In:Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 1345–1354
Stylistics
Published online: 3 October 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.sty1
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.sty1
Article outline
- 1.Literary stylistics
- 2.General stylistics
- 3.Conclusion
References
References (105)
Black, E. 1993. Metaphor, simile and cognition in Golding’s ‘The inheritors’. Language and Literature 2: 37–48. MetBib
Brown, R. & A. Gilman. 1989. Politeness theory and Shakespeare’s four major tragedies. Language in Society 18: 159–212.
Carter, R. 1989. Directions in the teaching and study of English stylistics. In M. Short (ed.): 10–21.
Culpeper, J. 2002. Computers, language and characterisation: An Analysis of six characters in Romeo and Juliet. In U. Melander-Marttala, C. Östman & M. Kytö (eds.), Conversation in Life and in Literature: Papers from the ASLA Symposium, Association Suedoise de Linguistique Appliquee(ASLA), 15. Uppsala.
Enkvist, N. E. 1964. On defining style. In N. E. Enkvist, J. Spencer & M. Gregory (eds.) Linguistics and style: 1–56. Oxford University Press.
1999. ‘The rack dislimns’: schema and metaphorical pattern in Anthony and Cleopatra. Poetics Today 20: 443–60.
Geyer-Ryan, H. 1988. Heteroglossia in the poetry of Bertolt Brecht and Tony Harrison. In W. Van Peer (ed.): 193–221.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1971. Linguistic function and literary style: and inquiry into the language of William Golding’s ‘The inheritors’. In S. Chatman (ed.) Literary style: 330–365. Oxford University Press.
Jakobson, R. 1960. Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (ed.) Style in language: 350–377. MIT Press.
Leech, G. N. 1965. ‘This bread I Break’: language and interpretation. Review of English Literature 6: 66–75.
1985. Stylistics. In T. A. Van Dijk (ed.) Discourse and literature: 39–57. Benjamins.
Mahlberg, M. 2007. Great Expectations. In M. Lambrou & P. Stockwell (eds.) Contemporary Stylistics. Routledge.
Mukařovský, J. 1964. Standard language and poetic language. In P. L. Garvin (ed.) A Prague school reader on aesthetics, literary structure and style: 17–30. Georgetown University Press.
O’toole, M. 1988. Henry Reed, and what follows the ‘Naming of parts’. In D. Birch & M. O’toole (eds.): 12–30.
Pilkington, A. 2000. Poetic effects: a relevance theory perspective. Benjamins.
Semino, E. & Culpeper, J. (eds.) 2002. Cognitive stylistics: language and cognition in text analysis. Benjamins.
Semino, E. & Short, M. 2004. Corpus stylistics: speech, writing and thought Presentation in a corpus of English writing. Routledge.
Short, M. H. 1973. Linguistic criticism and Baudelaire’s ‘Les chats’. Journal of Literary Semantics 2: 79–99.
Simpson, P. 1989. Politeness phenomena in Ionesco’s ‘The Lesson’. In R. Carter & P. Simpson (eds.): 171–193.
2009. Narrative progression in the short story: a corpus stylistic approach. John Benjamins.
Traugott, E. C. & M. L. Pratt. 1980. Linguistics for students of literature. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Wilson, A. & G. N. Leech. 1993. Automatic content analysis and the stylistic analysis of prose literature. Revue Informatique et Statistique dans les Sciences Humaines 29: 219–234.
Zwaan, R. A. 1993. Aspects of literary comprehension. Benjamins.
Related articles: Communicative style, Discourse analysis, Emphasis, Figures of speech, Literary pragmatics, Vilém Mathesius, Rhetoric, Text linguistics.
