Cover not available

In:Multidisciplinary Approaches to Bilingualism in the Hispanic and Lusophone World
Edited by Kate Bellamy, Michael W. Child, Paz González, Antje Muntendam and M. Carmen Parafita Couto
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 13] 2017
► pp. 283–311

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 12
Bilingual production of relative clauses in languages with opposite head-complement directionality

 | University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
 | University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
 | University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
Published online: 31 May 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.13.12eze
Abstract
The so-called SR advantage, based on the observation that S(ubject) R(elatives) are easier to acquire, comprehend or process as compared to O(bject) R(elatives) in many Verb-Object languages, contrasts with the pattern attested in some languages with prenominal relative clauses and/or Object-Verb word order. This study analyses the elicited production of relative clauses by four groups of Spanish-Basque bilinguals in their two languages. Results reveal a generally (similar or) higher accuracy in SR than in OR production across groups, regardless of language specificities (VO vs. OV, prenominal vs. postnominal RCs) and participants’ language and/or age profiles. A more detailed analysis of the non-target productions revealed that adult and even six-year-old bilinguals make use of language specific cues to distinguish SRs and ORs in their two languages discarding any crosslinguistic influence in this particular contact situation.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Relative clauses in Spanish and Basque
    • 2.1Spanish relative clauses
    • 2.2Basque relative clauses
    • 2.3Ambiguous relative clauses in Spanish and Basque
    • 2.4Complexity of SRs and ORs
  • 3.The study
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Materials
    • 3.3Procedure
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (42)
References
Arosio, F., Adani, F., & Guasti, M. T. (2009). Grammatical features in the comprehension of Italian relative clauses by children. In J. M. Brucart, A. Gavarró, & J. Solà (Eds.), Merging features: Computation, interpretation, and acquisition (pp. 138–155). Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Artiagoitia, X. (1992). Why Basque doesn’t relativize everything? International Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology, 27, 11–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Basque Government. (2008). EAS Euskal Herriko Hizkuntza-adierazleen Sistema [System of linguistic indicators of Euskal Herria]. <[URL]>
Brucart, J. M. (1994). El funcionamiento sintáctico de los relativos en español. In B. Garza, J. A. Pascual, & A. Alonso Gonzalez (Eds.), II Encuentro de lingüistas y filólogos de España y México: Salamanca 25–30 de noviembre de 1991 (pp. 443–469). Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). La estructura del sintagma nominal: Las oraciones de relativo. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 395–522). Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carreiras, M., Duñabeitia, J. A., Vergara, M., de la Cruz-Pavía, I., & Laka, I. (2010). Subject relative clauses are not universally easier to process: Evidence from Basque. Cognition, 115, 57–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De la Cruz-Pavía, I., Elordieta, G., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Laka, I. (2015). On the role of frequency-based cues in the segmentation strategies of adult OV/VO. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18, 225–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Rijk, R. P. G. (1972). Studies in Basque syntax: Relative clauses. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ezeizabarrena, M. J. (2012a). Children do not substitute object relatives with subject relatives in every romance language: the case of Spanish. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, LVII(2), 161–181.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012b). The (in)consistent ergative marking in early Basque: L1 vs. child L2. Lingua, 122, 303–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández Soriano, O. (1999). El pronombre personal: formas y distribución. Pronombres átonos y tónicos. In V. Demonte & I. Bosque (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 1209–1274). Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The Cumulative-Enhancement Model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. The International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(1), 3–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedmann, N. (2010). The production of relative clauses by 5-year-olds across multiple languages. They prefer to be the children who do not produce object relatives. Paper presented at the COST-A33 final conference: Let the children speak: learning of critical language skills across 28 languages, London, 22–24 January.
Friedmann, N., Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (2009). Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua, 119(1), 67–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedmann, N., & Szterman, R. (2006). Syntactic movement in orally-trained children with hearing impairment. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11, 56–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibson, E., & Wu, H.-H. I. (2013). Processing Chinese relative clauses in context. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(1–2), 125–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grillo, N. (2009). Generalized minimality: Feature impoverishment and comprehension deficits in agrammatism. Lingua, 119, 1426–1443. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutierrez-Mangado, M. J. (2011). Children’s comprehension of relative clauses in an ergative language: The case of Basque. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics, 18(3), 176–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Ergative case in the production and comprehension of relative clauses in Basque. Poster presented at the International Symposium of Psycholinguistics, Tenerife.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutierrez-Mangado, M. J., & Ezeizabarrena, M. J. (2012). Asymmetry in child comprehension and production of Basque subject and object relative clauses. In A. Biller, E. Chung, & A. Kimball (Eds.), BUCLD 36 Online Proceedings Supplement, <[URL]>.
Hartsuiker, R. J., Pickering, M. J., & Veltkamp, E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Psychological Science, 15(6), 409–414. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kanno, K. (2007). Factors affecting the processing of Japanese relative clauses by L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 197–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, E.L., & Comrie, B. (1997). Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), 63–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kidd, E., Chan, A., & Chiu, J. (2015). Cross-linguistic influence in simultaneous Cantonese-English bilingual children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(03), 438–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labelle, M. (1990). Predication, wh-movement, and the development of relative clauses. Language Acquisition, 1, 95–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laka, I., Erdocia, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Molinaro, N., & Carreiras, M. (2011). Complex syntactic processing in very proficient non-natives elicits N400. Paper presented at the Cognitive Neuroscience Society Meeting CNS, San Francisco.
Mak, W. M., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H. (2002). The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 50–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (2007). The weaker language in early child bilingualism: Acquiring a first language as a second language? Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 495–514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munarriz, A. (2017). The influence of structural distance in cross-linguistic transfer: A case study on Spanish-Basque bilingual aphasia. In K. Bellamy, M. Child, P. González, A. G. Muntendam, & M.C. Parafita Couto (Eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to bilingualism in the Hispanic and Lusophone world (pp. 233–258). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munarriz, A., Ezeizabarrena, M. J., & Gutierrez-Mangado, M. J. (2016). Differential and selective morpho-syntactic impairment in Spanish-Basque bilingual aphasia Bilingualism, Language and Cognition 19, 4, 810–833. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Novogrodsky, R., & Friedmann, N. (2006). The production of relative clauses in syntactic SLI: A window to the nature of the impairment. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, 8(4), 364–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Grady, W., Lee, M., & Choo, M. (2003). A subject-object asymmetry in the acquisition of relative clauses in Korean as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 433–448.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ozeki, H., & Shirai, Y. (2007). The consequence of variation in the acquisition of relative clauses: An analysis of longitudinal production data from five Japanese children. In Y. Matsumoto, D. Y. Oshima, O. R. Robinson, & P. Sells (Eds.), Diversity in languages: Perspectives and implications. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, M. T. (1995). Resumptives in acquisition. Language Acquisition, 4(1–2), 105–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sainzmaza-Lecanda, L. & Schwenter, S. A. (2017). Null objects with and without bilingualism in the Portuguese- and Spanish-speaking world. In K. Bellamy, M. Child, P. González, A. G. Muntendam, & M.C. Parafita Couto (Eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to bilingualism in the Hispanic and Lusophone world. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soziolinguistika Klusterra. (2014). Datu soziolinguistikoen bilduma (1986–2011): Oiartzun ‘Sociolinguistic Data Collection (1986–2011): Oiartzun. <[URL]>
Su, Y.C. (2004). Relatives in Mandarin children. Paper presented at Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition in North America. University of Hawai’i Manoa.
Su, Y. C., Lee, S. E., & Chung, Y. M. (2007). Asyntactic thematic role assignment by Mandarin aphasics: A test of the Trace-Deletion Hypothesis and the Double Dependency Hypothesis. Brain and Language, 101(1), 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torrego, E. (1984). On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 103–129.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weber-Fox, C. M., & Neville, H. J. (1996). Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of cognitive Neuroscience, 8(3), 231–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yip, V., & Matthews, S. (2007). Relative clauses in Cantonese-English bilingual children. Typological challenges and processing motivations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 277–300. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Ramos Feijoo, Jon & María del Pilar García Mayo
2023. The acquisition of relative clauses by Spanish-Basque learners of L3 English: does dominance play a role?. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:3 ► pp. 1051 ff. DOI logo
Stern, Michael C., LeeAnn Stover, Ernesto Guerra & Gita Martohardjono
2021. Syntactic and Semantic Influences on the Time Course of Relative Clause Processing: The Role of Language Dominance. Brain Sciences 11:8 ► pp. 989 ff. DOI logo
Stern, Michael C., Christen N. Madsen, LeeAnn M. Stover, Cass Lowry & Gita Martohardjono
2019. Language history attenuates syntactic prediction in L1 processing. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 3:2 ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Munarriz, Amaia
2017. The influence of structural distance in cross-linguistic transfer. In Multidisciplinary approaches to bilingualism in the Hispanic and Lusophone world [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 13], ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Muysken, Pieter
2017. The global and the local. In Multidisciplinary approaches to bilingualism in the Hispanic and Lusophone world [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 13], ► pp. 313 ff. DOI logo
Vergara, Daniel & Luis López
2017. Obliteration after Vocabulary Insertion. In Multidisciplinary approaches to bilingualism in the Hispanic and Lusophone world [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 13], ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue