In:Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 1578–1617
Experimentation
Published online: 3 October 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.exp1
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.exp1
Article outline
- 1.Theoretical approaches to science
- 2.Empirical approaches to science
- 3.Experimentation
- 3.1Issues in experimental design
- 3.1.1Operationalization of the experimental hypothesis
- 3.1.2Independent and dependent variables
- 3.1.3Choosing the dependent variable: how to best tap into the targeted process
- 3.1.4The orthogonal experimental design
- 3.1.5The concept of matching and the necessity of a control condition
- 3.1.6Manipulations within or between participants (or items)
- 3.1.7The counterbalancing technique
- 3.2The rationale behind statistical significance testing
- 3.2.1Basic assumption: the observed difference is due to chance
- 3.2.2Calling a result statistically significant is taking a calculated risk
- 3.2.3Main effects and interaction effects
- 3.3Statistical tests
- 3.3.1Types of measurement scales
- 3.3.2Non-parametric statistics
- 3.3.2.1The chi-square test
- 3.3.2.2The Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney test
- 3.3.3Parametric statistics
- 3.3.3.1Some general remarks
- 3.3.3.2The student’s t-test
- General aspects
- Paired versus independent observations
- One-tailed versus two-tailed t-tests
- 3.3.3.3Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
- 3.3.3.4Measuring the associative strength between variables
- Correlation analysis
- Regression analysis
- 3.1Issues in experimental design
- 4.Conclusion
References
References (32)
Baayen, R. H. (in press) Analyzing Linguistic Data. A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge University Press.
Baayen, R. H., L. H. Wurm & J. Aycock. 2007. Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: A regression study across tasks and modalities. The Mental Lexicon 2: 419–463.
Berkum, J. J. A. Van, D. Van Den Brink, C. M. J.Y Tesink, M. Kos & P. Hagoort. 2008. The neural integration of speaker and message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20: 580–591.
Clifton Jr., C. & A. Staub. 2008. Parallelism and competition in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 234–250.
Diependaele, K., D. Sandra & J. Grainger. 2005. Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes 20: 75–114.
Ferreira, F. & J. M. Henderson. 1990. Use of Verb Information in Syntactic Parsing: Evidence From Eye Movements and Word-by-Word Self-Paced Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16: 555–568.
Fischer, M. H., W. S. Murray & R. L. Hill (eds) 2007. Eye movements: A window on mind and brain. Elsevier.
Forster, K. I. & C. Davis. 1984. Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 10: 680–698.
Forbach, G. B., R. F. Stanners & L. Hochaus. 1974. Repetition and practice effects in a lexical decision task. Memory and Cognition 2: 337–339.
Garrett, M. F. 1975. The analysis of sentence production. In G. H. Bower (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Volume 9). New York: Academic Press.
Grainger, J. & P. J. Holcomb. 2009. An ERP investigation of orthographic priming with relative-position and absolute-position primes. Brain Research 1270: 45–53.
Hagoort, P. 2008. The fractionation of spoken language understanding by measuring electrical and magnetic brain signals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 363: 1055–1070.
Holcomb, P. J. & J. Grainger. 2009. ERP effects of short interval masked associative and repetition priming. Journal of Neurolinguistics 22: 301–312.
Kirk, R. E. 1982. Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Brooks/Cole.
Koornneef, A. W. & J. J. A. Van Berkum. 2006. On the use of verb-based implicit causality in sentence comprehension: Evidence from self-paced reading and eye tracking. Journal of Memory and Language 54: 445–465.
Longtin, C. M., J. Segui & P. A. Hallé. 2003. Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes 18: 313–334.
Mccall, R. B. 1970. Fundamental Statistics for Behavioral Sciences. (5th ed.) Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Midgley, K. J., P. J. Holcomb & J. Grainger. 2009. Masked repetition and translation priming in second language learners: A window on the time-course of form and meaning activation using ERPs. Psychophysiology 46: 551–565.
Pollatsek, A., B. J. Juhasz, E. D. Reichle, D. Machacek & K. Rayner. 2008. Immediate and delayed effects of word frequency and word length on eye movements during reading: A reversed delayed effect of word length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Peformance 34: 726–750.
Pollatsek, A., K. Rayner & E. Reichle (in press). The E-Z Reader model of silent reading. In K. Rayner, D. Shen, X. Bai & G. Yan (eds.), Cognitive and Cultural Influences on Eye Movements. Psychology Press.
Rayner, K., K. Chace, T. Slattery & J. Ashby. 2006. Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading 10: 241–255.
Rayner, K. & A. Pollatsek (in press). Eye movements during reading. In B. Goldstein (Ed.), Sage Encyclopedia of Perception. Sage Press.
Rayner, K., A. Pollatsek, D. Drieghe, T. J. Slattery & E. D. Reichle. 2007. Tracking the mind during reading via eye movements: Comments on Kliegl, Nuthmann, and Engbert (2006). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136: 520–529.
Scarborough, D. L., C. Cortese & H. S. Scarborough. 1977. Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3: 1–17.
Schreuder R. & R. H. Baayen. 1997. How Complex Simplex Words Can Be. Journal of Memory and Language 37: 118–139.
Staub, A. & K. Rayner. 2007. Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes. In G. Gaskell (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics: 327–342. Oxford University Press.
Trueswell, J. C. 1996. The Role of Lexical Frequency in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 35: 566–585.
