Cover not available

In:Forms of Address in the Spanish of the Americas
Edited by María Irene Moyna and Susana Rivera-Mills
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 10] 2016
► pp. 1–12

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Introduction

Addressing the research questions

ORCiD logo with link | Texas A & M University
Published online: 25 August 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.10.01moy
References (63)
References
Albor, H.R. (2001). Su merced is growing old. Hisperia. Anuario de Filología Hispánica, 4, 5-14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arrizabalaga, C. (2001). Noticias de la desaparición del voseo en la costa norte del Perú. Lingüística Española Actual, 23(2), 257-74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bello, A. (1914). Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos (17th ed.). Paris: Roger & Chernoviz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benavides, C. (2003). La distribución del voseo en Hispanoamérica. Hispania, 86(3), 612-623. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertolotti, V. (2007). La cuestión de vuestro/a(s): Vitalidad medieval y clásica en el español del Uruguay. Estudios de Lingüística Hispánica, 1(1), 17-42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertolotti, V., & Coll, M. (2003). A synchronical and historical view of the tú/vos option in the Spanish of Montevideo. In S. Montrul & F. Ordóñez (Eds.), Linguistic theory and language development in Hispanic languages: Papers from the 5th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium and the 4th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese (pp. 1-12). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.
Bishop, K., & Michnowicz, J. (2010). Forms of address in Chilean Spanish. Hispania, 93(3), 413-429.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blanco Botta, I. (1982). El voseo en Cuba: Estudio socio-lingüístico de una zona de la isla. Beiträge zur Romanischen Philologie, 21, 291-304.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blas Arroyo, J.L. (1994). De nuevo sobre el poder y la solidaridad. Apuntes para un análisis interaccional de la alternancia tú/usted. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 42(2), 385-414.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. American Anthropologist, 4(6), 24-39.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calderón Campos, M., & Medina Morales, F. (2010). Historia y situación actual de los pronombres de tratamiento en el español peninsular. In M. Hummel, B. Kluge, & M.E. Vázquez Laslop (Eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico (pp. 195-222). Mexico City/Graz: El Colegio de México/Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capdevila, A. (1954). Babel y el castellano. Buenos Aires: Losada.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Castro-Mitchell, A.L. (1996). ¿Usted porque lo conozco o porque lo quiero mucho?: The semantic functions of “usted” in Honduran Spanish . (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clyne, M., Norrby, C. & Warren, J. (2009). Language and human relations: Style of address in contemporary languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clyne, M. (1992). Pluricentric languages: Differing norms in different nations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donni de Mirande, N.E. (1992). El sistema verbal en el español de la Argentina: Rasgos de unidad y de diferenciación dialectal. Revista de Filología Española, 72(3/4), 654-670. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fontanella de Weinberg, M.B. (1971). El voseo en Buenos Aires en las primeras décadas del siglo XIX. Thesaurus, 26(3), 495-514.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1976). Analogía y confluencia paradigmática en formas verbales de voseo. Thesaurus 31(2), 249-272.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1977). La constitución del paradigma pronominal del voseo. Thesaurus, 32(2), 227-241.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1989). Avances y rectificaciones en el estudio del voseo americano. Thesaurus, 44(1-3), 521-543.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1992). Fusión de paradigmas, variación y cambio lingüístico. El caso del voseo. In M. Vaquero & A. Morales (Eds.), Homenaje a Humberto López Morales (pp. 185-194). Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1993). Usos americanos y peninsulares de segunda persona singular. In A.M. Barrenechea, L. Martínez Cuitiño, & E. Lois (Eds.), Actas del III Congreso Argentino de Hispanistas (pp. 144-153). Buenos Aires: Asociación Argentina de Hispanistas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1999). Sistemas pronominales de tratamiento usados en el mundo hispánico. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 1401-25). Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granda, G. de (1978). Las formas verbales diptongadas en el voseo hispanoamericano. Una interpretación sociohistórica de datos dialectales. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica, 27, 80-92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2004). Una forma deferencial en el español peruano: Su Merced. Lexis 28(1-2), 447-459Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). Hacia la diacronía de una forma de tratamiento en el español: su merced. Lexis 31(1-2), 165-175.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helmbrecht, J. (2013). Politeness distinctions in pronouns. In M.S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at <[URL]> (accessed on 24 May 2015).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ide, S. 1989. Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua, Journal of Cross Cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 8, 223-248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jang Son, J. (2010). Fórmulas de tratamiento pronominales en los jóvenes universitarios de Medellín (Colombia) desde la óptica sociopragmática: estrato socioeconómico y sexo. Íkala, 15(26), 43-116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joseph, J.E. (1987). Subject relevance and deferential address in the Indo-European languages. Lingua, 73, 259-277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, A.H. & Taavitsainen, I. (2003). Introduction. In I. Taavitsainen & A.H. Jucker (Eds.), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems (pp. 1-25). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kany, C.E. (1969). Sintaxis hispanoamericana (transl. by M. Blanco Álvarez). Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kühl de Mones, U. (1981). Actitudes lingüísticas frente al español de Montevideo (Uruguay). Revista de la Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias. Serie Lingüística, 1(3), 37-60.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lapesa, R. (1970a). Las formas verbales de segunda persona y los orígenes del ‘voseo’. In C.H. Magis (Ed.), Actas del Tercer Congreso Internacional de Hispanistas (pp. 519-531). Mexico/City: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1970b). Personas gramaticales y tratamientos en español. Revista de la Universidad de Madrid, 19, 141-167.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1980). Historia de la lengua española. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lipski, J. (1985). The Spanish of Equatorial Guinea. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1994). Latin American Spanish. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2002). The role of the city in the formation of Spanish American dialect zones. Arachne@Rutgers, 2(1). Available online at <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. (1988). Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 403-426. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Medina López, J. (1989-90). Formas de tratamiento en una comunidad juvenil. Revista de Filología de la Universidad de la Laguna, 8-9, 249-258.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malinowski, A. (1983). The pronouns of address in contemporary Judeo-Spanish. Romance Philology, 37(1), 20-35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murillo Rojas, M. (1995). Formas pronominales de tratamiento en niños preescolares costarricenses: conversaciones espontáneas. Revista Educación, 19(1), 17-27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Páez Urdaneta, I. (1981). Historia y geografía hispanoamericana del voseo. Caracas: La Casa de Bello.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penny, R. (2000). Variation and change in Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2002). A history of the Spanish language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinkerton, A. (1986). Observations on the tú/vos option in Guatemalan Ladino Spanish. Hispania, 69(3), 690-698. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quilis, A. (2001). Notas gramaticales sobre la lengua española de Bolivia. Lexis, 25(1-2), 201-221.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quilis, A., & Graell Stanziola, M. (1989). El voseo en Panamá. Revista de Filología Española, 69, 173-178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Resnick, M. (1975). Phonological variants and dialect identification in Latin American Spanish. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ricci, J., & Malán de Ricci, I. (1977). La rotura del equilibrio vos(tú)-usted en el español del Río de la Plata. Foro Literario (Montevideo), 1, 16-18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rona, J.P. (1964). El problema de la división del español americano en zonas dialectales. In Presente y futuro de la lengua española, Vol. 1 (pp. 215-226). Madrid: OFINES.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1967). Geografía y morfología del voseo. Porto Alegre: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torrejón, A. (1986). Acerca del voseo culto de Chile. Hispania, 69(3), 677-683. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1991). Fórmulas de tratamiento de segunda persona singular en el español de Chile. Hispania, 74(4), 1068-1076. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). El voseo en Chile: Una aproximación diacrónica. In M. Hummel, B. Kluge, & M.E. Vázquez Laslop (Eds.), Formas y fórmulas de tratamiento en el mundo hispánico (pp. 413-427). Mexico City/Graz: El Colegio de México/Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uber, D.R. (1985). The dual function of usted: Forms of address in Bogotá, Colombia. Hispania, 62(2), 388-392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weyers, J. (2009). The impending demise of tú in Montevideo, Uruguay. Hispania, 92(4), 829-839.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woods, M.R., & Rivera-Mills, S.V. (2010). Transnacionalismo del voseante: salvadoreños y hondureños en los Estados Unidos. Lengua y Migración, 2(1), 97-112.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2012). El tú como “mask”: Voseo and Salvadoran and Honduran identity in the United States. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 5(1), 191-216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zamora, J.C., & Guitart, J. (1988). Dialectología hispanoamericana (2nd ed.). Salamanca: Alm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Zwisler, Joshua James
2025. Tú, Usted e Ibagué: Las formas de tratamiento en una ciudad regional. Lenguaje 53:2 ► pp. e20514772 ff. DOI logo
Vaughn, Stevi, Rebecca Ronquest & Jim Michnowicz
2024. Ven, Vení, Venga. In Recent developments in Hispanic linguistics [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 41], ► pp. 172 ff. DOI logo
Guarin, Daniel & Larissa Oliveira Cardoso
2023. A Virtual Linguistic Landscape Analysis of Higher Education Institutions and Their Use of Pronouns of Address in the Hispanic and Lusophone World. In Transformation of Higher Education Through Institutional Online Spaces [Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development, ], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Guarin, Daniel
2022. El uso de pronombres de tratamiento en el departamento del Quindío (Colombia). Miradas 17:2 ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Guarin, Daniel
2024. Pronominal address in the linguistic landscape of Hispanic Philadelphia. Language, Culture and Society 6:2 ► pp. 250 ff. DOI logo
García-Godoy, María-Teresa & Marcela Rivandeira-Valenzuela
2021. Presentación. Tratamientos nominales en la historia de la lengua española. Rilce. Revista de Filología Hispánica 37:1 ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Foster, Daniel, Suzanne Aalberse & Wessel Stoop
2019. Examining Twitter as a source for address research using Colombian Spanish. In It’s not all about you [Topics in Address Research, 1], ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue