In:Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 1181–1197
Semantics vs. pragmatics
Published online: 3 October 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.sem2
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.sem2
Article outline
- 1.Fregean beginnings
- 2.From then until now
- 3.Current manoeuvres: (Neo-(Post-))Gricean pragmatics
- 3.1Relevance Theory
- 3.2The Least Effort Hypothesis
- 3.3The Q-, I- and M-Principles Hypothesis
- 3.4Pragmatic intrusion
- 4.Current manoeuvres: (Neo-(Post-))Kaplanean semantics
- 5.Postscript: The logical basis of the semantics-pragmatics interface
- 6.Conclusion
Notes References
References (78)
Allwood, J. 1981. On the distinctions between semantics and pragmatics. In W. Klein & W.L Evelt (eds.) Crossing the Boundaries in Linguistics: 177–189. Reidel Publishing Company.
Attardo, S. 1997. Competition and cooperation: Beyond Gricean pragmatics. Pragmatics & Cognition 5: 21–50.
1997. Pragmatics, semantic underdetermination and the referential/attributive distinction. Mind 106: 375–409.
Carston, R. 1988. Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics. In R. Kempson (ed.): 155–181.
Clyne, M. 1994. Inter-cultural Communication at Work: Cultural Values in Discourse. Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, J. L. 1971. Some remarks on Grice’s views about the logical particles of natural language. In Y. Bar-Hillel (ed.) Pragmatics of Natural Languages: 50–68. Reidel Publishing Company.
Dascal, M. 1981. Contextualism. In H. Parret, M. Sbisà & J. Verschueren (eds.)Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics: 153–177. John Benjamins. .
Davis, S. 1987. The distinction between pragmatics and semantics. In J. Verschueren & M. Bertuccelli-Papi (eds.): 685–693. John Benjamins.
Dummett, M. 1975. Can analytical philosophy be systematic, and ought it to be?[Republished in his 1978. Truth and Other Enigmas. London]
Fant, L. 1990. On the relevance of the semantics/pragmatics distinction. In L. Lundquist & L. Schack Rasmussen (eds.) Pragmatics and its Manifestations in Language: 16–40. Handelshøjskolens Forlag.
Frege, G. 1897. Logic. In H. Hermes et al. (eds.)(1979) Gottlob Frege: Posthumous Writings: 126–151. Blackwell.
Grice, P. 1968. Utterer’s meaning, sentence meaning, and word meaning. Foundations of Language 4: 225–42.
1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts:41–58. Academic Press.
Grimberg, M. L. 1996. Pragmatically determined aspects of what is said: A reply to Bezuidenhout. Mind and Language 11: 415–426.
Hintikka, K. & I. Halonen. 1995. Semantics and pragmatics for why-questions. Journal of Philosophy 92: 636–657.
Horn, L. R. 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (ed.) Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications: 11–42. Georgetown University Press.
1988. Pragmatic theory. In F. J. Newmeyer (ed.) Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey:113–145. Cambridge University Press.
Kamp, H. 1979. Semantics versus pragmatics. In F. Guenthner & S. J. Schmidt (eds.) Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages:255–287. Reidel Publishing Company.
1989a. Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In J. Almog, J. Perry & H. K. Wettstein (eds.) Themes from Kaplan: 481–563. Oxford University Press.
1989b. Afterthoughts. In J. Almog, J. Perry & H. K. Wettstein, (eds.) Themes from Kaplan: 565–614. Oxford University Press.
Kempson, R. M. (ed.) 1988. Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality. Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C. 1987a. Minimization and conversational inference. In J. Verschueren & M. Bertuccelli-Papi (eds.): 61–129.
1987b. Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics 23: 379–434.
1995. Three levels of meaning. In F. R. Palmer (ed.) Grammar and Meaning: 90–115. Cambridge University Press.
Lumsden, D. 1996. How well does direct reference semantics fit with pragmatics? Philosophical Papers 25: 139–148.
Lyons, J. 1987. Semantics. In J. Lyons et al. (eds.) New Horizons in Linguistics 2:152–178. Penguin.
Nicolle, S. & B. Clark. 1999. Experimental pragmatics and what is said: A response to Gibbs and Moise. Cognition 66: 337–354.
Posner, R. 1980. Semantics and pragmatics of sentence connectives in natural language. In J. R. Searle, F. Kiefer & M. Bierwisch (eds.) Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics: 169–203. Reidel.
1994. Contextualism and anti-contextualism in the philosophy of language. In S. Tsohatzidis (ed.): 156–166.
Richard, M. 1990. Propositional Attitudes: An Essay on Thoughts and How We Ascribe Them. Cambridge University Press.
Roberts, L. D. 1991. Relevance as an explanation of communication. Linguistics and Philosophy: 453–472.
Sarangi, S. K. & S. Slembrouck. 1992. Non-cooperation in communication: A reassessment of Gricean pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 17: 117–154.
Segerdahl, P. 1996. Language Use: A Philosophical Investigation into the Basic Notions of Pragmatics. Macmillan Press Ltd.
. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell. MetBib
Tsohatzidis, S. L. (ed.) 1994. Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives. Routledge.
Turner, K. (ed.) 1999. The Semantics-Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View. Elsevier Science.
Verschueren, J. & M. Bertuccelli-Papi (eds.) The Pragmatic Perspective. John Benjamins.
