In:Contemporary Trends in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics: Selected papers from the Hispanic Linguistic Symposium 2015
Edited by Jonathan E. MacDonald
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 15] 2018
► pp. 121–142
Chapter 6Are Argentines a-blind?
Acceptability of a-marked inanimate direct objects
Published online: 14 February 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.15.07hof
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.15.07hof
Abstract
I examine syntactic and discursive factors conditioning the variable a-marking of inanimate DOs in Argentine Spanish, using an online questionnaire which includes 16 contextualized discourse items recorded by native Argentines. Argentine respondents (N = 140) evaluated acceptability of the items using a 5-point Likert scale. Linguistic predictors analyzed include: definiteness, mono- vs. ditransitive constructions, and topicality, operationalized in terms of pre-/post-verbal position and referential distance. Mixed-effects analyses in R showed that although participants assigned significantly higher ratings to normative unmarked inanimate DOs than to a-marked ones, a-marking was still widely accepted, with definite DOs, pre-verbal position, and monotransitivity as significant predictors of acceptance. Furthermore, in 10/16 cases, participant ratings showed no significant difference between marked and unmarked DOs, demonstrating that participants are, to an extent, “a-blind” or uninfluenced by marking.
Keywords: DOM, accusative a
, inanimate, Argentine Spanish
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous literature
- 3.Variables
- 4.Research questions and hypotheses
- 5.Methodology
- 5.1Instrument
- 5.2Speakers
- 5.3Participants
- 5.4Data analysis
- 6.Results
- 7.Discussion
- 8.Conclusions
Notes References
References (34)
Aissen, J. (2003). Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21(3), 435–483.
Balasch, S. (2011). Factors determining Spanish differential object marking within its domain of variation. In J. Michnowicz, & R. Dodsworth (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics (pp. 113–124). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Barrenechea, A. M., & Orecchia, T. (1977). La duplicación de objetos directos e indirectos en el español hablado en Buenos Aires. In J. M. Lope Blanch (Ed.), Estudios sobre el español hablado en las principales ciudades de América (pp. 351–381). Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Bentivoglio, P. (1983). Continuity and discontinuity in discourse: A study on Latin American Spoken Spanish. In T. Givón (Ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study (pp. 255–311). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bossong, G. (1985). Empirische Universalienforschung. Differentielle Objektmarkierung in der neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.
Company, C. (2002). Grammaticalization and category weakness. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 201–215). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dumitrescu, D. (1997). El parámetro discursivo en la expresión del objeto directo lexical: español madrileño vs. español porteño. Signo y Seña, 7, 305–354.
Escandell-Vidal, V. (2009). Differential object marking and topicality: The case of Balearic Catalan. Studies in Language, 33(4), 832–884.
Estigarribia, B. (2003). “Did you say clitic doubling?” A structural and functional analysis for Buenos Aires Spanish. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
(2006). Why clitic doubling? A functional analysis for Rioplatense Spanish. In T. Face, & C. Klee (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 8th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 123–136). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Fábregas, A. (2013). Differential object marking in Spanish: State of the art. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 2(2), 1–80.
García García, M. (2005). Differential object marking and informativeness. In K. von Heusinger et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop ‘Specificity and the Evolution/Emergence of Nominal Determination Systems in Romance,’ (pp. 17–31). Konstanz: Universität Konstanz.
(2007). Differential object marking with inanimate objects. In G. Kaiser, & M. Leonetti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop ‘Definiteness, Specificity and Animacy in Ibero-Romance Languages’ (pp. 63–84). Konstanz: Universität Konstanz.
(2014). Differentielle Objektmarkierung bei unbelebten Objekten im Spanischen. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Givón, T. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In T. Givón (Ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study (pp. 1–41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Iemmolo, G. (2011). Towards a typological study of Differential Object Marking and Differential Object Indexation. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Pavia.
Laca, B. (1995 [1987]). Sobre el uso del acusativo preposicional en español. In C. Pensado (Ed.), El complemento directo preposicional (pp. 61–91). Madrid: Visor Libros.
(2002). Gramaticalización y variabilidad- propiedades inherentes y factores contextuales en la evolución del acusativo preposicional en español. In A. Wesch et al. (Eds.), Sprachgeschichte als Varietätengeschichte/Historia de las variedades lingüísticas (pp. 195–203). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: A theory of topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leonetti, M. (2003). Specificity and object marking: The case of Spanish a
. In K. von Heusinger, & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop ‘Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Specificity in Romance Languages’ (pp. 67–101). Konstanz: University of Konstanz.
(2004). Specificity and differential object marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 3, 75–114.
Lizárraga Navarro, G. Z., & Mora-Bustos, A. (2010). Variación en la marcación diferenciada de objeto en español. Forma y Función, 23(1), 9–38.
Melis, C. (1995). El objeto directo personal en El Cantar de Mio Cid. Estudio sintáctico-pragmàtico. In C. Pensado (Ed.), El complemento directo preposicional (pp. 133–163). Madrid: Visor Libros.
Montrul, S. (2013). La marcación diferencial del objeto directo en el español de Argentina: Un estudio experimental. In L. Colantoni, & C. Rodríguez-Louro (Eds.), Perspectivas teóricas y experimentales sobre el español de la Argentina (pp. 207–228). Madrid & Frankfurt: Iberoamericana & Vervuert.
Ocampo, F. (2009). El orden de palabras en el español hablado. La construcción sujeto verbo objeto directo. In M. Veyrat Rigat, & E. Serra Alegre (Eds.), La lingüística como reto epistemológico y como acción social: Estudios dedicados al Profesor Ángel López García con ocasión de su sexagésimo aniversario (pp. 501–511). Madrid: Arco Libros.
Pensado, C. (1985). La creación del objeto directo preposicional y la flexión de los pronombres personales en las lenguas románicas. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, 30(2), 123–58.
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. <[URL]>
Suñer, M. (1988). The role of agreement in clitic doubled constructions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 6(3), 391–434.
Tippets, I. (2011). Differential object marking: Quantitative evidence for underlying hierarchical constraints across Spanish dialects. In L. Ortiz-López (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 13th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 107–117). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Tippets, I., & Schwenter, S. (2007). Relative animacy and differential object marking in Spanish. Paper presented at NWAV 36, Philadelphia, PA.
von Heusinger, K. (2008). Verbal semantics and the diachronic development of DOM in Spanish. Probus, 20, 1–31.
von Heusinger, K., & Kaiser, G. (2003). The interaction of animacy, definiteness, and specificity. In K. von Heusinger, & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop ‘Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Specificity in Romance Languages’ (pp. 41–65). Konstanz: Dept. of Linguistics, Konstanz University.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
de Crignis, Patricia
Hoff, Mark
Wall, Albert, Senta Zeugin, Philipp Obrist, Patrick Santos Rebelo & Johannes Kabatek
Bautista-Maldonado, Salvador & Silvina Montrul
2019. An experimental investigation of differential object marking in Mexican Spanish. Spanish in Context 16:1 ► pp. 22 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
