Article published In: Information Design Journal
Vol. 29:3 (2024) ► pp.240–263
Exploring the impact of map visualization features to improve campus wayfinding efficiency through user-centered design methods
Published online: 12 September 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.24013.yan
https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.24013.yan
Abstract
Digital maps are essential tools for modern wayfinding, often relying on live GPS location features for successful use. However, complex urban environments can make it difficult for users to spatially locate themselves and navigate areas such as building entrances and vertical pathways. This investigation used a campus environment as a case study to examine the impact of visualized map information that is often overlooked in current digital maps. A multi-stage user-centered design process was employed to develop and test a redesigned map. Results show that the implementation of additional map visualization design practices significantly improves navigation performance.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Background
- 1.2Research aim and objectives
- Aim
- Objectives
- 1.3Research overview
- 1.4Ethics statement
- 2.User needs and design problems
- 2.1Literature review process
- 2.2Literature review — Map design theories
- 2.3Defining user needs — Questionnaire
- 2.4Problem identification — Usability testing of existing digital maps
- Environmental complexity
- Map navigation efficiency
- 3.Design development
- 3.1Prototype design
- Spatial information
- Color usage
- Additional information
- 3.1Prototype design
- 4.Design testing
- 4.1Participant recruitment
- 4.2Test process
- 5.Analysis and results
- 5.1Results of A/B testing
- 5.2Results of observations
- Open spaces
- The accessible route is a passage or a path difficult to identify
- 5.3Interview results
- Basic information
- Additional map visualization features
- 6.Discussion
- 6.1Major findings and contributions to knowledge
- Using design theories and principles to evaluate the legibility of campus digital maps
- Using user-centered methods in information design research
- Making A/B testing results more detailed and objective through qualitative data analysis
- Enhancing map usage efficiency through key visual information
- 6.2Existing research and limitations
- 6.1Major findings and contributions to knowledge
- 7.Conclusion and future work
References
References (48)
Allen, G. L. (1999). Spatial abilities, cognitive maps, and wayfinding: Bases for individual differences in spatial cognition and behavior. Wayfinding behavior, 46–80.
Arthurs, L. A., Baumann, S. P., Rice, J. M., & Litton, S. D. (2023). The development of individuals’ map-reading skill: what research and theory tell us. International Journal of Cartography, 9(1), 3–28.
Atteneder, H., Kühne, O., & Sedelmeier, T. (2025). Cartographic Coding. In Maps as Media Constructs: Exploring Theory, Practice, Critique, and Neopragmatism (pp. 37–47). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Basri, S. N. A., Ahmad, F., Abidin, N. I. A., Baba, I., Harun, H., Hamid, N. H. A., & Kamaruzaman, M. (2020). Digital campus. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 9(2), 382–389.
Bishop, B. W. (2011). Location-based questions and local knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(8), 1594–1603.
Blair, J., & Conrad, F. G. (2011). Sample size for cognitive interview pretesting. Public opinion quarterly, 75(4), 636–658.
Calori, C., & Vanden-Eynden, D. (2015). Signage and wayfinding design: a complete guide to creating environmental graphic design systems. John Wiley & Sons.
Cartwright, W. (2015). Rethinking the definition of the word ‘map’: an evaluation of Beck’s representation of the London Underground through a qualitative expert survey. International Journal of Digital Earth, 8(7), 522–537.
Darken, R. P., & Peterson, B. (2002). Spatial orientation, wayfinding, and representation. In Handbook of virtual environments (pp. 533–558). CRC Press.
Davidson, B. D. (2014). Cartographic design for mobile devices: A case study using the UW-Madison interactive campus map (Doctoral dissertation).
Fabrikant, S. I., Hespanha, S. R., & Hegarty, M. (2010). Cognitively inspired and perceptually salient graphic displays for efficient spatial inference making. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100(1), 13–29.
Gibson, D. (2009). The wayfinding handbook: Information design for public places. Princeton Architectural Press.
Güneş, E. (2018). Evaluating the Influence of Environmental Design Elements on the Legibility of a Shopping Mall. Online Journal of Art & Design, 6(5).
Harding, J. R. (2011). Wayfinding and signing guidelines for airport terminals and landside (Vol. 521). Transportation Research Board.
Harrie, L., Stigmar, H., & Djordjevic, M. (2015). Analytical estimation of map readability. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4(2), 418–446.
ICA (International Cartographic Association) (2003). A Strategic Plan of the International Cartographic Association, 2003–2011 — Revised Version (16p). Durban: International Cartographic Association.
Iftikhar, H., Asghar, S., & Luximon, Y. (2020). The efficacy of campus wayfinding signage: a comparative study from Hong Kong and Pakistan. Facilities, 38(11/12), 871–892.
Iftikhar, H., & Luximon, Y. (2022). The syntheses of static and mobile wayfinding information: an empirical study of wayfinding preferences and behaviour in complex environments. Facilities, 40(7/8), 452–474.
(2023). Wayfinding information syntheses: A study of wayfinding efficiency and behavior in complex outdoor institutional environment. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 16(2), 250–267.
Ishikawa, T., Fujiwara, H., Imai, O., & Okabe, A. (2008). Wayfinding with a GPS-based mobile navigation system: A comparison with maps and direct experience. Journal of environmental psychology, 28(1), 74–82.
Justová, P., & Cajthaml, J. (2023). Cartographic Design and Processing of Originally Printed Historical Maps for Their Presentation on the Web. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(6), 230.
Kanakri, S., Schott, M., Mitchell, A., Mohammad, H., Etters, M., & Palme, N. (2016). Wayfinding systems in educational environments. Environment and Ecology Research, 4(5), 251–256.
Kent, A., & Vujakovic, P. (Eds.) (2018). The Routledge handbook of mapping and cartography. Routledge.
Khazravi, A., & Karimipour, F. (2012). Cognitive readability enhancing of cartographic maps for pedestrian navigation. International Journal of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, 1(3), 11–17.
Lapaine, M., Midtbø, T., Gartner, G., Bandrova, T., Wang, T., & Shen, J. (2021). Definition of the Map. Advances in Cartography and GIScience of the ICA, 31, 1–6.
Madlenak, R., Chinoracky, R., Stalmasekova, N., & Madlenakova, L. (2023). Investigating the effect of outdoor advertising on consumer decisions: an eye-tracking and A/B testing study of car drivers’ perception. Applied sciences, 13(11), 6808.
Montello, D. R. 2002. Cognitive Map-Design Research in the Twentieth Century: Theoretical and Empirical Approaches. Cartography and geographic information science. 29(3), pp.283–304.
Mantoro, T., Saharudin, S. A., & Selamat, S. (2009, December). 3D interactive mobile navigator structure and 2D map in campus environment using GPS. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia (pp. 401–405).
Mocnik, F. B. (2023). Why we can read maps. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 50(1), 1–19.
O’Grady, J. V., & O’Grady, K. V. (2017). A designer’s research manual: succeed in design by knowing your clients + understanding what they really need. 2nd ed. Beverly, MA: Rockport.
Roefs, F., & Mijksenar, P. (2017). Designing for wayfinding. Guidelines for designers and a case study of Amsterdam Airport Schiphol. Information Design. Research and Practice, 527–540.
Roth, R. E., Van Den Hoek, J., Woodruff, A., Erkenswick, A., McGlynn, E., & Przybylowski, J. (2009). The 21st century campus map: Mapping the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Journal of Maps, 5(1), 1–8.
Sadahiro, Y., Tanabe, T., Pierre, M., & Fujii, K. (2015). Computer-aided design of bus route maps. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 43(4), 361–376.
Santee, J. (2022). Cartographic composition across the curriculum: Promoting cartographic literacy using maps as multimodal texts. Prompt: A Journal of Academic Writing Assignments, 6(2).
Shamsuddin, N. A. A., Din, S. C., Saruwono, M., & Ahmad, M. (2022). A Review on Wayfinding Information in Complex Environment. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 7(SI7), 129–134.
Tomitsch, M., & Wrigley, C. (2018). Design. think. make. break. repeat. A handbook of methods. BIS publishers.
Vandenberg, A. E., Hunter, R. H., Anderson, L. A., Bryant, L. L., Hooker, S. P., & Satariano, W. A. (2016). Walking and walkability: is wayfinding a missing link? Implications for public health practice. Journal of physical activity and health, 13(2), 189–197.
Vilar, E., Rebelo, F., Noriega, P., Teles, J., & Mayhorn, C. (2015). Signage versus environmental affordances: is the explicit information strong enough to guide human behavior during a wayfinding task?. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 25(4), 439–452.
Viviani, S., Brischetto, A., Busciantella-Ricci, D., & Rinaldi, A. (2024). Design for inclusion in maps design, for optimizing data usability and readability. The case study of two Healthy Maps. AHFE INTERNATIONAL, 109–119.
Wu, F., Clarke, D., Jiang, J., Baba, A., & Buford, S. (2016). The digital age of campus maps on mobile devices. Journal of Computer and Communications, 4(07), 22.
Wu, A., Zhang, X., & Zhang, W. (2008, September). GPS secure against getting lost, or more danger?. In 2008 International Conference on Cyberworlds (pp. 501–505). IEEE.
Xie, H., Filippidis, L., Galea, E. R., Blackshields, D., & Lawrence, P. J. (2012). Experimental analysis of the effectiveness of emergency signage and its implementation in evacuation simulation. Fire and Materials, 36(5–6), 367–382.
