Cover not available

Article published In: Information Design Journal
Vol. 25:2 (2019) ► pp.125–156

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Information design for bowel cancer detection

The impact of using information visualisation to help patients prepare for colonoscopy screening

 | University of Leeds
 | Hull York Medical School
Published online: 7 July 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.25.2.01lon
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is one of the most commonly occurring cancers in the world, and colonoscopy is the most sensitive procedure to detect it. Colonoscopy success depends on the quality of bowel preparation, yet the way information is designed and communicated to patients does not meet their needs. By considering how information is conveyed through three different outputs (booklet, motion graphics and app), this study investigates the advantages of using visualised information when communicating bowel preparation instructions for colonoscopy screening. A user-centered multiple-methods approach was followed and results show how user performance benefits from the use of information visualisation. A set of guidelines is given to inform the development of bowel preparation instructions and other similar health related communications.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Context
    • 1.2Aim and research questions
  • 2.Identification of problems and needs
    • 2.1Survey of existing booklets
    • 2.2Focus group and questionnaire with former patients
      • 2.2.1Focus group
      • 2.2.2Online questionnaire with former patients
  • 3.Design development, testing and iteration
    • 3.1Booklet development, testing and iteration
    • 3.2Motion graphics development, testing and iteration
    • 3.3App development, testing and iteration
  • 4.Evaluation and validation
    • 4.1Booklet
      • 4.1.1Participants
      • 4.1.2Procedure and materials
    • 4.2Motion graphics
      • 4.2.1Participants
      • 4.2.2Procedure and materials
    • 4.3App
      • 4.3.1Participants
      • 4.3.2Procedure and materials
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Comprehension accuracy (performance)
    • 5.2Time (performance)
    • 5.3Opinion
  • 6.Discussion and conclusion
  • 7.Practical implications and guidelines
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (39)
References
Cancer Research UK. (2014). Bowel cancer survival statistics. [Online]. Retrieved from [URL]
Cohen, L. B. (2014). Maximizing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: The patient component. Gastroenterology & Endoscopy News, April: 16–17.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harewood, G. C., Sharma, V. K., & de Garmo, P. (2003). Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc, 58(1), 76–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haute Autorité de Santé. (2008). How to produce an information brochure for patients and users of the healthcare system [Online]. Retrieved from [URL]
Heynsbergh, N., Heckel, L., Botti, M., Chul, S., & Livingston, P. M. (2019). Development of a smartphone app for informal carers of people with cancer: Processes and learnings. JMIR Form Res, 3(2). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 722–738. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Honka, A., Kaipainen, K., Hietala, H., & Saranummi, N. (2011). Rethinking health: ICT-enabled services to empower people to manage their health. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng, 41, 119–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Houts, P. S., Doak, C. C., Doak, L. G., & Loscalzo, M. J. (2006). The role of pictures in improving health communication: A review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns, 61(2), 173–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, D. A., Barkun, A. N., Cohen, L. B., Dominitz, J. A., Kaltenbach, T., Martel, M., … Rex, D. K. (2014). Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: Recommendations from the U.S. multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc, 80(4), 543–562. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leaper, M., Johnston, M. J., Barclay, M., Dobbs, B. R., & Frizelle, F. A. (2004). Reasons for failure to diagnose colorectal carcinoma at colonoscopy. Endoscopy, 36(6), 499–503. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lonsdale, M. dos S. (2007). Does typographic design of examination materials affect performance? Information Design Journal, 15(2), 114–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). The typographic features of text and how they contribute to the legibility of academic reading materials: An empirical study. Visible Language, 50(1), 79–111.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lonsdale, M. dos S., Dyson, M. C., & Reynolds, L. (2006). Reading in examination-type situations: The effects of text layout on performance. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(4), 433–453. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLachlan, S. A., Clements, A., Austoker, J. (2012). Patients – experiences and reported barriers to colonoscopy in the screening context: A systematic review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns, 86(2), 137–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MDedge. (2013). DDW13: App helps patients prepare for colonoscopy [Online]. Retrieved from [URL]
Moran, K. (2016). Using the Microsoft desirability toolkit to test visual appeal [Online]. Retrieved from [URL]
nhs.uk. (2018). Bowel cancer [Online]. Retrieved from [URL]
Pak, R., & McLaughlin, A. (2011). Designing displays for older adults. London: Taylor & Francis (CRC Press).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parker, D. (1992). Human responses to colonoscopy. Society of Gastroenterologists Nurses and Associates, December, 107–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patrick, K., Griswold, W. G., Raab, F., & Intille, S. S. (2008). Health and the mobile phone. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2), 177–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petterson, R. (2015). Information design 5: Cognition. Tullinge: Institute for Infology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rex, D. K., Petrini, J. L., Baron, T. H., Chak, A., Cohen, J., Deal, S. E., … Pike, I. M. (2006). Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc, 63(4), S16–S28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ristvedt, S. L., McFarland, E. G., Weinstock, L. B., & Thyssen, E. P. (2003). Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol, 98(3), 578–585. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robertson, D. J., Greenberg, E. R., Beach, M., Sandler, R. S., Ahnen, D., Haile, R. W., … Baron, J. A. (2005). Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology, 129(1), 34–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero, R. V., & Mahadeva, S. (2013). Factors influencing quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc, 5(2), 39–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, G., Krygier, D., Enns, R. A., Singham, J., Wiesinger, H., & Bressler, B. (2010). The impact of patient education on the quality of inpatient bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol, 24(9), 543–546. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sidhu, S., Geraghty, J., Karpha, I., Wark, L., Logan, C., & Sarkar, S. (2011). Outcomes following an initial unsuccessful colonoscopy: A 5-year complete audit of teaching hospital colonoscopy practice. Presented at 2011 British Society of Gastroenterology Annual General Meeting; March 14–17, 2011; Birmingham, United Kingdom. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, S. G., von Wagner, C., McGregor, L. M., Curtis, L. M., Wilson, E. A., Serper, M., & Wolf, M. S. (2012). The Influence of health literacy on comprehension of a colonoscopy preparation information leaflet. Dis Colon Rectum, 55(10), 1074–1080. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spiegel, B. M., Talley, J., Shekelle, P., Agarwal, N., Snyder, B., Bolus, R., … Cohen, H. (2011). Development and validation of a novel patient educational booklet to enhance colonoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol, 106(5), 875–883. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strizver, I. (2014). Type rules! The designer’s guide to professional typography (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tae, J. W., Lee, J. C., Hong, S. J., Han, J. P., Lee, Y. H., Chung, J. H., …Lee, M. S. (2012). Impact of patient education with cartoon visual aids on the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc, 76(4), 804–811. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13(2), 127–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Um, E. R., Plass, J. L., Hayward, E. O., & Homer, B. D. (2012). Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 485–498. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voiosu, A., Tanţău, A., Garbulet, C., Tanţău, M., Mateescu, B., Băicuş, C., … Voiosu, T. (2013). Factors affecting colonoscopy comfort and compliance: A questionnaire based multicenter study. Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine, 52(3), 151–157.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiana, W., Barliana, M., & Riyanto, A. (2018). The effectiveness of using interactive multimedia based on motion graphic in concept mastering enhancement and fashion designing skill in digital format. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(2), 4–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolf, M. S., Curtis, L. M., Waite, K., Bailey, S. C., Hedlund, L. A., Davis, T. C., … Wood, A. J. J. (2011). Helping patients simplify and safely use complex prescription regimens. Arch Intern Med, 171(4), 300–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolfson, S., & Case, G. (2000). The effects of sound and color on responses to a computer game. Interacting with Computers, 13(2), 183–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
World Cancer Research Fund. (2019). Colorectal cancer statistics. Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide [Online]. Retrieved from [URL]
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Guerra, Diogo
2025. What type of medical illustrations best improve understanding of scientific content? A systematic review. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine 48:2 ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Baxter, Matthew & Maria dos Santos Lonsdale
2023. Improving the design of public health infographics using a motion graphic educational resource to enhance design principle application. Information Design Journal 28:2 ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Lonsdale, Maria dos Santos, Matthew Baxter, Qinxin Yao, Luwen Yu & Stephen J. Chapman
2023. Testing the effectiveness of a supportive digital information tool for patients recovering from bowel surgery, their surgeons and nurses. Information Design Journal 28:3 ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Walker, Sue, Manjula Halai, Rachel Warner & Josefina Bravo
2021. Beat Bad Microbes. Information Design Journal 26:1 ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue