In:Complement Clauses in Portuguese: Syntax and acquisition
Edited by Ana Lúcia Santos and Anabela Gonçalves
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 17] 2018
► pp. 361–392
How Portuguese children interpret subject pronouns in complement clauses
Effects of mood selection and position of antecedent
Published online: 16 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.17.12sil
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.17.12sil
This study aimed to verify if Portuguese children show an interpretative asymmetry between null and overt subject pronouns in indicative and subjunctive complement clauses. In the indicative, children overaccepted the dispreferred coreferential reading with overt pronouns (argued to be licensed post-syntactically); children performed more adult-like with null pronouns (considered to be licensed in syntax) when there was only one intrasentential antecedent (the matrix subject). However, when a matrix object antecedent was added between the preferred matrix subject antecedent and the null embedded subject pronoun, they often accepted the dispreferred reading of disjoint reference. In subjunctive clauses, children incorrectly assigned coreferential readings to both pronouns. We assume that subjunctive obviation is partly dependent on lexical-semantic knowledge, taking time to be acquired.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Interpreting subject pronouns in finite complement clauses in EP
- 3.Cross-linguistic research in the acquisition of pronominal subjects in complement clauses: Some interpretative patterns
- 4.Hypotheses and predictions
- 5.Experiment
- 5.1Methodology
- 5.2Participants
- 5.3Test A1
- 5.4Test A2
- 5.5Test B
- 6.Discussion
- 6.1The status of subject pronouns in the indicative
- 6.2Position of the matrix indirect object antecedent preceding the null subject pronoun
- 6.3Lexical-semantic properties of the matrix verbs selecting the subjunctive
- 6.4Specificities of the subjunctive obviation
- 7.Conclusions
Notes References
References (22)
Agostinho, C. (2014). The acquisition of control in European Portuguese complement clauses (Unpublished MA dissertation). Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa.
Ambar, M., & Vasconcelos, M. (2012). Conjuntivo em Português: Revisitando a análise de Isabel Hub Faria. In A. Costa & I. Duarte (Eds.), Nada na linguagem lhe é estranho. Homenagem a Isabel Hub Faria (pp. 533–551). Porto: Edições Afrontamento.
Avrutin, S., & Wexler, K. (1999/2000). Children’s knowledge of subjunctive clauses: Obviation, binding and reference. Language Acquisition, 8(1), 69–102.
Brito, A. M. (1991). Ligação, co-referência e o princípio evitar o pronome. Actas do Encontro de Homenagem a Óscar Lopes, 101‑121. Lisboa: APL.
Cardinaletti, A., & Starke, M. (1999). The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe (pp. 145‑233). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Carminati, M. N. (2002). The processing of Italian subject pronouns (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Chomsky, N. (1982). Lectures on government and binding. The Pisa lectures (2nd revised ed.). Dordrecht: Foris.
Costa, J., & Ambulate, J. (2010). The acquisition of embedded subject pronouns in European Portuguese. In M. Iverson, I. Ivanov, T. Judy, J. Rothman, R. Slabakova, & M. Tryzna (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2009 Mind/Context Divide Workshop (pp. 1‑12). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Grolla, E. (2006). The acquisition of A- and A’-bound pronouns in Brazilian Portuguese. In V. Torrens & L. Escobar (Eds.), The acquisition of syntax in Romance languages (pp. 227‑250). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lobo, M. (2013). Dependências referenciais. In E. B. P. Raposo, M. F. B. Nascimento, M. A. C. Mota, L. Segura, & A. Mendes (Eds.), Gramática do português (Vol. 2, pp. 2177–2227). Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
Meireles, J., & Raposo, E. (1983). Subjunctives and disjoint reference in Portuguese: Some implications for the Binding Theory. Paper presented at the 1er Colloqui Internacional de Lingüistica Teòrica i Llengues Romàniques, Sitges.
Montalbetti, M. (1986). How pro is it? In O. Jaeggli & C. Silva-Corvalán (Eds.), Studies in Romance linguistics (pp. 137‑152). Dordrecht: Foris.
Raposo, E. (1985). Some asymmetries in the binding theory in Romance. The Linguistic Review, 5, 75‑110.
Reinhart, T. (2004). The processing cost of reference-set computation: Acquisition of stress shift and focus. Language Acquisition, 12, 109‑155.
Silva, C. (2015). Interpretation of clitic, strong and null pronouns in the acquisition of European Portuguese (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
