Cover not available

In:Studies in Historical Ibero-Romance Morpho-Syntax
Edited by Miriam Bouzouita, Ioanna Sitaridou and Enrique Pato
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 16] 2018
► pp. 173–194

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 8
On the position of overt subjects in infinitival clauses in Spanish and Portuguese

Pragmatic, semantic and frequency-based motivations

 | Universitat Jaume I
Published online: 17 July 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.16.08sch
Abstract
A synchronic survey of prepositional infinitive clauses reveals that the position of the subject depends heavily on the preposition heading the infinitival clause; however, equivalent prepositions in Spanish and Portuguese do not necessarily trigger a preference for the same word order. The differences can best be explained if the overt subject infinitive is analysed not as a single construction, but as a cover term for a series of related but independent constructions that are, diachronically, subject to different semantic, pragmatic and analogical pressures. Subsequent entrenchment of the most frequent patterns can eventually cause the subject to appear either in pre- or post-infinitival position by default. This process affects Spanish more than Portuguese, where the availability of an ‘inflected infinitive’ brings the syntax of infinitival clauses more into line with that of finite ones.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Overt subjects in Spanish and Portuguese infinitival clauses
    • 2.1Present-day distribution
    • 2.2The Portuguese inflected infinitive
  • 3.The position of the overt subject in relation to the infinitive
    • 3.1A general overview
      • 3.1.1Spanish
      • 3.1.2Portuguese
    • 3.2The position of pronominal subjects of infinitives in Portuguese adverbial clauses
      • 3.2.1Modern Portuguese
      • 3.2.2Portuguese in diachrony
    • 3.3The position of pronominal subjects of infinitives in Spanish adverbial clauses
      • 3.3.1Modern Peninsular Spanish
      • 3.3.2Spanish in diachrony
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (38)
References
Ambar, M. M. (1994). Aux to COMP and lexical restrictions on verb movement. In G. Cinque, J. Koster, J.-Y. Pollock, L. Rizzi & R. Zanuttini (Eds.), Paths towards universal grammar. Studies in honor of Richard S. Kayne (pp. 1–23). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christen, S. (2001). Genitive positions in Baltic and Finnic languages. In Ö. Dahl & M. Koptjevskaja-Tamm (Eds.), Circum-Baltic languages. Vol. 2: Grammar and typology (pp. 499–520). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Docal, S. (2012). Individualidad. Original by R. G. Ingersoll. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Eide, K. G. (2006). Word order structures and unaccusative verbs in Classical and Modern Portuguese. The reorganisation of information structure. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Prosody, information structure and word order changes in Portuguese. In G. Ferraresi & R. Lühr (Eds.), Diachronic studies on information structure. Language acquisition and change (pp. 87–116). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Postverbal subjects of unaccusative verbs in the history of Portuguese. In M. Bouzouita, I. Sitaridou & E. Pato (Eds.), Studies in historical Ibero-Romance morpho-syntax (pp. 149–171). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (in this volume)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández Lagunilla, M. (1987). Los infinitivos con sujetos léxicos en español. In V. Demonte & M. Fernández Lagunilla, Sintaxis de las lenguas románicas (pp. 125–147). Madrid: El Arquero.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gili Gaya, S. (1985). Curso superior de sintaxis española. Barcelona: Bibliograf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hernanz Carbó, M. L. (1982). El infinitivo en español. Bellaterra: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kenesei, I. (1994). Complementation in Finno-Ugric. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Keniston, H. (1937). The syntax of Castilian prose. The sixteenth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiss, K. E. (1998). Identificational focus versus information focus. Language, 74(2), 245–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
König, E. (2001). Intensifiers and reflexive pronouns. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals. An international handbook (747–760). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kujawski, G. (2012). O escritor cyberpunk brasileiro finaliza sua nova obra Vistarmada . Retrieved from <[URL]>
Ledgeway, A. (2000). A Comparative Syntax of the Dialects of Southern Italy: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lipski, J. M. (1977). Preposed subjects in questions: Some considerations. Hispania, 60(1), 61–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorda Vidal, I-C. (2012). La sombra del tiempo es alargada: exilios españoles en Londres. Fronterad. Revista digital. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Madeira, Ana Maria. 1994. “On the Portuguese inflected infinitive”, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 179–203.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martins, A. M. (2011). Scrambling and information focus in Old and Contemporary Portuguese. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 10, 133–158.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mensching, G. (2000). Infinitive constructions with specified subjects. A syntactic analysis of the Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morales de Walters, A. (1988). Infinitivo con sujeto expreso en el español de Puerto Rico. In R. M. Hammond & M. C. Resnick (Eds.), Studies in Caribbean Spanish dialectology (pp. 85–96). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Otto, R. (1888). Der portugiesische Infinitiv bei Camões. Erlangen: Junge & Sohn.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Posner, R. (1996). The Romance languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raposo, E. (1987). Case theory and Infl-to-Comp: The inflected infinitive in European Portuguese. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 85–109.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rouveret, A. (1980). Sur la notion de proposition finie: Gouvernement et inversion. Langages, 60, 75–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schulte, K. (2007). Prepositional infinitives in Romance: A usage-based approach to syntactic change. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sitaridou, I. (2002). The synchrony and diachrony of Romance infinitives with nominative subjects. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skydsgaard, S. (1977). La combinatoria sintáctica del infinitivo español, Vol. 1. Madrid: Castalia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suñer, M. (1986). Lexical subjects of infinitives in Caribbean Spanish. In O. Jaeggli & C. Silva-Corvalán (Eds.), Studies in Romance linguistics (pp. 189–203). Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torrego, E. (1998). Nominative subjects and pro-drop INFL. Syntax, 1(2), 206–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, R., & Bauman, J. (2018). Allative to purposive grammaticalization: A quantitative story of Spanish para . In M. Bouzouita, I. Sitaridou & E. Pato (Eds.), Studies in historical Ibero-Romance morpho-syntax (pp. 195–221). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (in this volume) Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoon, J. H-S., & Bonet-Farran, N. (1991). The ambivalent nature of Spanish infinitives. In D. Wanner & D. A. Kibbee (Eds.), New analyses in Romance languages: Selected papers from the 18th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Urbana-Champaign, 1988 (pp. 353–379). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corpus
Cervantes, M. de. (1605–1615). El ingenioso hidalgo Don Quijote de la Mancha. F. Rico (Ed.). Madrid: Instituto Cervantes, 1998.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Monterrubio, S. (2011). La granja de la font. Madrid: Visión.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ministério da Ciência e da Tecnologia (MCT) and Público. (2000). Corpus de Extractos de Textos Electrónicos MCT/Público. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Valdés, J. de. (1535). Diálogo de la lengua. J. M. Lope Blanch (Ed.). Madrid: Castalia, 1976.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Villegas, Alonso de. (1580–1603). Fructus sanctorum y quinta parte del Flos sanctorum. J. Aragüés Aldaz (Ed.). València: Universitat de València, 1998.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Rivas, Javier & Esther L. Brown
2021. O infinitivo flexionado en galego: unha análise variacionista baseada na lingua oral. Estudos de Lingüística Galega ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Eide, Kristine Gunn
2018. Postverbal subjects of unaccusative verbs in the history of Portuguese. In Studies in historical Ibero-Romance morpho-syntax [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 16], ► pp. 149 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue