Cover not available

Article published In: Information Design Journal
Vol. 21:2 (2014) ► pp.129–145

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Effects of cognitive design principles on user’s performance and preference

A large scale evaluation of a soccer stats display

Published online: 3 November 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.21.2.05wes
We present an analytic and a large scale experimental comparison of two informationally equivalent information displays of soccer statistics. Both displays were presented by the BBC during the 2010 FIFA World Cup. The displays mainly differ in terms of the number and types of cognitively natural mappings between visual variables and meaning. Theoretically, such natural form-meaning mappings help users to interpret the information quickly and easily. However, our analysis indicates that the design which contains most of these mappings is inevitably inconsistent in how forms and meanings are mapped to each other. The experiment shows that this inconsistency was detrimental for how fast people can find information in the display and for which display people prefer to use. Our findings shed new light on the well-established cognitive design principle of natural mapping: while in theory, information designs may benefit from natural mapping, in practice its applicability may be limited. Information designs that contain a high number of form-meaning mappings, for example, for aesthetic reasons, risk being inconsistent and too complex for users, leading them to find information less quickly and less easily.
References (22)
Agrawala, M., Li, W., & Berthouzoz, F. (2011). Design principles for visual communication. Communications of the ACM, 54(4), 607–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertin, J. (1981). Graphics and graphic-information-processing. New York: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
British Broadcasting Corporation. (2010). Netherlands – Brazil. BBC Sport World Cup 2010. Retrieved March 6, 2011, from [URL]
Carpendale, M.S.T. (2003). Considering visual variables as a basis for information visualisation. University of Calgary, Department of computer science, 2001–693–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition, 1061, 579–593. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H.H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T.E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York, NY: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hegarty, M. (2011). The cognitive science of visual-spatial displays: implications for design. Topics in Cognitive Science, 31, 446–474. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kessell, A.M., & Tversky, B. (2008). Cognitive methods for visualizing space, time, and agents. In G. Stapleton, J. Howse, & J. Lee (Eds.), Theory and application of diagrams. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). Visualizing space, time, and agents: production, performance, and preference. Cognitive Processes, 121, 43–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kosslyn, S.M. (2006). Graph design for the eye and the mind. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larkin, J.H., & Simon, H.A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 111, 65–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacDonald-Ross, M. (1977). How numbers are shown: A review of research on the presentation of quantitive data in texts. AV Communication Review, 25(4), 359–409.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shah, P., & Freedman, E.G. (2011). Bar and line graph comprehension: An interaction of top-down and bottom-up processes. Topics in Cognitive Science, 31, 560–578. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smallman, H.S., & Cook, M.B. (2011). Naïve realism: folk fallacies in the design and use of visual displays. Topics in Cognitive Science, 31, 579–608. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tversky, B. (2001). Spatial schemas in depictions. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas and abstract thought (pp. 79–111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011a). Visualizing thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 31, 499–535. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011b). Spatial thought, social thought. In T.W. Schubert & A. Maass (Eds.), Spatial dimensions of social thought (pp. 17–38). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S., & Winter, A. (1991). Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 231, 515–557. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vande Moere, A., & Purchase, H. (2011). On the role of design in information visualization. Information Visualization, 10(4), 356–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zacks, J., & Tversky, B. (1999). Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication. Memory and Cognition, 271, 1073–1079. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, J., & Norman, D.A. (1994). Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 181, 87–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue