Cover not available

Article published In: Information Design Journal
Vol. 27:3 (2022) ► pp.278–294

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

A quantitative framework for analyzing distinctive features of typography

ORCiD logo with link | University of Southern Denmark
ORCiD logo with link | University of Southern Denmark
ORCiD logo with link | University of Southern Denmark
Published online: 9 December 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.21005.joh
Abstract
The ability to quantify and compare typography has potential in many disciplines such as marketing, branding, education, and literacy studies. However, formal features of typography have been difficult to operationalize for quantitative analysis. The article proposes a quantitative, distinctive feature-based framework for describing and comparing fonts. The analyses made using the framework yield a clear and quantifiable separation of well-established typographical categories. It is also sensitive enough to pick up even small variations between fonts. The framework can aid in developing a more generally accepted typographical meta-language that allows for comparison and cross-fertilization of typographical knowledge across disciplines.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
  • 3.Procedure
    • 3.1Data collection
    • 3.2Measurements
    • 3.3Deriving values for distinctive features
      • 3.3.1Weight
      • 3.3.2Tension
      • 3.3.3Contrast
      • 3.3.4Orientation
      • 3.3.5Expansion
      • 3.3.6Slope
      • 3.3.7Connectivity
      • 3.3.8Curvature
    • 3.4Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Conclusion
  • 6.Afterword
  • Notes
  • References
References (32)
References
Abdi, H., & Williams, L. J. (2010). Principal component analysis. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: computational statistics, 2(4), 433–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ahmed, M. M. (2013). Typeface persona: Investigating Gotham’s suitability for Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Howard University, Washington, DC. Retrieved from [URL]
Armean, O. (2016). New Media Typography. Journal of Media Research-Revista de Studii Media, 9(24), 28–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bateman, J. A., Veloso, F. O., & Lau, Y. L. (2019). On the track of visual style: A diachronic study of page composition in comics and its functional motivation. Visual Communication, 1470357219839101.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauermeister, B. (1988). A manual of comparative typography: the PANOSE system. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beier, S., & Oderkerk, C. A. T. (2019). The effect of age and font on reading ability. Visible Language, 53(3), 50–68. [URL] [URL]
Bringhurst, R. (1997). The elements of typographic style (2nd ed.). Hartley & Marks.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brumberger, E. R. (2003). The rhetoric of typography: The persona of typeface and text. Technical communication, 50(2), 206–223.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Laurentis, M. S., Bauermeister, B., Beausoleil, R. G., Brown, G. N., & McQueen III, C. D. (1993). PANOSE 2.0 White Paper. Hewlett-Packard Corporation. Retrieved July 6th 2022 from [URL]
Hyndman, S. (2016). Why fonts matter. Random House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johannessen, C. M. (2011). The Forensic Analysis of Graphic Trademarks. A multimodal social semiotic approach. University of Southern Denmark. Odense.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Experiential meaning potential in the Topaz Energy logo: A framework for graphemic and graphetic analysis of graphic logo design. Social Semiotics, 1–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johannessen, C. M., Tvede, M. L., Claussen-Boesen, K., and Hiippala, T. (2021) “A Corpus-Based Approach to Color, Shape, and Typography in Logos”. In: Pflaeging, J., Wildfeuer, J., and Bateman, J. (Eds) Empirical Multimodality Research: Methods, Evaluations, Implications. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 159–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Järlehed, J., & Jaworski, A. (2015). Typographic landscaping: Creativity, ideology, movement. In: Taylor & Francis. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lupton, E. (2014). Thinking with type: A critical guide for designers, writers, editors, & students. Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morrissy, S. (2017). Inexplicable in the last resort. Information Design Journal, 23(2), 184–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MyFonts. (2020). Display Fonts. Retrieved November 18th from [URL]
Nørgaard, N. (2009). The semiotics of typography in literary texts. A multimodal approach. Orbis litterarum, 64(2), 141–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pantaleo, S. (2014). Elementary students consider the “what” and “how” of typography in picturebooks. New Review of Children’s Literature and Librarianship, 20(2), 144–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rajabi, E. (2020). Typography as a regime of reading/looking in Toni Morrison’s The Bluest Eye (1970). Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1), 1811580. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ravelli, L. J., & Starfield, S. (2008). Typography and disciplinary identity in academic writing. Information Design Journal, 16(2), 133–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spitzmüller, J. (2015). Graphic variation and graphic ideologies: A metapragmatic approach. Social Semiotics, 25(2), 126–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stöckl, H. (2005). Typography: body and dress of a text-a signing mode between language and image. Visual Communication, 4(2), 204–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stötzner, A. (2003). Signography as a subject in its own right. Visual Communication, 2(3), 285–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Maaten, L., & Hinton, G. (2008). Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of machine learning research, 9(11), 2579–2605.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. (2005a). Introducing Social Semiotics. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005b). Typographic Meaning. Visual Communication, 4(2), 137–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Towards a semiotics of typography. Information Design Journal, 14(2), 139–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veytsman, B., & Akhmadeeva, L. (2011). Towards evidence-based typography: Literature review and experiment design. In: TUGboat.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue