Discourse cohesion in text and tutorial dialogue

Graesser, Arthur C.; Jeon, Moongee; Yan, Yan; Cai, Zhiqiang

doi:10.1075/idj.15.3.02gra

Article published In: Discourse, Cognition and Communication
Edited by Ted J.M. Sanders and Leo Lentz
[Information Design Journal 15:3] 2007
► pp. 199–213

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download PDF

Discourse cohesion in text and tutorial dialogue

Published online: 12 December 2007

https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.15.3.02gra

Discourse cohesion is presumably an important facilitator of comprehension when individuals read texts and hold conversations. This study investigated components of cohesion and language in different types of discourse about Newtonian physics: A textbook, textoids written by experimental psychologists, naturalistic tutorial dialoguebetween expert human tutors and college students, andAutoTutor tutorial dialogue between a computer tutor and students (AutoTutor is an animated pedagogical agent that helps students learn about physics by holding conversations in natural language). We analyzed the four types of discourse with Coh-Metrix, a software tool that measures discourse on different components of cohesion, language, and readability. The cohesion indices included co-reference, syntactic and semantic similarity, causal cohesion, incidence of cohesion signals (e.g., connectives, logical operators), and many other measures. Cohesion data were quite similar for the two forms of discourse in expository monologue (textbooks and textoids) and for the two types of tutorial dialogue (i.e., students interacting with human tutors and AutoTutor), but very different between the discourse of expository monologue and tutorial dialogue. Coh-Metrix was also able to detect subtle differences in the language and discourse of AutoTutor versus human tutoring.

Cited by (29)

Cited by 29 other publications

Order by:

Golparvar, Seyyed Ehsan, Guangwei Hu & Seyedeh Elaheh Seyedi

2025. Cohesion in the discussion section of research articles: A cross-disciplinary investigation. English for Specific Purposes 77 ► pp. 1 ff.

Li, Chili, Xue Wang & Long Qian

2025. Exploring Syntactic Complexity and Text Readability in an ELT Textbook Series for Chinese English Majors. SAGE Open 15:1

Golparvar, Seyyed Ehsan, Peter Crosthwaite & Elahe Ziaeian

2024. Mapping cohesion in research articles of applied linguistics: A close look at rhetorical sections. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 67 ► pp. 101316 ff.

Miragoli, Sarah, Vittoria Badino & Elena Camisasca

2022. Completezza e coerenza narrativa in bambini sessualmente abusati: il ruolo dell'età e del PTSD. MALTRATTAMENTO E ABUSO ALL'INFANZIA :1 ► pp. 33 ff.

Miragoli, Sarah, Vittoria Badino & Elena Camisasca

2025. Coherence in Children’s Reports of Sexual Abuse: Age, PTSD, and Questioning Style. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice 25:4 ► pp. 772 ff.

Tegge, Friederike, Katharina Parry & Diego Raphael Amancio

2020. The impact of differences in text segmentation on the automated quantitative evaluation of song-lyrics. PLOS ONE 15:11 ► pp. e0241979 ff.

García, J. Ricardo, Manuel Montanero, Manuel Lucero, Isabel Cañedo & Emilio Sánchez

2018. Comparing rhetorical devices in history textbooks and teachers’ lessons: Implications for the development of academic language skills. Linguistics and Education 47 ► pp. 16 ff.

Graesser, Arthur C., Nia Dowell, Andrew J. Hampton, Anne M. Lippert, Haiying Li & David Williamson Shaffer

2018. Building Intelligent Conversational Tutors and Mentors for Team Collaborative Problem Solving: Guidance from the 2015 Program for International Student Assessment. In Building Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Teams [Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 19], ► pp. 173 ff.

El Masri, Yasmine H., Jo-Anne Baird & Art Graesser

2016. Language effects in international testing: the case of PISA 2006 science items. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 23:4 ► pp. 427 ff.

Williams, Nigel L., Alessandro Inversini, Dimitrios Buhalis & Nicole Ferdinand

2015. Community crosstalk: an exploratory analysis of destination and festival eWOM on Twitter. Journal of Marketing Management 31:9-10 ► pp. 1113 ff.

Marmolejo-Ramos, Fernando, Julia Miller & Chad Habel

2014. The influence of question type, text availability, answer confidence and language background on student comprehension of an expository text. Higher Education Research & Development 33:4 ► pp. 712 ff.

Nye, Benjamin D., Arthur C. Graesser & Xiangen Hu

2014. AutoTutor and Family: A Review of 17 Years of Natural Language Tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 24:4 ► pp. 427 ff.

Injae Lim & 전문기

2013. A Corpus-based Analysis of the Listening Materials in Middle School English 1 Textbooks.. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 105 ff.

Sheehan, Kathleen M.

2013. Measuring Cohesion: An Approach That Accounts for Differences in the Degree of Integration Challenge Presented by Different Types of Sentences. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 32:4 ► pp. 28 ff.

Smolkin, Laura B., Erin M. McTigue & Yi-fen Y. Yeh

2013. Searching for Explanations in Science Trade Books: What can we learn from Coh-Metrix?. International Journal of Science Education 35:8 ► pp. 1367 ff.

Jackson, G. Tanner & Danielle S. McNamara

2012. Applying NLP Metrics to Students’ Self-Explanations. In Applied Natural Language Processing, ► pp. 261 ff.

Magliano, Joseph P. & Arthur C. Graesser

2012. Computer-based assessment of student-constructed responses. Behavior Research Methods 44:3 ► pp. 608 ff.

McCarthy, Philip M., David Dufty, Christian F. Hempelmann, Zhiqiang Cai, Danielle S. McNamara & Arthur C. Graesser

2012. Newness and Givenness of Information. In Cross-Disciplinary Advances in Applied Natural Language Processing, ► pp. 202 ff.

McCarthy, Philip M., David Dufty, Christian F. Hempelmann, Zhiqiang Cai, Danielle S. McNamara & Arthur C. Graesser

2012. Newness and Givenness of Information. In Applied Natural Language Processing, ► pp. 457 ff.

McNamara, Danielle S. & Arthur C. Graesser

2012. Coh-Metrix. In Applied Natural Language Processing, ► pp. 188 ff.

Bedwell, J.S., S. Gallagher, S.N. Whitten & S.M. Fiore

2011. Linguistic correlates of self in deceptive oral autobiographical narratives. Consciousness and Cognition 20:3 ► pp. 547 ff.

Gallagher, Shaun & Jonathan Cole

2011. Dissociation in self-narrative. Consciousness and Cognition 20:1 ► pp. 149 ff.

Graesser, Arthur C. & Danielle S. McNamara

2011. Computational Analyses of Multilevel Discourse Comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science 3:2 ► pp. 371 ff.

Morgan, Brent, Candice Burkett, Elizabeth Bagley & Arthur Graesser

2011. Typed versus Spoken Conversations in a Multi-party Epistemic Game. In Artificial Intelligence in Education [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6738], ► pp. 513 ff.

Klettke, Bianca, Arthur C. Graesser & Martine B. Powell

2010. Expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases: The effects of evidence, coherence and credentials on juror decision making. Applied Cognitive Psychology 24:4 ► pp. 481 ff.

McNamara, Danielle S., Scott A. Crossley & Philip M. McCarthy

2010. Linguistic Features of Writing Quality. Written Communication 27:1 ► pp. 57 ff.

McNamara, Danielle S., Max M. Louwerse, Philip M. McCarthy & Arthur C. Graesser

2010. Coh-Metrix: Capturing Linguistic Features of Cohesion. Discourse Processes 47:4 ► pp. 292 ff.

Jeon, Moongee & Roger Azevedo

2008. Automatic Analyses of Cohesion and Coherence in Human Tutorial Dialogues During Hypermedia: A Comparison among Mental Model Jumpers. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5091], ► pp. 690 ff.

Ward, Arthur & Diane Litman

2008. Semantic Cohesion and Learning. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5091], ► pp. 459 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.