Cover not available

In:Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 1516–1527

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Corpus pragmatics

Published online: 3 October 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.cor3
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Corpus compilation and annotation
  • 3.Form-to-function mapping
  • 4.Function-to-form mapping
    • 4.1Search for IFIDs
    • 4.2Typical pattern search
    • 4.3Communicative expression analysis
  • 5.Conclusion
  • References
References (33)
References
Aarts, J. 2011. “Corpus analysis.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by J.-O. Östman and J. Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijmer, K. 1996. Conversational Routines in English. Convention and Creativity. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. “At the interface between grammar and discourse: A corpus-based study of some pragmatic markers.” In Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics. A Mutualistic Entente, ed. by J. Romero-Trillo, 11–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. “Interjections in the COLT Corpus.” In Studies in Linguistics offered to Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, ed. by S. Slembrouck, M. Taverniers and M. Herreweghe, 11–19. Gent: Academia Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Archer, D. and J. Culpeper. 2003. “Sociopragmatic annotation: New directions and possibilities in historical corpus linguistics.” In Corpus Linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, ed. by A. Wilson, P. Rayson and T. Mcenery, 37–58. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Archer, D., J. Culpeper and M. Davies. 2008. “Pragmatic annotation.” In Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook. Volume 1 (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 29/1), ed. by A. Lüdeling and M. Kytö, 613–642. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. 2009. Oxford English Corpus” In Contemporary Corpus Linguistics, ed. by Paul Baker, 64–86. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Impoliteness. Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. and M. Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues. Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deutschmann, M. 2003. Apologising in British English. (Skrifter från moderna språk 10). Umeå: Institutionen för moderna språk, Umeå University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaworski, A., N. Coupland and D. Galasiński. 2004. “Metalanguage: Why now?” In Metalanguage. Social and Ideological Perspectives, ed. by A. Jaworski, N. Coupland and D. Galasiński, 3–10. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, A. H. 2009. “Speech act research between armchair, field and laboratory: The case of compliments.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (8): 1611–1635. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, A.H., G. Schneider, I. Taavitsainen and B. Breustedt. 2008. “Fishing for compliments: Precision and recall in corpus-linguistic compliment research.” In Speech Acts in the History of English, ed. by A. H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen, 273–294. Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, A. H. and I. Taavitsainen. 2008. “Apologies in the history of English: Routinized and lexicalized expressions of responsibility and regret.” In Speech Acts in the History of English, ed. by A. H. Jucker and I. Taavitsainen, 229–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (forthc.) “Complimenting in the history of American English: A metacommunicative expression analysis.” In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics, ed. by I. Taavitsainen and A. H. Jucker. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jucker, A. H., I. Taavitsainen and G. Schneider. 2012. “Semantic corpus trawling: Expressions of ‘courtesy’ and ‘politeness’ in the Helsinki Corpus.” In Developing Corpus Methodology for Historical Pragmatics (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 11), ed. by Carla Suhr and Irma Taavitsainen. Helsinki: Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English. Available online at 〈 [URL]〉. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kohnen, T. 2008. “Tracing directives through text and time: Towards a methodology of a corpus-based diachronic speech-act analysis.” In Speech Acts in the History of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176), ed. by A. H. Jucker and I. Taavitsainen, 295–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manes, J. and N. Wolfson. 1981. “The compliment formula.” In Conversational Routine. Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 115–132. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mcenery, T. and A. Hardie. 2012. Corpus Linguistics. Method, Theory and Practice. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mcenery, T., R. Xiao and Y. Tono. 2006. Corpus-Based Language Studies. An Advanced Resource Book. (Routledge Applied Linguistics). London: Francis and Taylor.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, T. and H. Tissari. 2010. “Contextualising eighteenth-century politeness: Social distinction and metaphorical levelling.” In Eighteenth-Century English: Ideology and Change (Studies in English Language), ed. by R. Hickey, 133–158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, A. 2004. “ Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast.” In Corpora and Discourse. (Studies in Language and Communication 9). ed. by A. Partington, J. Morley and L. Haarman, 11–20. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, J. 2008. “Introduction: Pragmatics and corpus linguistics – a mutualistic entente.” In Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics. A Mutualistic Entente, ed. by J. Romero-Trillo, 1–10. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, D. 1987. Discourse Markers. (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, 5). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, E. 2001. Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tottie, G. 2011. Uh and Um as sociolinguistic markers in British English.” The International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16: 173–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valkonen, P. 2008. “Showing a little promise: Identifying and retrieving explicit illocutionary acts from a corpus of written prose.” In Speech Acts in the History of English (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176), ed. by A. H. Jucker and I. Taavitsainen, 247–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weisser, M. 2003. “SPAACy: A semi-automated tool for annotating dialogue acts.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8 (1): 63–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. 1987. English Speech Act Verbs: A Semantic Dictionary. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue