Cover not available

Article published In: InContext
Vol. 2:3 (2022) ► pp.84–104

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Profiling of (Ir)reversible binomials in translated arabic texts

A corpus-based study

 | Imam Mohamed Ibn Saud Islamic University, Saudi Arabia | Al-Azhar University, Egypt
 | Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, South Korea
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 29 November 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.54754/incontext.v2i3.29
Abstract
A binomial, or binomial pair, is a pair of words conventionally linked by a lexical link such as a conjunction or a preposition, for example, “day and night”, “life and death”, “dos and don’ts”, etc. Binomials are very common in all languages. Binomials can be reversible or irreversible; i.e. they share/do not share the same word order in the Source Language or Target Language. Binomials play a very import role in learners’ or speakers’ competence; the more binomials you are familiar with the more competent one would be. In this paper, we will examine binomials in the Arabic language; we will use corpus-based approaches to explore how binomials are reversible in Arabic and English. In an attempt to find a practical-digital way for language learners and translators to rely on when they come across conjoined words, mainly binomials, different approaches to binomial extraction have been explored. Corpus linguistic techniques and Mutual Information1 statistics are used to test the relations between the different parts of binomials; the most frequent binomials and conjoined phrases are analyzed in an Arabic text coupled with their translations into English. By calculating the significant binomials, mutual information helps us to identify what to examine in the concordance lines. Based on the analysis of the concordances of the data, some rules have been proposed, something which would enable language learners and translators to make generalizations and reach firmer conclusions regarding the order of parts within binomials and whether they are reversible or irreversible when translated from one language into another.
ملخص
الثنائياتاللغوية،أواألزواجاللغويةتتكونعادلةمنكلمتينيربطبينهماحرفعطفغالبا،علىسبيلالمثال:الليلوالنهار، الموتوالحياة،والمسموحاتوالممنوعاتالخ.الثنائياتاللغويةشائعةجدافيجميعاللغات،والسيمافيالنصوصالدينية.يمكن أنتكونالثنائياتاللغويةقابلةللموافقةاللغويةمعاللغةالمترجممنها/إليهاأوال؛أيأنهاتشارك/التشاركنفسترتيبالكلماتفي لغةالمصدرأواللغةالمترجمإليها.تلعبالثنائياتاللغويةدوراًمهماًفيكفاءةالمتعلمينأوالمتحدثين؛وكلمازادعددالثنائياتاللغوية التييعرفهاالشخصكلماتحسنتكفاءتهاللغوية.فيهذاالبحث،سنبحثفيالثنائياتاللغويةفياللغةالعربية؛سنستخدمالمقاربات المستندةإلىالتحليلالقائمعلىلسانياتالمتونأوعلممتناللغةالستكشافكيفيةترجمةالثنائياتاللغويةباللغتينالعربيةواإلنجليزية. فيمحاولةإليجادطريقةرقميةعمليةلمتعلمياللغةوالمترجمينلالعتمادعليهاعندماتكونهناكثنائياتلغوية،تماستكشافطرق مختلفةالستخراجالثنائياتاللغوية.تماستخدامتقنياتاللغاتالمصدروإحصاءاتالمعلوماتالمتبادلةالختبارالعالقاتبينمختلف أجزاءالثنائياتاللغوية؛سيتمتحليلأكثرعباراتالثنائياتاللغويةوالعباراتالمترابطةفينصعربيمعترجمتهاإلىاللغةاإلنجليزية. ومنخاللحسابالثنائياتاللغويةالمهمة،تساعدناالمعلوماتالمتبادلةفيتحديدمايجبفحصهافيخطوطالتوافق.وبناءعلىتحليل توافقالبيانات،اقترحنابعضالقواعد،وهواألمرالذيسيمكنمتعلمياللغاتوالمترجمينمنالحصولعلىصورةعامةلمعاني الثنائياتاللغويةوالتوصلإلىاستنتاجاتأكثرتماسكافيمايتعلقبترتيباألجزاءداخلالثنائياتاللغويةوماإذاكانتقابلةللعكسأوال
References (41)
References
Abraham, Richard D. (1950). Fixed order of coordinates: A study in comparative lexicography. The Modern Language Journal, 34(4), 276–287.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Al-Jarf, Reima. (2016). Translation of English and Arabic binomials by advanced and novice student translators. In Larisa Ilynska & Marina Platonova (Eds.), Meaning in Translation: Illusion of Precision (pp. 281–298). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Al-Otaibi, Ghuzayyil. (2021). Religious binomials in Hebrew and Arabic: A review of literature. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(3), 209–215.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexander, Richard. (1989). Fixed expressions, idioms and collocations revisited. In Paul Meara (Ed.), Beyond Words: British Studies in Applied Linguistics (Vol. 41, pp. 15–24).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnbrook, Geoff. (1996). A Practical Introduction to the Computer Analysis of Language. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bassnett, Susan. (2002). Translation Studies. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bassnett, Susan and André Lefevere (Eds.). (1990). Translation, History, and Culture. Pinter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benor, Sarah Bunin and Roger Levy. (2006). The chicken or the egg? A probabilistic analysis of English binomials. Language, 821, 233–278.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald. (1987). Vocabulary: Applied Linguistic Perspectives. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chamberlain, Lori. (1992). Gender and the metaphorics of translation. In Lawrence Venuti (Ed.), Rethinking Translation: Discourse, Subjectivity, Ideology (pp. 57–74). