Article published In: Information Design Journal
Vol. 15:1 (2007) ► pp.1–15
Comparing typefaces for airport signs
Published online: 11 May 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.15.1.01wal
https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.15.1.01wal
This study combined three research methodologies to inform the choice of a typeface for signs at London’s Heathrow Airport. The methodologies were legibility testing, qualitative consumer research, and expert review. The study showed that, contrary to a number of expert predictions, the serifed typeface performed as well as the sans serif in legibility testing. Character width was a more significant factor in legibility, with condensed sans serif performing relatively poorly. The use of multiple methodologies led to a richer basis for decision-making: the qualitative research revealed clear genre expectations among airport users for sans serif signs; the expert reviewers raised a range of additional issues of genre, culture and context.
Keywords: wayfinding, signage, typographic research, legibility, transport information
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
Beier, Sofie & Myra Thiessen
Cai, Jing, Dasu Zeng, Fengxiang Guo, Ran Zhang, Gen Li & Cheng Wang
Liu, Xiangmin, Xiaohua Zhao, Jia Li, Yibing Liu & Wenhui Dong
Schmid, Pascale, Wayne Thompson & David Sargent
Elbardawil, Shaima
2023. Empirical assessment of the legibility of the Naskh-style typeface used on Arabic road signs. Information Design Journal 28:2 ► pp. 178 ff.
Oderkerk, Chiron A. T. & Sofie Beier
Zhang, Yuchan & Jeanne-Louise Moys
2022. Effects of changes in spacing on dual-script sign
legibility. Information Design Journal 27:2 ► pp. 213 ff.
Beier, Sofie, Chiron A. T. Oderkerk, Birte Bay & Michael Larsen
2021. Increased letter spacing and greater letter width improve reading acuity in low vision readers. Information Design Journal 26:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Punsongserm, Rachapoom, Shoji Sunaga & Hisayasu Ihara
2018. Effectiveness of homologous Thai letterforms presented in parafoveal vision. Information Design Journal 24:2 ► pp. 92 ff.
Larson, Jerrod & David K. Farkas
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
