In:Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual
Edited by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman
[Handbook of Pragmatics M2] 2022
► pp. 279–294
Conceptual semantics
Published online: 3 October 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.con12
https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.m2.con12
Article outline
- 1.Historical background: conceptual semantics as a generative theory
- 2.Goals of the research
- 3.Background assumptions
- 3.1The system nature of mind and language
- 3.2Modularity of mind: representational modularity
- 3.3Cognitive constraint
- 4.Methodological guidelines for conceptual semantics
- 5.Formalism and technical solutions
- 5.1Some key terms of representational modularity
- 5.2Conceptual structure
- 5.2.1Thematic tier
- 5.2.2Action tier
- 5.2.3Temporal tier
- 5.2.4Semantic field tier
- 5.2.5Modal tier
- 5.3Inference rules
- 5.4Linking
- 6.Conclusion
References
References (38)
Carlson, L. A. & Van Der Zee, E. (eds.) 2005. Functional features in language and space: Insights from perception, categorization and development. Oxford University Press.
. 1970. Remarks on nominalizations. In R. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar: 184–221. Blaisdell.
Croft, W. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press.
Fillmore, C.J. 1968. The case for case. In E. Bach & R. Harms (eds), Universals in Linguistic Theory: 1–88. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Fillmore, C. J. & P. Kay. 1996. Construction grammar. CSLI Lecture Notes 5, Linguistics X 20. University of California at Berkeley.
Fried, M. & J.-O. Östman. 2004. Construction grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In M. Fried & J.-O. Östman (eds.), Construction Grammar in a Cross-Language Perspective: 11–86. John Benjamins.
1978. Grammar as evidence for conceptual structure. In M. Halle J. Bresnan & G. Miller (eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality: 201–228. MIT Press.
1991. Cognition 41: 9-45. Reprinted in B. Levin & S. Pinker (eds.) 1992. Lexical and conceptual semantics: 9–45.. Blackwell.
. 1996. The architecture of the linguistic-spatial interface. In P. Bloom M. Peterson, L. Nadel & M. Garrett (eds.), Language and Space: 1–30. MIT Press.
Jackendoff, R. & B. Landau. 1991. Spatial language and spatial cognition. In D. J. Napoli & J. Kegl (eds.) Bridges Between Psychology and Language: A Swarthmore Festschrift for Lila Gleitman: 144–169Erlbaum. (Revised version in Jackendoff ,Languages of the Mind.)
Kay, P. 1995. Construction grammar. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman & J. Blommaert (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual. John Benjamins.
Nikanne, U. 1990. Zones and tiers: A study of thematic structure. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
Studia Fennica Linguistica 35
.
. 1995b. Interpretive semantics. In J. Verscheuren, J.-O. Östman & J. Blommaert (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics: Manual: 338–343. John Benjamins.
. 1997a. Lexical conceptual structure and syntactic arguments.
SKY 1997
. 81–118.
. 1997c. Locative case adjuncts in Finnish: Notes on syntactico-semantic interface. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 20: 155–178.
. 2002.Kerrokset ja kytkennät [‘Tiers and links’]: [URL] (Downloaded: 4 May 2008.)
. 2005. Constructions in conceptual semantics. In J.-O. Östman & M. Fried (eds.): 191–242.
Östman J.-O. & M. Fried (eds.) 2005. Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. John Benjamins.
