Cover not available

In:Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 572–586

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Forensic linguistics

Published online: 3 October 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.for2
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Language in legal settings
  • 3.Scientific study of language for legal or investigative purposes
  • 4.The forensic linguist as expert witness
  • 5.Forensic Linguists in academia and practitioner disciplines
  • 6.Future developments
  • References
References (59)
References
Benneworth, K. M. 2010. “Negotiating paedophilia: How sexual offences are constructed in the investigative interview.” In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, ed. by M. Coulthard and A. Johnson, 139–154. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blackwell, S. 2012. “History of forensic linguistics.” In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. by C. A. Chapelle. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butters, R. 2010. “Trademark Linguistics – Trademarks: Language that one owns.” In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, ed. by M. Coulthard and A. Johnson, 351–364. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, E. 2008. Policing Talk: An Investigation into the Interaction of the Officer and the Suspect in the Police Interview. University of Essex PhD dissertation.
2011. Analysing Police Interviews: Laughter, Confessions and the Tape. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. “When is a lie not a lie? When it’s divergent: Examining lies and deceptive responses in a police interview.” Language and Law (Linguagem e Direto) 1(1).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conley, J. M. and W. M. O’Barr. 2005. Just Words: Law, Language, and Power (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulthard, M. 2000. “Whose text is it? On the linguistic investigation of authorship.” In Discourse and Social Life, ed. by S. Sarangi and M. Coulthard, 270–287. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. “Author identification, idiolect and linguistic uniqueness.” Applied Linguistics 25 (4): 431–447. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulthard, M. and A. Johnson. 2007. An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(eds). 2010. The Handbook of Forensic Linguistics. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulthard, M., T. Grant and K. Kredens. 2011. “Forensic Linguistics.” In The SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistics, ed. by R. Wodak, B. Johnstone, and P. L. Kerswill. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Department of Justice. 2014. U. S. Departments of Justice and Commerce Name Experts to First-ever National Commission on Forensic Science. Washington: Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs. [URL]. Last accessed 27/01/14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’hondt, S. 2010. “The cultural defense as courtroom drama: The enactment of identity, sameness and difference in criminal trial discourse.” Law and social enquiry 35 (1): 67–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drew, P. 1992. “Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by P. Drew and J. Heritage, 470–520. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dumas, B. K. 2000. “US Pattern Jury Instructions: Problems and proposals.” The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 7 (1): 49–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eades, D. 2000. “I don’t think it’s an answer to the question: Silencing Aboriginal witnesses in court.” Language in Society 29: 161–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grant, T. 2010. “Txt 4n6: Idiolect free authorship analysis.” In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, ed. by M. Coulthard and A. Johnson, 508–522. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbons, J. 2003. Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbons, J. and M. Teresa Turell (eds). 2008. Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haworth, K. 2010. “Police interviews in the judicial process: Police interviews as evidence.” In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, ed. by M. Coulthard, and A. Johnson, 169–181. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heffer, C. 2008. “The language and communication of jury instruction.” In Dimensions of Forensic Linguistics, ed. by J. Gibbons and M. Teresa Turell. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heffer, C., F. Rock and J. Conley. 2013. Legal-Lay Communication: Textual Travels in the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heydon, G. 2005. The Language of Police Interviewing: A Critical Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofstra University 2014 Programme: Linguistics: Forensic Linguistics . [URL]. [Accessed 30/01/14.]
Holt, E. and A. Johnson. 2010. “Socio-pragmatics of police interviews and trial discourse.” In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, ed. by M. Coulthard and A. Johnson. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
IAFL. 2013. Forensic Linguistics. [URL] [Accessed 30/01/14.]
Kebbell, M. R. and D. C. Giles. 2000. “Some experimental influences of lawyers’ complicated questions on eye-witness confidence and accuracy.” Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied 134: 129–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kramer, G. and D. Koenig. 1990. “Do jurors understand criminal jury instructions?” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 23 (3): 401–438.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kredens, K. 2006. “On the status of linguistic evidence in litigation.” In Language, Communication, Information 1(1), ed. by P. Nowak and P. Nowakowski. Sorus Publishers: Poznan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kredens, K. and M. Coulthard. 2012. “Corpus linguistics in authorship identification.” In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, ed. by P. Tiersma and L. Solan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kredens, K. and R. Morris. 2010. “‘A Shattered Mirror?’ Interpreting in legal contexts outside the courtroom.” In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, ed. by M. Coulthard and A. Johnson. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levi, J. N. 1993. “Evaluating jury comprehension of Illinois capital-sentencing instructions.” American Speech 68 (1): 20–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacLeod, N. 2013. “Forensic linguistics: Overview.” In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. by C. A. Chapelle. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matoesian, G. 2001. Law and the Language of Identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith Rape Trial. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1993. Reproducing Rape Domination through Talk in the Courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McMenamin, G. R. 2002. Forensic Linguistics: Advances in Forensic Stylistics. Florida: CRC Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, E. 2008. The case for forensic linguistics. BBC News. [URL] [Accessed 05/02/14.]
Olsson, J. 2004. Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language, Crime, and the Law. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Forensic Linguistics (2nd edn). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) 1984. Codes of Practice. Order 1988. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rock, F. 2010. “Witnesses and suspects in interviews.” In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, ed. by M. Coulthard and A. Johnson, 138–152. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shuy, R. W. 1999. The Language of Confession, Interrogation and Deception. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. Linguistic Battles in Trademark Disputes. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. “Breaking into language and law: The trials of the insider-linguist.” In Round Table on Language and Linguistics: Linguistics, Language and the Professions, ed. by J. E. Alatis, H. E. Hamilton and A. Tan. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Solan, L. M. 1993. The Language of Judges. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Solan, L. M. and P. M. Tiersma. 2005. Speaking of Crime: The Language of Criminal Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sousa Silva, R., T. Grant and B. Maia. 2010. “‘I didn’t mean to steal someone else’s words!’: A forensic linguistic approach to detecting intentional plagiarism.” 4th International Plagiarism Conference. Newcastle-upon-Tyne. [URL] [Accessed 10/02/14.]
Sousa Silva, R., G. Laboreiro, T. Grant, E. Oliveira and B. Maia. 2011. “‘Twazn me!!! ;(’ Automatic authorship analysis of micro-blogging messages.” Natural Language Processing and Information Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6716: 161–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Storey-Whyte, K. 1997. “KISSing the Jury – the advantages and limitations of the ‘keep it simple’ principle in the presentation of expert evidence to courts and juries.” International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 4: 280–286.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stygall, G. 2010. “Complex documents/average and not-so-average readers.” In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, ed. by M. Coulthard and A. Johnson, 333–347. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The Law Commission 2011. “Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings in England and Wales.” Law Com No. 325. London: The Stationery Office. [URL]. [Accessed 10/02/14.]
Tiersma, P. 1999. Legal Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. “The creation, structure and interpretation of legal text.” Language and the Law.org. [URL] [Accessed 11/02/14.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tiersma, P. M. and L. M. Solan. 2002. “The linguist on the witness stand: Forensic linguistics in American courts.” Language 78: 221–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tkačuková, T. 2010a. “Lay people as cross-examiners: A linguistic analysis of the libel case McDonald’s Corporation v. Helen Steel and David Morris.” PhD Abstract. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law X: 307–310.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010b. “Representing oneself. Cross-examination questioning: Lay people as cross-examiners.” In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, ed. by M. Coulthard and A. Johnson, 333–347. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wheatcroft, J. M., G. F. Wagstaff and M. R. Kebbell. 2004. “The influence of courtroom questioning style on actual and perceived eyewitness confidence and accuracy.” Legal and Criminal Psychology 9: 83–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue