In:Dynamics of Linguistic Diversity
Edited by Hagen Peukert and Ingrid Gogolin
[Hamburg Studies on Linguistic Diversity 6] 2017
► pp. 217–234
Teaching academic discourse practices in multilingual classrooms
Insights into coding results and qualitative analyses of a video study
Published online: 24 May 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/hsld.6.11lan
https://doi.org/10.1075/hsld.6.11lan
Abstract
Students’ success in school is closely linked to the mastering of academic language. In the context of linguistic und socio-cultural diversity, teaching practices which support students’ acquisition of this capability have become increasingly important. Empirical research in this field, however, is scarce. The video study Bildungssprachförderliches Lehrerhandeln (‘Teaching practices of academic language support’ – BilLe) analyzes the teaching of academic discourse practices in regular multilingual classrooms with a focus on teachers’ activities. The project is embedded in intercultural educational research focusing on curriculum development. For the purpose of this study, expert teachers were video-taped in regular lessons in various types of schools, grades and subjects. Based on content-based analyses (low-inference video coding) and interpretive video interaction analyses this article presents results from the part of the BilLe study that focused on a primary school.
Article outline
- 0.Overview
- 1.The BilLe video study: Theoretical background and research design
- 1.1Theoretical background
- 1.2Research design
-
2.Coding results of the surface structures (quantitative analyses)
- 2.1Organization of classroom interaction
- 2.2Teacher and student talk time during whole-class work
- 3.Sample results from qualitative analyses in a primary school
- 3.1The presentation
- 3.2The reflection session after the presentation
- 3.3Insights obtained from the analyses
- 4.Summary
Notes References
References (39)
Ackermann, S. 2011. Klassengespräch im Mathematikunterricht. Eine Pilotstudie im Rahmen des Projekts Persönlichkeits- und Lernentwicklung von Grundschulkindern. Kassel: Kassel University Press. <[URL]> (21 July 2014).
Becker-Mrozek, M. 2011. Der Erzählkreis als Exempel für die Besonderheiten der Unterrichtskommunikation. Osnabrücker Beiträge zur Sprachtheorie 80
:
31–45.
Bezemer, J. 2003. Dealing with multilingualism in a Dutch primary school. An ethnographic study of the practice of teaching spelling to first and second language learners. In Investigating Educational Policy through Ethnography, G. Walford (ed.), 193–213. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2014. How to transcribe multimodal interaction? A case study. In Texts, Images and Interaction: A Reader in Multimodalit, C.D. Maier & S. Norris (eds), 155–169. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bourne, J. 2013. ‘I know he can do better than that’: Strategies for teaching and learning in successful multi-ethnic schools. In Herausforderung Bildungssprache – und wie man sie meistert, I. Gogolin, I. Lange, U. Michel & H.H. Reich (eds), 42–54. Münster: Waxmann.
Council of Europe. 2009. Languages of schooling. <[URL]> (22 July 2014).
Cummins, J. 2008. BICS and CALP. Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Vol. 2, N. Hornberger (ed.), 2nd edn, 487–499. New York NY: Springer.
Fürstenau, S. (ed.). 2012. Interkulturelle Pädagogik und Sprachliche Bildung. Herausforderungen für die Lehrerbildung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
2016. Teaching practices of academic language support. A video-based analysis of mathematics lessons in Germany and Switzerland. American Journal of Educational Research 4(1): 91–103.
Fürstenau, S., Beckmann, V. & Galling, I. 2015. Bildungssprachförderliches Lehrerhandeln und Sprachbetrachtung: Eine empirische Analyse sprachlichen Handelns im Lateinunterricht. In Herkunftsbedingte Mehrsprachigkeit im Unterricht der romanischen Sprachen, E.M. Fernández Ammann, A. Kropp & J. Müller-Lancé (eds), 253–278. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
Fürstenau, S. & Lange, I. 2013. Bildungssprachförderliches Lehrerhandeln. Eine videobasierte Unterrichtsstudie. In Herausforderung Bildungssprache, I. Gogolin, I. Lange, U. Michel, H.H. Reich (eds), 188–219. Münster: Waxmann.
