Article published In: Information Visualization
Edited by Isabel Meirelles, Marian Dörk and Yanni Loukissas
[Information Design Journal 27:1] 2022
► pp. 64–75
Seeing what is not shown
Combining visualization critique and design to surface the limitations in data
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 7 November 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.22006.hen
https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.22006.hen
Abstract
Critical studies of data visualization often highlight how the reductive nature of visualization methods excludes
data limitations and qualities that are crucial to understanding those data. This case study explores how a data visualization
could express contingent, situated, and contextual facets of data. We examine how such data limitations might be surfaced and
represented within visualizations through an interplay between the critique of an existing data visualization and the development
of alternative designs. Based on a case study of urban tree data, we interrogate data limitations in relation to four different
types of missingness: Incompleteness, Emptiness, Absence, and Nothingness. Our study enables reflections on how data limitations
can be investigated using visualizations and considers the development of a critical visualization practice.
Keywords: critical visualization, critique, urban data, visualization design, data studies
Article outline
- 1.Background
- 2.Case study: An urban tree map
- 3.Methodology
- 4.Exploring missingness
- 4.1In/completeness
- 4.2Emptiness
- 4.3Absence
- 4.4Nothingness
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
References
References (43)
Bivand, R., Keitt, T., & Rowlingson, B. (2021). rgdal:
Bindings for the “Geospatial” Data Abstraction Library. [URL]
Davila, P. (2019). Diagrams
of Power: Visualizing, mapping and performing resistance (01
edition). Eindhoven. Onomatopee.
D’Ignazio, C. (2017). Creative
data literacy: Bridging the gap between the data-haves and data-have nots. Information Design
Journal, 23(1), 6–18.
D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2016). Feminist
Data Visualization. IEEE VIS Conference,
Baltimore, October. 23–28.
Dörk, M., Feng, P., Collins, C., & Carpendale, S. (2013). Critical
InfoVis: Exploring the Politics of Visualization. CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors
in Computing Systems, 2189–2198.
Dowle, M., & Srinivasan, A. (2021). data.table:
Extension of `data.frame`. [URL]
Drucker, J. (2011). Humanities
approaches to graphical display. Digital Humanities
Quarterly, 5(1), 1–21.
Fernstad, S. J. (2019). To
identify what is not there: A definition of missingness patterns and evaluation of missing value
visualization. Information
Visualization, 18(2), 230–250.
Geoportal
Berlin. (n.d.a). Baumbestand Berlin – Anlagenbäume. [URL]
. (n.d.b). Baumbestand Berlin – Straßenbäume. [URL]
Hall, P., Heath, C., & Coles-Kemp, L. (2015). Critical
visualization: A case for rethinking how we visualize risk and security. Journal of
Cybersecurity, 1(1), 93–108.
Hengesbach, N. (2022). Undoing
Seamlessness: Exploring Seams for Critical Visualization. CHI Conference on Human Factors in
Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA. New York, NY, USA.
Hijmans, R. J. (2020). raster:
Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling. [URL]
(2021). terra:
Spatial Data Analysis. [URL]
Kay, M., Kola, T., Hullman, J., & Munson, S. (2016). When(ish)
is My Bus? User-centered Visualizations of Uncertainty in Everyday, Mobile Predictive
Systems. ACM Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). [URL]
Kennedy, H., Hill, R. L., Aiello, G., & Allen, W. (2016). The
work that visualisation conventions do. Information, Communication &
Society, 19(6), 715–735.
Kinkeldey, C., MacEachren, A. M., Riveiro, M., & Schiewe, J. (2017). Evaluating
the effect of visually represented geodata uncertainty on decision-making: Systematic review, lessons learned, and
recommendations. Cartography and Geographic Information
Science, 44(1), 1–21.
Kosminsky, D., Walny, J., Vermeulen, J., Knudsen, S., Willett, W., & Carpendale, S. (2019). Belief
at first sight: Data visualization and the rationalization of seeing. Information Design
Journal, 25(1), 43–55.
Lockton, D., Ricketts, D., Aditya Chowdhury, S., & Lee, C. H. (2017). Exploring
qualitative displays and interfaces. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts
on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1844–1852.
Loukissas, Y. A. (2016). A
place for Big Data: Close and distant readings of accessions data from the Arnold
Arboretum. Big Data &
Society, 3(2), 2053951716661365.
(2019). All
data are local: Thinking critically in a data-driven society. Cambridge, MA. The MIT Press.
Meyer, M., & Dykes, J. (2019). Criteria
for Rigor in Visualization Design Study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer
Graphics.
McCurdy, N., Gerdes, J., & Meyer, M. (2019). A
Framework for Externalizing Implicit Error Using Visualization. IEEE Transactions on
Visualization and Computer
Graphics, 25(1), 925–935.
McInerny, G. (2018). Visualizing data: A view from design space. In Routledge Handbook of Interdisciplinary Research Methods (pp. 133–141). Routledge.
McNutt, A., Kindlmann, G., & Correll, M. (2020). Surfacing
Visualization Mirages. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing
Systems, 1–16.
Offenhuber, D. (2019). Data
by Proxy – Material Traces as Autographic Visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization
and Computer
Graphics, 26(1), 98–108.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL]
Ricker, B., Kraak, M.-J., & Engelhardt, Y. (2020). 24.
The power of visualization choices: Different images of patterns in space. Data Visualization
in Society, 4071.
Roberts, J. C. (2007). State
of the art: Coordinated & multiple views in exploratory visualization. Fifth International
Conference on Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization (CMV
2007), 61–71.
Skeels, M., Lee, B., Smith, G., & Robertson, G. G. (2010). Revealing
uncertainty for information visualization. Information
Visualization, 9(1), 70–81.
Song, H., & Szafir, D. A. (2018). Where’s
My Data? Evaluating Visualizations with Missing Data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and
Computer
Graphics, 25(1), 914–924.
Urbanek, S. (2013). png:
Read and write PNG images. [URL]
van Geenen, D., & Wieringa, M. (2020). 9.
Approaching data visualizations as interfaces: An empirical demonstration of how data are imag (in)
ed. Data Visualization in Society, 1411.
Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2:
Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York. [URL].
Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., & Müller, K. (2021). dplyr:
A Grammar of Data Manipulation. [URL]
Wilke, C. O. (2020). cowplot:
Streamlined Plot Theme and Plot Annotations for “ggplot2.” [URL]
