Article published In: Information Visualization
Edited by Marian Dörk and Isabel Meirelles
[Information Design Journal 25:1] 2019
► pp. 101–109
Pragmatic evaluation of The BMJ’s visual abstracts
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 16 March 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.25.1.08sta
https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.25.1.08sta
Abstract
The British Medical Journal has recently started making visual abstracts to summarise published research studies. These 1024 × 1024 px images give a quick overview of a trial’s participants, design, and key findings. These visual abstracts are designed to help busy health professionals and researchers get a quick overview of newly published research. The present article describes simple pragmatic evaluations of these visual abstracts: analysis of social media stats and an opportunistic reader survey. Our goals were to identify how useful our readers found this new visual format, and whether there were any improvements we could make. The social media stats were initially very promising. Longer term performance over several visual abstracts, however, was not as strong, suggesting a possible halo effect provided by the novelty of a new presentation format. The survey proved to be a quick and valuable way of getting feedback on the design of the initial template, and resulted in several design adjustments.
Keywords: visual abstracts, data visualisation, health, medicine, graphic design, publishing, science, evaluation, social media
Article outline
- 1.Background
- 2.Methods
- 3.Problem
- 3.1Social media performance
- 4.User survey
- 5.Solutions
- 6.Conclusions
- 7.Addendum: Post-Information+ redesign
References
References (10)
Amrhein, V., Greenland, S., & McShane, B. (2019). Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature. Retrieved from [URL]
Cheng, K., Chen, Y., Larson, K., & Rolandi, M. (2017). Proving the value of visual design in scientific communication. Information Design Journal, 23(1), 80–95.
Cooper, B. B. (2013). How Twitter’s expanded images increase clicks, retweets and favorites. Retrieved from [URL]
Hopewell, S., Clarke, M., Moher, D., Wager, E., Middleton, P., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., the CONSORT Group (2008). CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts. Lancet, 371(9609):281–283. Retrieved from [URL]
Ibrahim, A. M., Lillemoe, K. D., Klingensmith, M. E., and Dimick, J. B. (2017). Visual abstracts to disseminate research on social media: A prospective, case-control crossover study. Annals of Surgery, 266(6), e46–e48.
Pferschy-Wenzig, E-M., Pferschy, U., Wang, D., Mocan, A., & Atanasov, A. G. (2016). Does a graphical abstract bring more visibility to your paper? Molecules, 21(9), 1247.
Pinantoan, A. (2015). How to massively boost your blog traffic with these 5 awesome image stats. Retrieved from [URL]
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Wolfe, Joanna, Juliann Reineke & Jennifer Lott
Gilling, Russyl, Marissa Scandlyn & Blair Hesp
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.