Gogolin, I. 2009. “Bildungssprache” – The importance of teaching language in every school subject. In Science Education Unlimited: Approaches to Equal Opportunities in Learning Science, T. Tajmel & K. Starl (eds), 91–102. Münster: Waxmann.
Gogolin, I. & Lange, I. 2011. Bildungssprache und Durchgängige Sprachbildung. In Migration und schulischer Wandel: Mehrsprachigkeit, S. Fürstenau & M. Gomolla (eds), 107–127. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Gogolin, I., Lange, I., Michel, U. & Reich, H.H. (eds). 2013. Herausforderung Bildungssprache – Und wie man sie meistert. Münster: Waxmann.
Gossen, C. 2001. Freies Erzählen in der Grundschule. Eine empirische Studie. MA thesis, University of Cologne. <[URL]> (14 July 2014).
Green, J.L., Skukauskaite, A. & Baker, W.D. 2012. Ethnography as epistemology: Introduction to educational ethnography. In Research Methodologies and Methods in Education, J. Arthur, M.I. Waring, R. Coe & L.V. Hedges (eds), 309–321. London: Sage.
Heller, V. & Morek, M. 2015. Academic discourse as situated practice: An introduction. Linguistics and Education 31
:
174–186.
Helmke, A. 2011. Forschung zur Lernwirksamkeit des Lehrerhandelns. In Handbuch der Forschung zum Lehrerberuf, E. Terhart, H. Bennewitz & M. Rothland (eds), 630–643. Münster: Waxmann.
KMK (Kultusministerkonferenz). 2005a. Bildungsstandards im Fach Deutsch für den Primarbereich. Decree of 15 October 2004. Munich: Wolters Kluwer.
. 2005b. Bildungsstandards im Fach Mathematik für den Primarbereich. Decree of 15 October 2004. Munich: Wolters Kluwer.
. 2010. Glossary on education. Institutions, examinations, qualifications, titles and other specialist terms. Bonn. <[URL]> (17 June 2016).
Knoblauch, H., Tuma, R. & Schnettler, B. 2010. Interpretative Videoanalysen in der Sozialforschung. In Enzyklopädie Erziehungswissenschaft Online (EEO), S. Maschke & L. Stecher (eds), 2–40. Weinheim: Juventa.
Kocher, M., Wyss, C. & Baer, M. 2013. Unterrichten im Berufseinstieg – Wirkung der Praxiserfahrung und Vergleich mit erfahrenen Lehrpersonen. Unterrichtswissenschaft 41(2): 125–151.
Mercer, N. 2008. The Guided Construction of Knowledge. Talk amongst Teachers and Learners, 6th edn. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Redder, A. & Weinert, S. (eds). 2013. Sprachförderung und Sprachdiagnostik. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven. Münster: Waxmann.
Rowe, M.B. 1986. Slowing down may be a way of speeding up. Journal of Teacher Education 37(1):
43–50.
Schleppegrell, M. 2008. The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Routledge.
Schmidt, C. 2013. Auswertungstechniken für Leitfadeninterviews. In Handbuch Qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft, 4th edn, B. Friebertshäuser, A. Langer & A. Prengel (eds), 473–486). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
Schulz, A. 2011. Experimentierspezifische Qualitätsmerkmale im Chemieunterricht. Eine Videostudie. Berlin: Logos.
Seidel, T. 2003. Lehr-Lernskripts im Unterricht. Freiräume und Einschränkungen für kognitive und motivationale Lernprozesse – eine Videostudie im Physikunterricht. Münster: Waxmann.
Seidel, T., Prenzel, M. & Kobarg, M. (eds). 2005. How to Run a Video Study. Technical Report of the IPN Video Study. Münster: Waxmann.
Stigler, J.W., Gonsales, P., Kawanaka, T., Knoll, S. & Serrano, A. 1999. The TIMSS videotape classroom study: methods and preliminary findings from an exploratory research project on eighth-grade mathematics instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Beckmann, Vera
Foppen, Lisa & Vera Beckmann
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
