Article published In: Information Design Journal
Vol. 16:2 (2008) ► pp.133–147
Typography and disciplinary identity in academic writing
Published online: 4 August 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.16.2.06rav
https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.16.2.06rav
This paper examines the potential significance of typographic variation in the front pages of a corpus of Humanities and Social Sciences doctoral theses. Some account is taken of the linguistic content of these pages, but the primary focus is on typographic resources such as font choice, salience, and layout. It is found that there is a strong association between the nature of the typographic choices and the disciplinary orientation. Specifically, the more marked semiotic resources are likely to be associated with theses which are oriented towards the “New Humanities”, that is, adopting a more subjective approach to research.
Keywords: typography, New Humanities , identity, academic writing
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Siess, Andreas
Luo, Yongjian, Linda Tsung & Wei Wang
Johannessen, Christian Mosbæk, Mads Nedergård Qwist & Anders Glent Buch
2022. A quantitative framework for analyzing distinctive features of typography. Information Design Journal 27:3 ► pp. 278 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