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Church, Kenneth, William Gale, Patrick Hanks and Donald Hindle. (1991). Using statistics in lexical analysis. In Uri Zernik (Ed.), Lexical Acquisition: Exploiting On-line Resources to Build a Lexicon (pp. 115–164). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Church, Kenneth and Patrick Hanks. (1990). Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 16(1), 22–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooper, William E. and John R. Ross. (1975). World order. In Robin E. Grossman, L. James San & Timothy J. Vance (Eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism (pp. 63–111). Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowie, Anthony P. (1988). Stable and creative aspects of vocabulary use. In Ronald Carter & Michael Mccarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and Language Teaching (pp. 126–139). Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruse, David Alan. (2000). Meaning in Languages: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, David. (1987). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dickins, James, Sandor Hervey and Ian Higgins. (2002). Thinking Arabic Translation, A Course in Translation Method: Arabic to English. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ebeling, Jarl and Signe Oksefjell Ebeling. (2015). An English-Norwegian contrastive analysis of downtoners, more or less. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 14(1), 62–89.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emery, Peter. (1988). Body-Part Collocations and Idioms in Arabic and English [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Manchester.
Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud. (2001). Familiarity, information flow, and linguistic form. Typological Studies in Language, 451, 431–448.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1989). Word frequency and word order in freezes. Linguistics, 271, 517–556.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firth, John Rupert. (1957). Papers in Linguistics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael. (2005). Lexical Priming: A New Theory of Words and Language. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2003). What’s in a word? MED Magazine, (101). [URL]
Hussein, Riyad F. and Richard Lingwood. (2011). Strategies used in translating English binomials into Arabic. Babel, 57(2), 168–184.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kjellmer, Goran. (1991). A mint of phrases. In Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (Eds.), English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik (pp. 111–127). Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Latham, Peter E. and Yasser Roudi. (2009). Mutual information. Scholarpedia, 4(1), 1658. Retrieved November 6, 2022 from [URL]
Lehrer, Adrienne. (1974). Semantic Fields and Lexical Structure. North-Holland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, Michael. (1993). The Lexical Approach. Language Teaching Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov. (1959). Studies in irreversible binomials. Lingua, 81, 113–160.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McIntosh, Angus and Michael Alexander Kirkwood Halliday. (1966). Patterns of Language. Papers in General, Descriptive and Applied Linguistics. Longmans.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mollin, Sandra. (2012). Revisiting binomial order in English: Ordering constraints and reversibility. English Language & Linguistics, 16(1), 81–103.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko. (2013). Gentlemen before ladies? A corpus-based study of conjunct order in personal binomials. Journal of English Linguistics, 41(3), 212–242.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nattinger, James R. (1980). A lexical phrase grammar for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 141, 337–344.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nöth, Winfried. (1993). Iconicity of symmetries and asymmetries in syntactic coordination. In Christoph Küper (Ed.), Von der Sprache zur Literatur. Motiviertheit im sprachlichen und im poetischen Kode. [From language to literature. Motivation in the linguistic and in the poetic code] (pp. 23–36). Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parker, Steve. (2003). The psychological reality of sonority in English. Word, 54(3), 359–399.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolf and Sidney Greenbaum. (1973). A University Grammar of English. Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snell-Hornby, Mary. (1990). Linguistic transcoding or cultural transfer? A critique of translation theory in Germany. In Susan Bassnett & André Lefevere (Eds.), Translation, History, and Culture (pp. 79–86). Pinter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael. (1996). Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence. (1995). The Translator’s Invisibility. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue