Article published In: Information Design Journal
Vol. 14:2 (2006) ► pp.162–171
Toward a better understanding of PowerPoint deck design
Published online: 7 July 2006
https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.14.2.08far
https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.14.2.08far
The critical landscape surrounding PowerPoint is highly troubled. Empirical research is scarce, and commentators share little common ground and have taken highly divergent positions. Often arguments are unnuanced and flawed. This review essay identifies and discusses ten problems that have confused and hindered the study of PowerPoint. Among the problems are these: The lack of terminology for categorizing deck content; the need for a more sophisticated understanding of mediation (how PowerPoint “edits thought”) and the relationship between PowerPoint and organizational culture; the formulation of broad arguments based on a narrow set of presentation genres; the habit of regarding slides as standalone artifacts divorced from the presentation; and insufficient attention to context (the particular circumstances surrounding a presentation) including the personal style of the presenter. If we can achieve a healthier critical landscape, we will see better commentary, research studies, decks, and presentations.
Keywords: presentations, oral communication, speech communication, PowerPoint
Cited by (16)
Cited by 16 other publications
Wolfe, Joanna, Nisha Shanmugaraj, Juliann Reineke, Laura Caton Peet & Craig P. Moreau
Cosgun Ögeyik, Muhlise
Bourgoin, Alaric & Fabian Muniesa
Kernbach, Sebastian, Sabrina Bresciani & Martin J. Eppler
Kjeldsen, Jens E. & Frode Guribye
Worthington, Debra L. & David G. Levasseur
Renata A. Cadena & Solange G. Coutinho
Galbraith, Craig S., Bruce C. McKinney, Alex F. DeNoble & Sanford B. Ehrlich
Roels, Reinout & Beat Signer
Kernbach, Sebastian & Sabrina Bresciani
Adams, Catherine
Omerovic, Sanida, Saso Tomazic, Milan Milutinovic & Veljko Milutinovic
Spicer, Ryan P. & Aisling Kelliher
Lanir, Joel, Kellogg S. Booth & Anthony Tang
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
