Cover not available

In:Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 18391851

References (62)
References
Birdwhistell, R. L. 1960. Kinesics and communication. In Carpenter E. & M. Mcluhan (eds.) Explorations in communication: 54–64. Beacon Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyes Braem, P. 1990. Einführung in die Gebärdensprache und ihre Forschung. Signum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bright, W. (ed.) 1992. International encyclopedia of linguistics, 4 vols. Oxford Univ. Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, R. 1973. A first language. Harvard Univ. Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Button, G. & J. R. Lee. 1987. Talk and social organisation. Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Button, G., P. Drew & J. Heritage. 1986. Transcription notation. In G. Button, P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.) Interaction and language use. Human Studies 9(Special issue): 109–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clifford, J. 1990. Notes on (field)notes. In Sanjek R. (ed.) Fieldnotes: 47–70. Cornell Univ. Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, G. 1990. Transcribing infinity. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. 1990. Discovering rhythm in conversational English. Arbeitspapier 13. Univ. Konstanz. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W., S. Schuetze- Coburn & S. Cumming & D. Paolino. 1993. Outline of discourse transcription. In Edwards J. A. & M. D. Lampert (eds.). 45–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckert, P. 1993. Cooperative competition in adolescent ‘girl talk’. In Tannen D. (ed.) Gender and conversational interaction: 32–61. Oxford Univ. Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, J. A. 1989. Transcription and the new functionalism. Berkeley Cognitive Science Report58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, J A. l992a. Computer methods in child language research. Journal of Child Language 19: 435–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
l992b. Transcription of discourse. In W. Bright (ed.), vol. 1: 367–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
l993a. Perfecting research techniques in an imperfect world. Journal of Child Language 20: 209–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
l993b. Principles and contrasting systems of discourse transcription. In J.A Edwards & M.D Lampert (eds.): 3–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edwards, J. A. & M..D. Lampert. 1993. Talking data. Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehlich, K. 1993. HIAT: A transcription system for discourse data. In Edwards J. A. & M. D. Lampert (eds.). 123–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehlich, K. & J. Rehbein. 1976. Halbinterpretative Arbeitstranskriptionen (HIAT). Linguistische Berichte 45: 21–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1979. Erweiterte halbinterpretative Arbeitstranskriptionen (HIAT 2): Intonation. Linguistische Berichte 59: 51–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1981. Zur Notierung nonverbaler Kommunikation fűr diskursanalytische Zwecke (Erweiterte halbinterpretative Arbeitstranskriptionen [HIAT 2]). In Winkler P. (ed.) Methoden der Analyse von Face-to-Face-Situationen: 302–329. J. B. Metzler. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fishman, P..M. 1978. Interaction. Social Problems 25: 397–406. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. & N. Berenz. 1993. Transcribing conversational exchange. In Edwards J. A. & M. D. Lampert (eds.). 91–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. 1988. Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for a ‘standard maximum’ silence of approximately one second in conversation. In Roger D. & P. Bull (eds.). 166–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, C. E. 2000. What you see is what you get: The importance of transcription for interpreting children’s morphosyntactic development. In Menn L. & N. B. Ratner (eds.). 181–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly, J. & J. K. Local. 1988. On the use of general phonetic techniques in handling conversational material. In Roger D. & P. Bull (eds.). 197–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keseling, G., A. Wrobel & C. Rau. 1987. Globale und lokale Planung beim Schreiben. Unterrichtswissenschaft 4: 349–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kohler, K. J. 1977. Einführung in die Phonetik des Deutschen. Erich Schmidt. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kowal, S. & D. C. O’Connell. 1993. Zeichen für Zeit in Gesprächstranskriptionen. Paper, 7th International Convention of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Semiotik, Tübingen. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Notation und Transkription in der Gesprächsforschung. In D. C. O’Connell, S. Kowal & R. Posner (eds.) Zeichen für Zeit — Zur Notation und Transkription von Bewegungsabläufen/Signs for Time: Notation and Transcription of Movements. KODIKAS/KODE 18: 113–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Psycholinguistische Aspekte der Transkription: Zur Notation von Pausen in Gesprächstranskripten. Linguistische Berichte 183: 355–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Datenerhebung und Transkription. In G. Rickheit, T. Herrmann & W. Deutsch (eds.) Psycholinguistik/Psycholinguistics: Ein Internationales Handbuch/An international handbook: 92–106. de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindsay, J. S. & D. C. O’Connell. 1993. Transcribers’ changes. Paper, Eastern Psychological Association, Arlington. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macaulay, R. K. 1991. ‘Coz it izny spelt when they say it’: Displaying dialect in writing. American Speech 66: 280–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maclay, H. & C. E. Osgood. 1959. Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech. Word 15: 169–182. . Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macwhinney, B. 1991. The CHILDES project. Erlbaum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macwhinney, B. & C. Snow. 1985. The child language data exchange system. Journal of Child Language 12: 271–296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. The child language data exchange system. Journal of Child Language 17: 457–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. The wheat and the chaff: Or four confusions regarding CHILDES. Journal of Child Language 19: 459–471. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsuhashi, A. 1987. Revising the plan and altering the text. In Matsuhashi A. (ed.) Writing in real time: 197–223. Ablex. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merriam-Webster’s collegiate dictionary, 11th edition 2003. Merriam-Webster. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, E. 1979. Transcription as theory. In Ochs E. & B. B. Schieffelin (eds.) Developmental pragmatics: 43–72. Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Connell, D. C. 1991. The spoken flies away; the written stays put. Georgetown Journal of Languages &Linguistics 2: 274–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Connell, D. C. & S. Kowal. 1994b. The transcriber as language user. In Bartelt, G. (ed.) The dynamics of language processes: 119–142. Gunter Narr. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Basic principles of transcription. In J. Smith, R. Harre & L. Van Langenhove (eds.) Rethinking psychology, Evolving methods, vol. 2: 93–105. Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Transcription and the issue of standardization. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28: 103–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Are transcripts reproducible? Pragmatics 10: 247–269. . Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oller, D. K. & R. E. Eilers. 1975. Phonetic expectation and transcription validity. Phonetica 31: 288–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pittenger, R. E., C. F. Hockett & J. J. Danehy. 1960. The first five minutes. Paul Martineau. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prillwitz, S., R. Leven & H. Zienert & T. Hanke & J. Henning. 1989. HamNoSys Version 2.0 -Hamburger Notationssystem für Gebärdensprachen. Signum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pye, C., K. A. Wilcox & K. A. Siren. 1988. Refining transcriptions. Journal of Child Language 15: 17–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayner, K. & A. Pollatsek. 1989. The psychology of reading. Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roach, P. 1992. Phonetic transcription. In Bright W. (ed.), vol. 3: 200–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roger, D. & P. Bull. 1988. Conversation. Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero, C., D. C. O’Connell & S. Kowal. 2002. Notation systems for transcription: An empirical investigation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 31: 619–631. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shriberg, L. D., J. Kwiatkowski & K. Hoffmann. 1984. A procedure for phonetic transcription by consensus. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 27: 456–465. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spinos, A.-M. R., D. C. O’Connell & S. Kowal. 2002. An empirical investigation of pause notation. Pragmatics 12: 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svartvik, J. & R. Quirk. 1992. A corpus of English conversation. CWK Gleerup. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, I. 1990. Psycholinguistics. Prentice Hall. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. H. & C. West. 1975. Sex roles interruptions and silences in conversation. In Thorne B. & N. Henley (eds.) Language and sex: 105–129. Newbury House. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue