranbom, L. J., & Connine, C. M. (2007). Lexical representation of phonological variation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 57, 273–298.
Serrano Morales, J. C. (2000). Contacto dialectal (¿y cambio lingüístico?) en español: El caso de la /tʃ/ sonorense. In P. Martín Butragueño (Ed.), Estructuras en contexto: Estudios de variación lingüística (pp.45–59). Mexico City, Mexico: El Colegio de México.
(2002). Variación y cambio lingüístico en migrantes sonorenses (Unpublished BA Thesis). Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico City, Mexico.
(2009). Existe el noroeste mexicano como zona dialectal. In E. Mendoza, M. López, & I. E. Moreno (Eds.), Lengua, literatura y región (pp.107–130). Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico: Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa.
Sumner, M., & Kataoka, R. (2013). Effects of phonetically-cued talker variation on semantic encoding. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134, EL485.
Sumner, M., Kim, S. K., King, E., & McGowan, K. (2014). The socially weighted encoding of spoken words: a dual-route approach to speech perception. Frontiers in Psychology 4, 1015.
Sumner, M., & Samuel, A. G. (2005). Perception and representation of regular variation: The case of final /t/. Journal of Memory and Language 52, 322–338.
(2009). The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants. Journal of Memory and Language 60, 487–501.
Torchiano, M. (2017). effsize: A collection of functions to compute the standardized effects sizes for experiments (Version 0.7.1). Retrieved from <[URL]>
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
