Cover not available

Article published In: Information Design Journal
Vol. 22:1 (2016) ► pp.49–61

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Does detail matter? The effect of visual detail in line drawings on task execution

Published online: 28 July 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.22.1.05ale
User manuals often include stylized line drawings to enable accurate and efficient task execution. This study reports the results of an empirical test which aimed at answering the question whether the amount of visual detail in such line drawings affects users’ performance. Results indicate that manuals containing illustrations with optimal amount of detail from a graphic designer’s point of view lead to significantly faster task execution compared to illustrations with the amount of detail beyond or below that level. Age was not a factor here, which suggests that optimizing the amount of detail in line drawings supports younger and older users alike.
References (31)
Agrawala, M., Li, W., & Berthouzoz, F. (2011). Design principles for visual communication. Communications of the ACM, 54(1), 60–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexander, K. (2013). Kompendium der visuellen Information und Kommunikation. Berlin: Springer Vieweg. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bieger, G.R., & Glock, M.D. (1984). The information content of picture-text instruction. Journal of Experimental Education, 531, 68–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1986). Comprehending spatial and contextual information in picture-text instructions. Journal of Experimental Education, 54(4), 181–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carpenter, P., Miyake, A., & Just, M.A. (1994): Working memory constraints in comprehension: Evidence from individual differences, aphasia and aging. In M.A. Gersnbacher (Ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 1075–1122). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooper, L.A., Schacter, D.L., Ballesteros, S., & Moore, C. (1992). Priming and recognition of transformed three-dimensional objects: Effects of size and reflection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 181, 43–58 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Craik, F.I.M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1041, 268–294. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dwyer, F.M. (1978). Strategies for improving visual learning. Pennsylvania: Learning Services.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engelkamp, J. (2004). Gedächtnis für Bilder. In K. Sachs-Hombach & K. Rehkämper (Eds.), Bild—Bildwahrnehmung—Bildverarbeitung. Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zur Bildwissenschaft (pp. 227–242). Wiesbaden: DUV. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gollin, E.S., & Sharps, M.S. (1988). Facilitation of free recall by categorical blocking depends on stimulus type. Memory & Cognition, 16(6), 539–544. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gombrich, E.H. (1982). The image and the eye. Oxford: Phaidon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, F., Pleimling, D., Hosemann, J., Füssel, S., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2013). Subjective impressions do not mirror online reading effort: Concurrent EEG-eyetracking evidence from the reading of books and digital media. PLoS ONE, 8(2): e56178. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, Elaine (1988). Design principles for pictorial information. In S. Doheny-Farina (Ed.), Effective documentation: What we have learned from research (pp. 235–253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loftus, G.R., & Bell, S.M. (1975). Two types of information in picture memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1(2), 103–113 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayer, R.E. (2009). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayer, R.E., & Gallini, J.K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 715–726 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R.E. (2002). Learning science in virtual reality multimedia environments: Role of methods and media. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 598–610 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morrell, R.W., & Park, D.C. (1993). The effects of age, illustrations, and task variables on the performance of procedural assembly tasks. Psychology and Aging, 8(3), 389–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nelson, T.O., Metzler, J., & Reed, D.A. (1974). Role of details in the long-term recognition of pictures and verbal descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1021, 155–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paivio, A. (2006). Imagery and verbal processes. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pedzek, K., & Chen, H.-C. (1982). Developmental differences in the role of detail in picture recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 331, 207–215 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pedzek, K., Maki, R., Valencia-Laver, D., Whetstone, T., Stoeckert, J., & Dougherty, T. (1988). Picture memory: Recognizing added and deleted details. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 468–476. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [[URL]].
Richards, C., Bussard, N.D., & Newman, R. (2007). Weighing-up line weights: The value of differing line thickness in technical illustrations. Information Design Journal, 15(2), 171–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schriver, K. (1997). Dynamics in document design. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hees, M.M.W. (1996). User instructions for the elderly: What the literature tells us. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 26(4), 521–536. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horen, F., Jansen, C., Maes, A., & Noordman, L. (2001). Manuals for the elderly: Which information cannot be missed? Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 31(4), 415–431. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). Manuals for the elderly: Text characteristics that help or hinder older users. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference , 334–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westendorp, P. (2002). Presentation media for product interaction (Doctoral dissertation). University of Delft, The Netherlands.
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Bsdurrek, Pia & Michael Meng
2025. Simply Effective? Simplified User Interfaces in Software Tutorials. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 55:3 ► pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Mattern, Shannon
2024. Step by Step. Places Journal :2024 DOI logo
Richards, Daniel P. & Erin E. Jacobson
2022. How Real Is Too Real? User-Testing the Effects of Realism as a Risk Communication Strategy in Sea Level Rise Visualizations. Technical Communication Quarterly 31:2 ► pp. 190 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue